Erector Spinae Plane Block and Thoracal Paravertebral Block Following Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery
Comparison Of Erector Spinae Plane Block And Thoracal Paravertebral Block For Postoperative Analgesia Management Following Vıdeo Assisted Thoracic Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has recently been evaluated as the standard surgical procedure for lung surgery. Although VATS is less painful than thoracotomy, patients may feel severe pain during the first hours at postoperative period. Analgesia management is very important for these patients in postoperative period since insufficient analgesia can cause pulmonary complications such as atelectasis, pneumonia and increased oxygen consumption. The ultrasound (US) guided erector spina plane (ESP) block is a novel interfacial plan block defined by Forero et al. at 2016. ESP block provides thoracic analgesia at T5 level and abdominal analgesia at T7-9 level. Visualization of sonoanatomy with US is easy, and the spread of local anesthesic agents can be easily seen under the erector spinae muscle (12). Thus, analgesia occurs in several dermatomes with cephalad-caudad way. In the literature, there is not still any randomized study evaluating ESP block efficiency for postoperative analgesia management after VATS. The aim of this study is to compare US-guided ESP block and TPVB for postoperative analgesia management after VATS.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 22, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2020
CompletedMay 12, 2020
May 1, 2020
1.2 years
February 22, 2019
May 8, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
opioid consumption
The primary aim is to compare perioperative and postoperative opioid consumption
Change from Baseline Postoperative Visual Analogue Score at 48 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Visual analogue scores (VAS)
postoperative 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 48 hours
Study Arms (3)
Erector spinae block (Group ESPB)
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn group A, ESP block will be performed. US probe will be placed longitudinally 2-3 cm lateral to the T5 transverse process. From superior to inferior, three muscles will be visualized on the hyperechoic transverse process; trapezius (upper), rhomboideus major (middle), erector spinae (lower). The block needle will be inserted cranio caudal direction and then for correction of the needle 5 ml saline will be injected deep into the erector spina muscle fascia. Following confirmation of the correct position of the needle 20 ml %0.25 bupivacaine will be administered for block.
Thoracal paravertebral block group (Group TPVB)
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn group B, TPVB will be performed. US probe will be placed 2-3 cm laterally following the visualization T5 spinous process in sagittal orientation. The ribs and transverse processes will be visualized as hyperechoic structures. The costotransverse ligament will be visualized in the superior, and the pleura in the anterior region. Using in plane technique, the block needle will be inserted in the cranio-caudal direction until the costotransverse ligament will be passed. For confirmation of correct position of the needle, 5 ml saline will be injected. After the negative aspiration of cerebrospinal fluid, blood and air; 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be performed and it will be seen of moving downwards of the pleura during the injection
Control group (Group C)
OTHERPatients in control group will be only received fentanyl via a patient controlled analgesia (PCA) device.
Interventions
Patients will be administered A 400 mg dose of ibuprofen every 8 hours in the postoperative period. A patient controlled device prepared with 10 mcg/ ml fentanyl will be attached to all patients with a protocol included 10 mcg bolus without infusion dose, 10 min lockout time and 4 hour limit. Postoperative patient evaluation will be performed by an anesthesiologist blinded to the procedure.
Patients will be administered A 400 mg dose of ibuprofen every 8 hours in the postoperative period. A patient controlled device prepared with 10 mcg/ ml fentanyl will be attached to all patients with a protocol included 10 mcg bolus without infusion dose, 10 min lockout time and 4 hour limit. Postoperative patient evaluation will be performed by an anesthesiologist blinded to the procedure.
Patients will be administered A 400 mg dose of ibuprofen every 8 hours in the postoperative period. A patient controlled device prepared with 10 mcg/ ml fentanyl will be attached to all patients with a protocol included 10 mcg bolus without infusion dose, 10 min lockout time and 4 hour limit. Postoperative patient evaluation will be performed by an anesthesiologist blinded to the procedure.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II
- scheduled for VATS under general anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- history of bleeding diathesis,
- receiving anticoagulant treatment,
- known local anesthetics and opioid allergy,
- infection of the skin at the site of the needle puncture,
- pregnancy or lactation,
- patients who do not accept the procedure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
Istanbul, Bagcilar, 34070, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
PMID: 27501016BACKGROUNDForero M, Rajarathinam M, Adhikary S, Chin KJ. Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block for Rescue Analgesia in Thoracotomy After Epidural Failure: A Case Report. A A Case Rep. 2017 May 15;8(10):254-256. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000478.
PMID: 28252539BACKGROUNDVogt A, Stieger DS, Theurillat C, Curatolo M. Single-injection thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative pain treatment after thoracoscopic surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Dec;95(6):816-21. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei250. Epub 2005 Sep 30.
PMID: 16199417BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- the patient and the anesthesiologist who performs postoperative pain evaluation will not know the group.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 22, 2019
First Posted
February 26, 2019
Study Start
March 1, 2019
Primary Completion
May 1, 2020
Study Completion
May 1, 2020
Last Updated
May 12, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
we will not share IPD