Project My Heart Your Heart: Pacemaker Reuse
MHYH
1 other identifier
interventional
370
7 countries
8
Brief Summary
Lack of access to pacemakers is a major challenge to the provision of cardiovascular health care in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC). Post-mortem pacemaker utilization could be safe, efficacious, and ethically responsible means of delivering the needed care. Reconditioned pacemakers can provide therapy for patients with symptomatic bradycardia and no means of receiving a new device. The objective of the clinical trial is to determine if pacemaker reutilization can be shown to be a safe means of delivering pacemakers to patients in LMIC without resources. Consented patients in this multi-center trial will be randomized to undergo implantation of either a reconditioned device or a new device.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 13, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 8, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 12, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2026
CompletedJuly 4, 2025
April 1, 2025
7.2 years
July 8, 2019
July 1, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Freedom from Procedure-Related Infection at 12 months
Clinical evidence of pacemaker infection includes local signs of inflammation at the generator site such as erythema, warmth, fluctuance, tenderness, purulent drainage, wound dehiscence, or erosion. Device related endocarditis will be reported if the Duke criteria for infective endocarditis are met. Procedure-related infections will be classified as follows: pocket infection, endocarditis, recurrent bacteremia, extrusion of wires or generator
12 months post device implantation
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Freedom from Pacemaker Software or Hardware Malfunction at 12 months
12 months post device implantation
Study Arms (2)
New Device
ACTIVE COMPARATORNew pacemakers will be sourced from pacemaker manufacturers.
Reconditioned Device
EXPERIMENTALDonated devices are inspected according to specific protocols that evaluate physical and electrical (battery longevity) suitability for future use. Devices deemed to be acceptable are shipped to a third-party vendor (NEScientific) for disassembly, cleaning and re-sterilization.
Interventions
Devices from the three manufacturers below will be used.
Devices from the four manufacturers below will be used.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Life expectancy ≥ 2 years.
- Indications for device implantation must be fulfilled per standard of care. Consistent with 2008 American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association guidelines for device therapy, one of the following class I indications must be met.
- Sinus Node Dysfunction
- Acquired Atrioventricular (AV) Block
- Chronic Bifascicular Block
- Hypersensitive Carotid Syndrome
- Lack of financial ability to pay for a new device must be assessed and documented.
- All other methods of new device acquisition must be exhausted.
- Patient must be agreeable and able to follow-up with the implanting center within 2 weeks for wound check, at 2 months, 6 months, and every 6 months thereafter for routine pacemaker checks.
You may not qualify if:
- Severe valvular disease
- Severe pulmonary disease
- End-stage renal disease (creatinine clearance \< 30 mL/min) whether or not on dialysis
- Evidence of ongoing systemic infection
- Prior pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation
- Significant contraindication to pacemaker implantation per evaluation of the implanting physician (very high risk of complications).
- Presence of any other condition that the local investigator feels would be problematic or would restrict or limit the participation of the patient for the entire study period
- Pregnant women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (8)
The Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital
Eldoret, Kenya
Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon
Monterrey, Mexico
Hospital Central de Maputo
Maputo, Mozambique
LASUTH
Ikeja, Lagos, 101233, Nigeria
Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital
Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria
FUNDACOR
Asunción, Paraguay
Choithram Memorial Hospital
Freetown, Sierra Leone
ASCARDIO
Barquisimeto, Lara, 3001, Venezuela
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas Crawford, MD
University of Michigan
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2019
First Posted
July 12, 2019
Study Start
October 13, 2018
Primary Completion
January 1, 2026
Study Completion
January 1, 2026
Last Updated
July 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share