Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Average and High Risk Population
1 other identifier
interventional
537
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The existing evidence from epidemiological studies and randomized controlled trials has consistently assures the cost effectiveness and the influential role of screening in reducing incidence rates and deaths caused by Colorectal Cancer (CRC). Population based organized screening programmes, which should be considered an obligation that is not to be postponed, require valuable information that can be reliably extrapolated from well-designed pilot study conducted prior to programme implementation. The main objectives of the current pilot CRC screening project, named after "Al-Kindy College of Medicine", was to evaluate and explore the specific aspects of the intended population-based organized CRC screening programme, including: barriers affecting adherence to the programme, performance indicators of the proposed screening programme, the target population in which CRC screening is a legitimate healthcare priority, quality assurance of screening tests and colonoscopy services, and to propose an algorithm that will provide a clinically and logistically acceptable positivity rate.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for early_phase_1
Started Apr 2015
Typical duration for early_phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 12, 2019
CompletedSeptember 4, 2019
July 1, 2019
2.2 years
July 1, 2019
September 2, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
prevalence of causes accounting for population disagreement to participate in screening. programme.
Eligible screenees who do not have the willingness to participate were asked to identify their disagreement cause(s) from the list included in the invitation letter and reported as: 1. I don't have the will or time to be enrolled. 2. My residence is far off the program center. 3. I am afraid the program will unveil the presence of the disease. 4. I cannot accept and tolerate the tests included in the program. 5. I am not fully persuaded about the program achievability. 6. Infeasibility of freely provided medical services.
Documented on one occasion, during invitation interview as an act on disagreement to participate in the screening programme.
Prevalence of CRC risk factors and risk stratification in target population.
individuals of the target population were divided into three risk groups based on survey and medical record data: high-risk (history of polyps, and/or personal/family history of CRC, increased-risk (diabetes, obesity, and/or former or current smoking status), and average-risk (45 or older with no other risk factor).
Documented on one occasion, during invitation interview, as an act on agreement to participate in the screening programme.
Performance Indicators of Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT)
the performance of Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) during the screening process was assessed in terms of participation rate,completion rate and positivity rate.
Documented on one occasion, immediately after completion of FIT testing.
Performance Indicators of Colonoscopic Examination
the performance of follow up colonoscopy during the screening process was assessed in terms of referral rate, compliance rate, completion rate and lesion detection rate.
Documented on one occasion, immediately after completion of colonoscopy examination.
Other Outcomes (5)
Quality assurance of Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT): short questionnaire
Documented on one occasion, immediately after completion of FIT testing.
Quality assurance of precolonoscopy cleansing regimen: Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale (OBPS)
Documented on one occasion, immediately after completion of colonoscopy examination.
Safety and tolerance of precolonoscopy cleansing regimen: short questionnaire
Documented on one occasion, immediately after completion of colonoscopy examination.
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Household-Open Invitation (HOI)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPrecolonoscopy cleansing regimen and referral to conventional colonoscopy is based on Positive FIT (level ≥75ng/ml) in any of the two collected samples. Histopathological examinations of screen-detected lesions are reported and lesion with the worst prognosis is indicated as the final colonoscopic outcome used for evaluation purposes. Screenees with intermediate and high risk polyp were referred to a follow-up surveillance programme.Treatments were initiated with Diltiazem hydrochloride 2%/Nitroglycerin rectal ointment for anal fissure, and tribenoside 400 mg + lidocaine 40 mg suppositories for hemorrhoids. Positive FIT results in participants who were identified with no adenomas, advance adenomas, or adenocarcinomas are considered False-positive FIT (FP-FIT) results.
