NCT04004845

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to see if there is a better way to induce labor.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
66

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 27, 2019

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 2, 2019

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 30, 2021

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

October 4, 2022

Status Verified

October 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

June 27, 2019

Last Update Submit

October 2, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percentage of Vaginal Deliveries

    Percent vaginal delivery within 24 hours of initiation of labor induction

    Within 24 hours

Secondary Outcomes (22)

  • Percent of vaginal delivery within 12 hours of initiating induction

    Within 12 hours

  • Percent of deliveries (vaginal or cesarean) within 12 hours of initiating induction

    Within 12 hours

  • Percent of deliveries (vaginal or cesarean) within 24 hours of initiating induction

    Within 24 hours

  • Rate of vaginal delivery

    Within 4 days

  • Rate of cesarean delivery

    Within 4 days

  • +17 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Pregnant women

We are including only women who are age 18 or over, who have a single baby (not twins), with the baby's head down, and are between 36 weeks 6 days and 42 weeks 0 days of pregnancy.

Drug: CytotecDrug: oxytocinDevice: Cervical Foley Balloon

Interventions

Misoprostol 25mcg vaginal

Also known as: misoprostol
Pregnant women

Oxytocin 10 IU/ml Solution for infusion

Also known as: Pitocin
Pregnant women

Cervical Foley will be inflated to 80cc

Pregnant women

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Pregnant women with a single baby who are having their labor induced.

You may qualify if:

  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Cephalic presentation
  • Gestational age 36 weeks 6 days- 42 weeks 0 days at initiation of induction of labor
  • Age 18 and over

You may not qualify if:

  • Preterm (less than 36 weeks 6 days) at initiation of induction of labor
  • Non-cephalic presentation
  • Major fetal anomalies or intrauterine fetal death
  • Bishop score more than 6 at initiation of induction of labor
  • Any contraindication to any agents in the induction protocol (i.e. prior cesarean delivery or myomectomy, three or more contractions per ten minute period averaged over 30 minutes at the initiation of induction of labor, low lying placenta).
  • Any contraindication to vaginal delivery
  • Latex allergic

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Montefiore Medical Center Weiler Division / Albert Einstein College of Medicine

The Bronx, New York, 10463, United States

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • How HY, Leaseburge L, Khoury JC, Siddiqi TA, Spinnato JA, Sibai BM. A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Oct;185(4):911-5. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.117358.

    PMID: 11641677BACKGROUND
  • Pimentel VM, Arabkhazaeli M, Moon JY, Wang A, Kapedani A, Bernstein PS, Tropper PJ. Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;218(6):614.e1-614.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.03.034. Epub 2018 Mar 31.

    PMID: 29614276BACKGROUND
  • Macones GA, Cahill A, Stamilio DM, Odibo AO. The efficacy of early amniotomy in nulliparous labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;207(5):403.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.032. Epub 2012 Aug 24.

    PMID: 22959833BACKGROUND
  • Wei S, Wo BL, Qi HP, Xu H, Luo ZC, Roy C, Fraser WD. Early amniotomy and early oxytocin for prevention of, or therapy for, delay in first stage spontaneous labour compared with routine care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 7;2013(8):CD006794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006794.pub4.

    PMID: 23926074BACKGROUND
  • Battarbee, A.N., Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with early amniotomy in term nulliparous labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2019. 220: p. 1.

    BACKGROUND
  • Levine LD, Downes KL, Elovitz MA, Parry S, Sammel MD, Srinivas SK. Mechanical and Pharmacologic Methods of Labor Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;128(6):1357-1364. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001778.

    PMID: 27824758BACKGROUND
  • Mackeen AD, Durie DE, Lin M, Huls CK, Qureshey E, Paglia MJ, Sun H, Sciscione A. Foley Plus Oxytocin Compared With Oxytocin for Induction After Membrane Rupture: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;131(1):4-11. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002374.

    PMID: 29215519BACKGROUND
  • Schoen CN, Saccone G, Backley S, Sandberg EM, Gu N, Delaney S, Berghella V. Increased single-balloon Foley catheter volume for induction of labor and time to delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Sep;97(9):1051-1060. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13353. Epub 2018 Apr 25.

    PMID: 29607491BACKGROUND
  • Battarbee AN, Palatnik A, Peress DA, Grobman WA. Association of Early Amniotomy After Foley Balloon Catheter Ripening and Duration of Nulliparous Labor Induction. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;128(3):592-597. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001563.

    PMID: 27500341BACKGROUND
  • Yee LM, Sandoval G, Bailit J, Reddy UM, Wapner RJ, Varner MW, Caritis SN, Prasad M, Tita ATN, Saade G, Sorokin Y, Rouse DJ, Blackwell SC, Tolosa JE; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes With Early Compared With Delayed Pushing Among Nulliparous Women. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;128(5):1039-1047. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001683.

    PMID: 27741203BACKGROUND
  • Cahill AG, Srinivas SK, Tita ATN, Caughey AB, Richter HE, Gregory WT, Liu J, Woolfolk C, Weinstein DL, Mathur AM, Macones GA, Tuuli MG. Effect of Immediate vs Delayed Pushing on Rates of Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery Among Nulliparous Women Receiving Neuraxial Analgesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Oct 9;320(14):1444-1454. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13986.

    PMID: 30304425BACKGROUND
  • Simpson LL, Rochelson B, Ananth CV, Bernstein PS, D'Alton M, Chazotte C, Lavery JA, Zielinski K; Safe Motherhood Initiative Severe Hypertension in Pregnancy Work Group. Safe Motherhood Initiative: Early Impact of Severe Hypertension in Pregnancy Bundle Implementation. AJP Rep. 2018 Oct;8(4):e212-e218. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1673632. Epub 2018 Oct 11.

    PMID: 30319925BACKGROUND
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College); Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine; Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;210(3):179-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.026.

    PMID: 24565430BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

MisoprostolOxytocin

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Prostaglandins E, SyntheticProstaglandins, SyntheticProstaglandinsEicosanoidsFatty Acids, UnsaturatedFatty AcidsLipidsAutacoidsInflammation MediatorsBiological FactorsPituitary Hormones, PosteriorPituitary HormonesPeptide HormonesHormonesHormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone AntagonistsPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins

Study Officials

  • Peter Bernstein, MD

    Montefiore Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2019

First Posted

July 2, 2019

Study Start

March 30, 2021

Primary Completion

June 1, 2022

Study Completion

June 1, 2022

Last Updated

October 4, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations