Health Status and Its Socio-economic Covariates of the Older Population in Poland - the Nationwide PolSenior2 Survey.
PolSenior2
1 other identifier
observational
6,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The PolSenior2 survey is aimed to characterise health status of old and very-old adults in Poland.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2018
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 15, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 19, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2020
CompletedJuly 19, 2019
July 1, 2019
2 years
July 15, 2019
July 17, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Functional status as assessed by Vulnerable Elders Survey-13
The Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (VES-13) is a simple function-based tool for screening community-dwelling populations to identify older persons at risk for health deterioration. The VES-13 considers age, self-related health, limitation in physical function, and functional disabilities. The total possible score ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating increased disability.
baseline
Functional status as assessed by Instrumental Activity of Daily Living
This will be assessed using the Instrumental Activity of Daily Living (IADL-Lawton) instrument. IADL evaluates independent living skills. Each activity has specific level of participation that can be selected. Scores range from 0 (low function, dependent) to 8 points (high function, independent).
baseline
Functional status as assessed by Activity of Daily Living Index
This will be assessed using the Activity of Daily Living (ADL-Katz Index) instrument. ADL evaluates functional status as a measurement of the patient's ability to perform activities of daily living. Each activity is rated as being completed independently or not. Scores range is 0-6 points, higher score is better.
baseline
Mood deterioration incidence
The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) is a 15-item self-report assessment designed specifically to identify symptoms of depression in the elderly. Participants are asked to respond by answering yes or no in reference to how they felt over the past 2 weeks. The score 5 and more suggests the suspicion of depression, higher scores indicate more severe depressive syndrome. The final diagnosis of depression needs clinical assessment.
baseline
Cognitive functions as assessed by the Mini Mental State Examination
The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) investigates specific cognitive functions. Scale range: 0-30. The score 23 and below indicates significant deterioration of cognitive functions and dementia. Score between 24-27 indicates mild cognitive impairment. Normal score ranges between 28-30.
baseline
Cognitive functions as assessed by Clock Drawing Test
The Clock Drawing Test is a test used for the assessment of cognitive impairment based on sketches of a clock completed by a patient. The assessment is based on identifying abnormalities in the drawings, which may include poor number positioning, omission of numbers, incorrect sequencing, missing clock hands and the presence of irrelevant writing. According to Sunderland the score is: 0-10. Higher score indicates normal cognitive functions.
baseline
Comorbidities incidence
the prevalence of comorbidities
baseline
Nutritional status assessed by the Mini Nutritional Assessment questionnaire (MNA)
The MNA is a validated nutrition screening and assessment tool that can identify geriatric patients age 65 and above who are malnourished or at risk of malnutrition. The Screening score(max. 14 points) is 12-14 points indicates "Normal nutritional status", 8-11 points indicates "At risk of malnutrition", 0-7 points indicates "Malnourished". For the full assessment there are proposed scores: 24 pts and more "Normal nutritional status"; 23,5-17 "At risk of malnutrition"; below 17 - malnourished"
baseline
Sarkopenia incidence
The prevalence of sarcopenia will be assessed by analysis of grip strength (use of dynamometer).
baseline
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Number of drugs taken
baseline
Medical care availability
five years back from baseline
Quality of life as assessed by the World Health Organization Quality of Life Age (WHOQOL-AGE)
baseline
Quality and patterns of sleep assessmed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
baseline
Alcohol abuse assessment
baseline
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (7)
60 - 65 years
Subjects were selected using a three stage stratified and proportional random sampling in seven equally size (n=850) age groups: 60-65, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, 80-84, 85-89, 90+ years.
65 - 69 years
Subjects were selected using a three stage stratified and proportional random sampling in seven equally size (n=850) age groups: 60-65, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, 80-84, 85-89, 90+ years.
70 - 74 years
Subjects were selected using a three stage stratified and proportional random sampling in seven equally size (n=850) age groups: 60-65, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, 80-84, 85-89, 90+ years.
75 - 79 years
Subjects were selected using a three stage stratified and proportional random sampling in seven equally size (n=850) age groups: 60-65, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, 80-84, 85-89, 90+ years.
80 - 84 years
Subjects were selected using a three stage stratified and proportional random sampling in seven equally size (n=850) age groups: 60-65, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, 80-84, 85-89, 90+ years.
85 - 89 years
Subjects were selected using a three stage stratified and proportional random sampling in seven equally size (n=850) age groups: 60-65, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, 80-84, 85-89, 90+ years.
≥90 years
Subjects were selected using a three stage stratified and proportional random sampling in seven equally size (n=850) age groups: 60-65, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, 80-84, 85-89, 90+ years.
Interventions
The study protocol consists of questionnaires (medical, socio-economic, dietary), comprehensive geriatric assessment, physical examination, anthropometric and blood pressure measurements and laboratory tests.
Eligibility Criteria
The research population is assumed to include 6000 individuals in seven equivalent age cohorts (60-64 years, 65-69 years, 70-74 years, 75-79 years, 80-84 years, 85-89 years, 90+ years old) with equal representation of males and females in each of them. Research participants were randomly recruited in a stratified, proportional draw. The pattern for respondent selection was designed to obtain a population representative for Polish old citizens.
You may qualify if:
- over 60 years of age,
- randomly selected from database of all Polish citizens,
- consent to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- under 60 years of age,
- no consent to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, Polandcollaborator
- Medical University of Gdansklead
- Medical University of Silesiacollaborator
- Jagiellonian Universitycollaborator
- International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Warsawcollaborator
- SGH Warsaw School of Economicscollaborator
- Medical University of Lodzcollaborator
- National Institute of Public Health-National Institute of Hygienecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Medical University of Gdańsk
Gdansk, Poland
Biospecimen
36 ml of whole blood and 20 ml of urine samples
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tomasz R. Zdrojewski, MD, Prof
Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D., Ph.D., Assoc. Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 15, 2019
First Posted
July 19, 2019
Study Start
January 1, 2018
Primary Completion
December 31, 2019
Study Completion
December 31, 2020
Last Updated
July 19, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07