NCT04017845

Brief Summary

The existing evidence from epidemiological studies and randomized controlled trials has consistently assures the cost effectiveness and the influential role of screening in reducing incidence rates and deaths caused by Colorectal Cancer (CRC). Population based organized screening programmes, which should be considered an obligation that is not to be postponed, require valuable information that can be reliably extrapolated from well-designed pilot study conducted prior to programme implementation. The main objectives of the current pilot CRC screening project, named after "Al-Kindy College of Medicine", was to evaluate and explore the specific aspects of the intended population-based organized CRC screening programme, including: barriers affecting adherence to the programme, performance indicators of the proposed screening programme, the target population in which CRC screening is a legitimate healthcare priority, quality assurance of screening tests and colonoscopy services, and to propose an algorithm that will provide a clinically and logistically acceptable positivity rate.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
537

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for early_phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2015

Typical duration for early_phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2015

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 30, 2017

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 30, 2017

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 1, 2019

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 12, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

September 4, 2019

Status Verified

July 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

July 1, 2019

Last Update Submit

September 2, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Colorectal cancerScreeningFecal Immunochemical Test

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • prevalence of causes accounting for population disagreement to participate in screening. programme.

    Eligible screenees who do not have the willingness to participate were asked to identify their disagreement cause(s) from the list included in the invitation letter and reported as: 1. I don't have the will or time to be enrolled. 2. My residence is far off the program center. 3. I am afraid the program will unveil the presence of the disease. 4. I cannot accept and tolerate the tests included in the program. 5. I am not fully persuaded about the program achievability. 6. Infeasibility of freely provided medical services.

    Documented on one occasion, during invitation interview as an act on disagreement to participate in the screening programme.

  • Prevalence of CRC risk factors and risk stratification in target population.

    individuals of the target population were divided into three risk groups based on survey and medical record data: high-risk (history of polyps, and/or personal/family history of CRC, increased-risk (diabetes, obesity, and/or former or current smoking status), and average-risk (45 or older with no other risk factor).

    Documented on one occasion, during invitation interview, as an act on agreement to participate in the screening programme.

  • Performance Indicators of Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT)

    the performance of Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) during the screening process was assessed in terms of participation rate,completion rate and positivity rate.

    Documented on one occasion, immediately after completion of FIT testing.

  • Performance Indicators of Colonoscopic Examination

    the performance of follow up colonoscopy during the screening process was assessed in terms of referral rate, compliance rate, completion rate and lesion detection rate.

    Documented on one occasion, immediately after completion of colonoscopy examination.

Other Outcomes (5)

  • Quality assurance of Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT): short questionnaire

    Documented on one occasion, immediately after completion of FIT testing.

  • Quality assurance of precolonoscopy cleansing regimen: Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale (OBPS)

    Documented on one occasion, immediately after completion of colonoscopy examination.

  • Safety and tolerance of precolonoscopy cleansing regimen: short questionnaire

    Documented on one occasion, immediately after completion of colonoscopy examination.

  • +2 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Household-Open Invitation (HOI)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Precolonoscopy cleansing regimen and referral to conventional colonoscopy is based on Positive FIT (level ≥75ng/ml) in any of the two collected samples. Histopathological examinations of screen-detected lesions are reported and lesion with the worst prognosis is indicated as the final colonoscopic outcome used for evaluation purposes. Screenees with intermediate and high risk polyp were referred to a follow-up surveillance programme.Treatments were initiated with Diltiazem hydrochloride 2%/Nitroglycerin rectal ointment for anal fissure, and tribenoside 400 mg + lidocaine 40 mg suppositories for hemorrhoids. Positive FIT results in participants who were identified with no adenomas, advance adenomas, or adenocarcinomas are considered False-positive FIT (FP-FIT) results.

Diagnostic Test: FITProcedure: Precolonoscopy cleansing regimenProcedure: Conventional ColonoscopyDiagnostic Test: Histopathological examinations of screen-detected lesionsDrug: Tribenoside 400 mg + lidocaine 40 mg suppositoriesDrug: Diltiazem hydrochloride 2%/Nitroglycerin rectal ointment

Recommendation By Physician (RBP)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Precolonoscopy cleansing regimen and referral to conventional colonoscopy is based on Positive FIT (level ≥75ng/ml) in any of the two collected samples. Histopathological examinations of screen-detected lesions are reported and lesion with the worst prognosis is indicated as the final colonoscopic outcome used for evaluation purposes. Screenees with intermediate and high risk polyp were referred to a follow-up surveillance programme.Treatments were initiated with Diltiazem hydrochloride 2%/Nitroglycerin rectal ointment for anal fissure, and tribenoside 400 mg + lidocaine 40 mg suppositories for hemorrhoids. Positive FIT results in participants who were identified with no adenomas, advance adenomas, or adenocarcinomas are considered False-positive FIT (FP-FIT) results.

