The Feasibility and Safety of Avoiding Chest Tube Placement After Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS)of the Lung
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a prospective randomized controlled trial.The main study content is the feasibility and safety of avoiding chest tube placement after Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery lung disease,participants were randomly divided into experimental group and control group.Avoiding chest tube placement after VATS of the lung in the experimental group.Indwelling thoracic drainage tube after VATS of the lung in the control group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 2, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 9, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2020
CompletedOctober 8, 2019
October 1, 2019
1 year
July 2, 2019
October 6, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
operation time
From the beginnning of ansesthesia to the end of anesthesia
1 day
hospitalization expenses
the total cost of hospitalzation
15 days
postoperative complication rate
incidence of postoperative complications such as pneumothorax and hydrohorax
a month
duration of postoperation pain
postoperative pain duration
10 days
VAS pain scores
the VAS pain score was given to patients and the pain scores were recorded at 6h,12h,24h,48h,and 72h postoperatively.The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 10.The high values represent a worse outcome.
3 days
the time of early ambulation after operation
the time from the patient's postoperative pushback to the first bedtime
1 day
postoperative extubation time
postoperative extubation time
1 day
Study Arms (2)
avoiding chest drainage tube placement after resection of lung
EXPERIMENTALThis group of patients underwent avoiding chest drainage tube placement after VATS of the lung.
indewlling chest drainage tube after resection of lung
OTHERThis group of patients underwent indewlling chest drainage tube after VATS of the lung.
Interventions
Avoiding chest drainage tube placement after VATS of the lung in the experiment group.
Indewlling chest drainage tube after VATS of lung in the control group.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- 1.Age ranges from 18 to 75 years old,do the examination of chest CT showed pulmonary disease,no invasion of peripheral blood vessels and viscera,no pleural effusion and pericardial effusion.
- Electrocardiogram, pulmonary function,color doppler ultrasound of the heart,arteries and veins of both lower limbs are normal,no potential infection was confirmed before surgery, no serious organic disease of the heart and lung,and no obvious operation contrain.
You may not qualify if:
- The lungs continue to leak air preoperation more than six days. 2.The appearment of the hemothorax,empyema and chylothorax preoperative. 3.The appearment of the preoperative chest X-ray pulmonary atelectasis and pulmonary infection.
- The lungs leak air appears in the surgery. 5.Patients with severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular accident after operation were terminated.
- Impaired lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second \[FEV1\]\<60% predicted).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Xueying Yanglead
Study Sites (1)
The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University
Shenyang, Liaoning, 110004, China
Related Publications (9)
Nakashima S, Watanabe A, Mishina T, Obama T, Mawatari T, Higami T. Feasibility and safety of postoperative management without chest tube placement after thoracoscopic wedge resection of the lung. Surg Today. 2011 Jun;41(6):774-9. doi: 10.1007/s00595-010-4346-5. Epub 2011 May 28.
PMID: 21626321RESULTHolbek BL, Hansen HJ, Kehlet H, Petersen RH. Thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection without post-operative chest drain: an observational study. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Oct;64(10):612-7. doi: 10.1007/s11748-016-0692-6. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
PMID: 27510705RESULTLi P, Shen C, Wu Y, Lai Y, Zhou K, Che G. It is safe and feasible to omit the chest tube postoperatively for selected patients receiving thoracoscopic pulmonary resection: a meta-analysis. J Thorac Dis. 2018 May;10(5):2712-2721. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.04.75.
PMID: 29997933RESULTFilosso PL, Sandri A, Guerrera F, Roffinella M, Bora G, Solidoro P. Management of Chest Drains After Thoracic Resections. Thorac Surg Clin. 2017 Feb;27(1):7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2016.08.002.
PMID: 27865329RESULTRusso L, Wiechmann RJ, Magovern JA, Szydlowski GW, Mack MJ, Naunheim KS, Landreneau RJ. Early chest tube removal after video-assisted thoracoscopic wedge resection of the lung. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Nov;66(5):1751-4. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)00946-1.
PMID: 9875783RESULTLu TY, Chen JX, Chen PR, Lin YS, Chen CK, Kao PY, Huang TM, Fang HY. Evaluation of the necessity for chest drain placement following thoracoscopic wedge resection. Surg Today. 2017 May;47(5):606-610. doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1414-5. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
PMID: 27688029RESULTWatanabe A, Watanabe T, Ohsawa H, Mawatari T, Ichimiya Y, Takahashi N, Sato H, Abe T. Avoiding chest tube placement after video-assisted thoracoscopic wedge resection of the lung. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 May;25(5):872-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.01.041.
PMID: 15082297RESULTDeng B, Qian K, Zhou JH, Tan QY, Wang RW. Optimization of Chest Tube Management to Expedite Rehabilitation of Lung Cancer Patients After Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. World J Surg. 2017 Aug;41(8):2039-2045. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3975-x.
PMID: 28289835RESULTChiappetta M, Lococo F, Nachira D, Ciavarella LP, Congedo MT, Porziella V, Meacci E, Margaritora S. Digital Devices Improve Chest Tube Management: Results from a Prospective Randomized Trial. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Oct;66(7):595-602. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1607443. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
PMID: 29078230RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Xueying Yang, M.D.
The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This is a randomized controlled trial.Partcipants,Care Provider, and Investigator all know the grouping situation.The Investigator collect the information and observation indicators of the two groups of participant and send the outcomes.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 2, 2019
First Posted
July 9, 2019
Study Start
June 1, 2019
Primary Completion
June 1, 2020
Study Completion
July 1, 2020
Last Updated
October 8, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- data will become available in the next six month
- Access Criteria
- Feasibility and Safety of Postoperative Management Without Chest Tube Placement After VATS pneumoresection
hospital cost and complications of postoperation