Recommendation By Physician (RBP)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPrecolonoscopy cleansing regimen and referral to conventional colonoscopy is based on Positive FIT (level ≥75ng/ml) in any of the two collected samples. Histopathological examinations of screen-detected lesions are reported and lesion with the worst prognosis is indicated as the final colonoscopic outcome used for evaluation purposes. Screenees with intermediate and high risk polyp were referred to a follow-up surveillance programme.Treatments were initiated with Diltiazem hydrochloride 2%/Nitroglycerin rectal ointment for anal fissure, and tribenoside 400 mg + lidocaine 40 mg suppositories for hemorrhoids. Positive FIT results in participants who were identified with no adenomas, advance adenomas, or adenocarcinomas are considered False-positive FIT (FP-FIT) results.
Interventions
Screenees were supplied with two fecal collection devices and asked to collect two specimens from two consecutive Different Bowel Movement Samples (DBMS) or, in case of infrequent bowel movements, from the Same Bowel Movement Sample (SBMS).Instruction stressed that after collection the device must be stored in refrigerator and transported in an iced pack within no more than 48h from sampling. After checking for sampling appropriateness, the received samples were analyzed by the FOB Gold/SENTiFOB method (Sentinel Diagnostics SpA, Milan, Italy), according to the previously validated procedural platform
Laxative stimulant two days prior to the cleansing regimen involves the intake of one 10 mg tablet of bisacodyl (Dulcolax, Sanofi,UK) at 18:00 for two consecutive nights.The evening before colonoscopy cleansing started with 2 doses (at 16:00 and 20:00) of one sachet Sodium picosulphate preparations (PICOPREP, Ferring Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Zhongshan, China), dissolved in150 mL of cold water, followed with five 240 mL portions of clear liquids within 3 h. The third dose is taken in the morning about 5 h prior to colonoscopy, followed with at least three 240 mL portions of clear liquids no later than 2 h before colonoscopy.
With the colonoscopists completely blinded regarding the FIT results, conventional colonoscopy examinations were conducted in the Endoscopy Unit of Al-Kindy Polyclinic. According to the five levels of competency proposed by the European guidelines, this unit is assigned as level 2, with the possibility of removing polypoid and sessile lesions \<25 mm, providing there is good access. For flat lesions, larger sessile and polypoid lesions, and smaller lesions with more difficult access, the lesions were documented appropriately with the patients referred to higher competent units in order to be safely and expertly removed.
Adenomas were classified according to the modified revised Vienna classification for the European Guidelines. Advanced adenoma was defined as the presence of one of the following features: \>10 mm diameter, tubulovillous or villous structure, and high-grade neoplasia. Polypoid adenocarcinomas were reported according to the TNM classification, while colorectal cancer associated with flat and/or depressed lesions were reported as non-polypoid lesions, and further classified by the Paris classification. Pathologic results of hyperplastic polyps, sessile serrated lesions or post inflammatory polyps were considered normal findings.
Treatment of hemorrhoids was initiated with tribenoside 400 mg + lidocaine 40 mg suppositories, once daily for up to 2 weeks.
Treatment of anal fissure was initiated with Diltiazem hydrochloride 2%/Nitroglycerin rectal ointment applied every 12 hours, for up to six weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- residents of Baghdad city
- being ≥45 years of age with stop age of 80 years.
You may not qualify if:
- history of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
- colonoscopy (CS)/flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS)/ double contrast barium enema (DCBE) performed within the last year.
- persistent altered bowel habits.
- chronic abdominal pain.
- visible bleeding per rectum.
- long term use of anticoagulant.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Lewai S Abdulaziz
Baghdad, 10045, Iraq
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Lewai S Abdulaziz, MSc PhD
Al-Kindy college of Medicine, University of Baghdad
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Faris A Khazaal, FRCP
Al-Kindy college of Medicine, University of Baghdad
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Riyadh M Hasan, CABS
Al-Kindy college of Medicine, University of Baghdad
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohammed A Al-Kurtas, FICMS.Path
Al-Kindy college of Medicine, University of Baghdad
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 1, 2019
First Posted
July 12, 2019
Study Start
April 1, 2015
Primary Completion
May 30, 2017
Study Completion
October 30, 2017
Last Updated
September 4, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share