Treatment Decision-making in Patients With Recurrent High-grade Glioma
Recurrent High-grade Glioma: Experiences of Patients and Their Close Relatives During the Treatment Decision-making Process.
1 other identifier
observational
29
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This qualitative study explores the lived experience of high-grade glioma patients and their close relatives at time of recurrence. With focus on the decision-making about treatment and care..
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started May 2019
Typical duration for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 6, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 8, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 10, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 3, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 8, 2022
CompletedApril 20, 2022
April 1, 2022
11 months
July 8, 2019
April 19, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Experiences of patients and relatives
How patients and their close relatives experience the decision-making process
Interviews are performed 2-6 weeks after the decision-making
Involvement preferences
The preferences of patients and relatives for being involved in the decision-making.
Interviews are performed 2-6 weeks after the decision-making
Study Arms (2)
Patients
Patients with recurrent high-grade glioma
Relatives
Close relatives of patients with recurrent high-grade glioma
Eligibility Criteria
Two study populations: 1. \- Adult patients with recurrence of high-grade glioma who are offered surgical treatment as one of the treatment possibilities. 2. \- The adult relative most involved in the decision-making. The relative is apointed by the patient and the patient gives written concent to the relative' participation.
You may qualify if:
- The patient is offered surgical treatment (after an assesment done by the multidisciplinary team)
- Able to speak and understand danish
- Able to participate in an interview
- Able to give informed concent for participation
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with severe cognitive impairment which prohibits them from either giving informed concent or participating in interview.
- Relatives are excluded if the patient do not give concent for the participation of relatives
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Odense University Hospitallead
- Rigshospitalet, Denmarkcollaborator
- Region of Southern Denmarkcollaborator
- Danish Cancer Societycollaborator
- Novo Nordisk A/Scollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Copenhagen University Hospital; Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Denmark
Odense University Hospital
Odense, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Frantz Rom Poulsen, Professor
Department of Neurosurgery Odense University Hospital DK-5000 Odense C DENMARK
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2019
First Posted
July 10, 2019
Study Start
May 6, 2019
Primary Completion
April 3, 2020
Study Completion
April 8, 2022
Last Updated
April 20, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share