NCT03854773

Brief Summary

Video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has recently been evaluated as the standard surgical procedure for lung surgery. Although VATS is less painful than thoracotomy, patients may feel severe pain during the first hours at postoperative period. Analgesia management is very important for these patients in postoperative period since insufficient analgesia can cause pulmonary complications such as atelectasis, pneumonia and increased oxygen consumption. The ultrasound (US) guided erector spina plane (ESP) block is a novel interfacial plan block defined by Forero et al. at 2016. ESP block provides thoracic analgesia at T5 level and abdominal analgesia at T7-9 level. Visualization of sonoanatomy with US is easy, and the spread of local anesthesic agents can be easily seen under the erector spinae muscle (12). Thus, analgesia occurs in several dermatomes with cephalad-caudad way. In the literature, there is not still any randomized study evaluating ESP block efficiency for postoperative analgesia management after VATS. The aim of this study is to compare US-guided ESP block and TPVB for postoperative analgesia management after VATS.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 22, 2019

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 26, 2019

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2019

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

May 12, 2020

Status Verified

May 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

February 22, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 8, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Erector spinae plane blockVideo assisted thoracic surgery,Postoperative analgesia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • opioid consumption

    The primary aim is to compare perioperative and postoperative opioid consumption

    Change from Baseline Postoperative Visual Analogue Score at 48 hours

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Visual analogue scores (VAS)

    postoperative 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 48 hours

Study Arms (3)

Erector spinae block (Group ESPB)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In group A, ESP block will be performed. US probe will be placed longitudinally 2-3 cm lateral to the T5 transverse process. From superior to inferior, three muscles will be visualized on the hyperechoic transverse process; trapezius (upper), rhomboideus major (middle), erector spinae (lower). The block needle will be inserted cranio caudal direction and then for correction of the needle 5 ml saline will be injected deep into the erector spina muscle fascia. Following confirmation of the correct position of the needle 20 ml %0.25 bupivacaine will be administered for block.

Other: Erector spinae plane block (Group ESPB)

Thoracal paravertebral block group (Group TPVB)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In group B, TPVB will be performed. US probe will be placed 2-3 cm laterally following the visualization T5 spinous process in sagittal orientation. The ribs and transverse processes will be visualized as hyperechoic structures. The costotransverse ligament will be visualized in the superior, and the pleura in the anterior region. Using in plane technique, the block needle will be inserted in the cranio-caudal direction until the costotransverse ligament will be passed. For confirmation of correct position of the needle, 5 ml saline will be injected. After the negative aspiration of cerebrospinal fluid, blood and air; 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be performed and it will be seen of moving downwards of the pleura during the injection

Other: Thoracal paravertebral block (Group TPVB)

Control group (Group C)

OTHER

Patients in control group will be only received fentanyl via a patient controlled analgesia (PCA) device.

Other: Control group (group C)

Interventions

Patients will be administered A 400 mg dose of ibuprofen every 8 hours in the postoperative period. A patient controlled device prepared with 10 mcg/ ml fentanyl will be attached to all patients with a protocol included 10 mcg bolus without infusion dose, 10 min lockout time and 4 hour limit. Postoperative patient evaluation will be performed by an anesthesiologist blinded to the procedure.

Erector spinae block (Group ESPB)

Patients will be administered A 400 mg dose of ibuprofen every 8 hours in the postoperative period. A patient controlled device prepared with 10 mcg/ ml fentanyl will be attached to all patients with a protocol included 10 mcg bolus without infusion dose, 10 min lockout time and 4 hour limit. Postoperative patient evaluation will be performed by an anesthesiologist blinded to the procedure.

Thoracal paravertebral block group (Group TPVB)

Patients will be administered A 400 mg dose of ibuprofen every 8 hours in the postoperative period. A patient controlled device prepared with 10 mcg/ ml fentanyl will be attached to all patients with a protocol included 10 mcg bolus without infusion dose, 10 min lockout time and 4 hour limit. Postoperative patient evaluation will be performed by an anesthesiologist blinded to the procedure.

Control group (Group C)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II
  • scheduled for VATS under general anesthesia

You may not qualify if:

  • history of bleeding diathesis,
  • receiving anticoagulant treatment,
  • known local anesthetics and opioid allergy,
  • infection of the skin at the site of the needle puncture,
  • pregnancy or lactation,
  • patients who do not accept the procedure

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Istanbul Medipol University Hospital

Istanbul, Bagcilar, 34070, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.

    PMID: 27501016BACKGROUND
  • Forero M, Rajarathinam M, Adhikary S, Chin KJ. Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block for Rescue Analgesia in Thoracotomy After Epidural Failure: A Case Report. A A Case Rep. 2017 May 15;8(10):254-256. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000478.

    PMID: 28252539BACKGROUND
  • Vogt A, Stieger DS, Theurillat C, Curatolo M. Single-injection thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative pain treatment after thoracoscopic surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Dec;95(6):816-21. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei250. Epub 2005 Sep 30.

    PMID: 16199417BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lung Diseases

Interventions

Control Groups

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory Tract Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Epidemiologic Research DesignEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesResearch DesignMethods

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
the patient and the anesthesiologist who performs postoperative pain evaluation will not know the group.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: there are three models for this study. the first group is erector spinae plane block group. the second one is thoracal paravertebral block group. the third one is the control group.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Medical Doctor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2019

First Posted

February 26, 2019

Study Start

March 1, 2019

Primary Completion

May 1, 2020

Study Completion

May 1, 2020

Last Updated

May 12, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

we will not share IPD

Locations