Validating Reward-related Biomarkers (RTOC)
RTOC
1 other identifier
observational
160
4 countries
4
Brief Summary
Deficits or abnormalities in reward processing are present in a number of psychiatric disorders. The overarching objective of the study is to conduct initial validation work towards optimising three experimental tasks - which have previously been shown to be sensitive to reward processing deficits - for future use in clinical trials. This initial validation work has the primary objective to uncover group differences in task outcome measures between healthy control participants, participants with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and participants with schizophrenia (SZ) using statistical analyses. This may provide some indications for the use of these tasks as clinically-relevant biomarkers. Primary aims include: (i) comparing the investigator's endpoint means and distributions to those in previously published data; (ii) replication of previously-reported differences between MDD/SZ vs. healthy control participants, and, (iii) exploring the relationship between task endpoints and subjective participant- and clinician-rated report of reward-related constructs (e.g. anhedonia, negative symptoms).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Sep 2019
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 16, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 18, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 16, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2021
CompletedJuly 26, 2022
July 1, 2022
1.4 years
July 16, 2019
July 25, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Grip effort outcome
Percentage of hard task choices at different reward levels
Day 1
Doors task outcome
"Feedback negativity", an event-related potential (ERP) at approximately 300ms after feedback presentation indicating a favourable versus unfavourable outcome in paradigms in which the participant loses or wins money.
Day 1
RL/WM task outcome
Accuracy as function of set size (difficulty)
Day 1
Study Arms (3)
HV
Humans aged 20-55 without a diagnosis of a psychiatric and neurological disorder.
SZ
Humans aged 20-55 with a primary Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition (DSM-5) diagnosis of Schizophrenia.
MDD
Humans aged 20-55 with a primary Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition (DSM-5) diagnosis of MDD.
Interventions
* Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS; Snaith et al. 1995) * Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS; 16 items) * Behavioral avoidance/inhibition Scales (BIS/BAS)
* Grip Strength Effort Task (Reddy et al. 2015; in combination with EEG) * Doors (Gambling) task (Foti and Hajcak 2009; in combination with EEG) * Reinforcement Learning/Working Memory task (Collins et al. 2017; no EEG)
* Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS: Kay et al. 1987) * Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS; Kirkpatrick et al. 2011)
Eligibility Criteria
A sample of 37 completed individuals with MDD, 37 completed individuals with SZ, and a maximum of 80 healthy volunteers (without a neurological or psychiatric disorder) who will not differ on age or gender.
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Maastricht Universitylead
- P1vital Products LTD.collaborator
- Biotrialcollaborator
- University Hospital Frankfurt, Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapycollaborator
- The Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Addictions (INAD), Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelonacollaborator
- Aristotle University Of Thessalonikicollaborator
- Maastricht University, School for Mental Health and Neurosciencecollaborator
Study Sites (4)
University Hospital Frankfurt, Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherap
Frankfurt, Germany
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine, Department of Clinical Pharmacology
Thessaloniki, Greece
Maastricht University
Maastricht, Netherlands
Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Addictions (INAD), Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona
Barcelona, Spain
Related Publications (4)
Foti D, Hajcak G. Depression and reduced sensitivity to non-rewards versus rewards: Evidence from event-related potentials. Biol Psychol. 2009 Apr;81(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.12.004. Epub 2008 Dec 31.
PMID: 19162124BACKGROUNDCollins AGE, Albrecht MA, Waltz JA, Gold JM, Frank MJ. Interactions Among Working Memory, Reinforcement Learning, and Effort in Value-Based Choice: A New Paradigm and Selective Deficits in Schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Sep 15;82(6):431-439. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.05.017. Epub 2017 May 31.
PMID: 28651789BACKGROUNDReddy LF, Horan WP, Barch DM, Buchanan RW, Dunayevich E, Gold JM, Lyons N, Marder SR, Treadway MT, Wynn JK, Young JW, Green MF. Effort-Based Decision-Making Paradigms for Clinical Trials in Schizophrenia: Part 1-Psychometric Characteristics of 5 Paradigms. Schizophr Bull. 2015 Sep;41(5):1045-54. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv089. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
PMID: 26142081RESULTBilderbeck AC, Raslescu A, Hernaus D, Hayen A, Umbricht D, Pemberton D, Tiller J, Sogaard B, Sambeth A, van Amelsvoort T, Reif A, Papazisis G, Perez V, Elices M, Maurice D, Bertaina-Anglade V, Dawson GR, Pollentier S. Optimizing Behavioral Paradigms to Facilitate Development of New Treatments for Anhedonia and Reward Processing Deficits in Schizophrenia and Major Depressive Disorder: Study Protocol. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 5;11:536112. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.536112. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 33250788DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Dennis Hernaus, PhD
Maastricht University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 16, 2019
First Posted
July 18, 2019
Study Start
September 16, 2019
Primary Completion
February 1, 2021
Study Completion
February 1, 2021
Last Updated
July 26, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
The RTOC clinical study has received funding from Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, H. Lundbeck, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Blackthorn Therapeutics, and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. All individual data will be made available to these parties.