Diagnostic Test: FITProcedure: Precolonoscopy cleansing regimenProcedure: Conventional ColonoscopyDiagnostic Test: Histopathological examinations of screen-detected lesionsDrug: Tribenoside 400 mg + lidocaine 40 mg suppositoriesDrug: Diltiazem hydrochloride 2%/Nitroglycerin rectal ointment

Interventions

FITDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Screenees were supplied with two fecal collection devices and asked to collect two specimens from two consecutive Different Bowel Movement Samples (DBMS) or, in case of infrequent bowel movements, from the Same Bowel Movement Sample (SBMS).Instruction stressed that after collection the device must be stored in refrigerator and transported in an iced pack within no more than 48h from sampling. After checking for sampling appropriateness, the received samples were analyzed by the FOB Gold/SENTiFOB method (Sentinel Diagnostics SpA, Milan, Italy), according to the previously validated procedural platform

Also known as: Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT), Fecal occult blood tests (FOBT), FOB Gold/SENTiFOB (Sentinel Diagnostics SpA, Milan, Italy)
Household-Open Invitation (HOI)Recommendation By Physician (RBP)

Laxative stimulant two days prior to the cleansing regimen involves the intake of one 10 mg tablet of bisacodyl (Dulcolax, Sanofi,UK) at 18:00 for two consecutive nights.The evening before colonoscopy cleansing started with 2 doses (at 16:00 and 20:00) of one sachet Sodium picosulphate preparations (PICOPREP, Ferring Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Zhongshan, China), dissolved in150 mL of cold water, followed with five 240 mL portions of clear liquids within 3 h. The third dose is taken in the morning about 5 h prior to colonoscopy, followed with at least three 240 mL portions of clear liquids no later than 2 h before colonoscopy.

Also known as: PICOPREP- Adjuvant Bisacodyl Regimen
Household-Open Invitation (HOI)Recommendation By Physician (RBP)

With the colonoscopists completely blinded regarding the FIT results, conventional colonoscopy examinations were conducted in the Endoscopy Unit of Al-Kindy Polyclinic. According to the five levels of competency proposed by the European guidelines, this unit is assigned as level 2, with the possibility of removing polypoid and sessile lesions \<25 mm, providing there is good access. For flat lesions, larger sessile and polypoid lesions, and smaller lesions with more difficult access, the lesions were documented appropriately with the patients referred to higher competent units in order to be safely and expertly removed.

Also known as: Optical Colonoscopy
Household-Open Invitation (HOI)Recommendation By Physician (RBP)

Adenomas were classified according to the modified revised Vienna classification for the European Guidelines. Advanced adenoma was defined as the presence of one of the following features: \>10 mm diameter, tubulovillous or villous structure, and high-grade neoplasia. Polypoid adenocarcinomas were reported according to the TNM classification, while colorectal cancer associated with flat and/or depressed lesions were reported as non-polypoid lesions, and further classified by the Paris classification. Pathologic results of hyperplastic polyps, sessile serrated lesions or post inflammatory polyps were considered normal findings.

Also known as: Histological examinations of Lesion Biopsies and Resections
Household-Open Invitation (HOI)Recommendation By Physician (RBP)

Treatment of hemorrhoids was initiated with tribenoside 400 mg + lidocaine 40 mg suppositories, once daily for up to 2 weeks.

Also known as: PROCTO-GLYVENOL
Household-Open Invitation (HOI)Recommendation By Physician (RBP)

Treatment of anal fissure was initiated with Diltiazem hydrochloride 2%/Nitroglycerin rectal ointment applied every 12 hours, for up to six weeks.

Also known as: Topical calcium channel blockers/nitrates
Household-Open Invitation (HOI)Recommendation By Physician (RBP)

Eligibility Criteria

Age45 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • residents of Baghdad city
  • being ≥45 years of age with stop age of 80 years.

You may not qualify if:

  • history of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
  • colonoscopy (CS)/flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS)/ double contrast barium enema (DCBE) performed within the last year.
  • persistent altered bowel habits.
  • chronic abdominal pain.
  • visible bleeding per rectum.
  • long term use of anticoagulant.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Lewai S Abdulaziz

Baghdad, 10045, Iraq

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Neoplasms

Interventions

tribenosideLidocaineSuppositoriestribenoside (combination)DiltiazemCalcium Channel BlockersNitrates

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesDosage FormsPharmaceutical PreparationsBenzazepinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsMembrane Transport ModulatorsMolecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological ActionPharmacologic ActionsChemical Actions and UsesCalcium-Regulating Hormones and AgentsPhysiological Effects of DrugsCardiovascular AgentsTherapeutic UsesAnionsIonsElectrolytesInorganic ChemicalsNitric AcidNitrogen Compounds

Study Officials

  • Lewai S Abdulaziz, MSc PhD

    Al-Kindy college of Medicine, University of Baghdad

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Faris A Khazaal, FRCP

    Al-Kindy college of Medicine, University of Baghdad

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Riyadh M Hasan, CABS

    Al-Kindy college of Medicine, University of Baghdad

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Mohammed A Al-Kurtas, FICMS.Path

    Al-Kindy college of Medicine, University of Baghdad

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
early phase 1
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2019

First Posted

July 12, 2019

Study Start

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion

May 30, 2017

Study Completion

October 30, 2017

Last Updated

September 4, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations