Study Stopped
Study was temporarily paused due to COVID19 and ultimately terminated at the discretion of the PI
Labor Protocol Study
Effect of a Labor Induction Protocol on Vaginal Delivery Rate
1 other identifier
observational
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to see if there is a better way to induce labor.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Mar 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 27, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 2, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 30, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2022
CompletedOctober 4, 2022
October 1, 2022
1.2 years
June 27, 2019
October 2, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Vaginal Deliveries
Percent vaginal delivery within 24 hours of initiation of labor induction
Within 24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (22)
Percent of vaginal delivery within 12 hours of initiating induction
Within 12 hours
Percent of deliveries (vaginal or cesarean) within 12 hours of initiating induction
Within 12 hours
Percent of deliveries (vaginal or cesarean) within 24 hours of initiating induction
Within 24 hours
Rate of vaginal delivery
Within 4 days
Rate of cesarean delivery
Within 4 days
- +17 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Pregnant women
We are including only women who are age 18 or over, who have a single baby (not twins), with the baby's head down, and are between 36 weeks 6 days and 42 weeks 0 days of pregnancy.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Pregnant women with a single baby who are having their labor induced.
You may qualify if:
- Singleton pregnancy
- Cephalic presentation
- Gestational age 36 weeks 6 days- 42 weeks 0 days at initiation of induction of labor
- Age 18 and over
You may not qualify if:
- Preterm (less than 36 weeks 6 days) at initiation of induction of labor
- Non-cephalic presentation
- Major fetal anomalies or intrauterine fetal death
- Bishop score more than 6 at initiation of induction of labor
- Any contraindication to any agents in the induction protocol (i.e. prior cesarean delivery or myomectomy, three or more contractions per ten minute period averaged over 30 minutes at the initiation of induction of labor, low lying placenta).
- Any contraindication to vaginal delivery
- Latex allergic
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Montefiore Medical Center Weiler Division / Albert Einstein College of Medicine
The Bronx, New York, 10463, United States
Related Publications (13)
How HY, Leaseburge L, Khoury JC, Siddiqi TA, Spinnato JA, Sibai BM. A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Oct;185(4):911-5. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.117358.
PMID: 11641677BACKGROUNDPimentel VM, Arabkhazaeli M, Moon JY, Wang A, Kapedani A, Bernstein PS, Tropper PJ. Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;218(6):614.e1-614.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.03.034. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
PMID: 29614276BACKGROUNDMacones GA, Cahill A, Stamilio DM, Odibo AO. The efficacy of early amniotomy in nulliparous labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;207(5):403.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.032. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
PMID: 22959833BACKGROUNDWei S, Wo BL, Qi HP, Xu H, Luo ZC, Roy C, Fraser WD. Early amniotomy and early oxytocin for prevention of, or therapy for, delay in first stage spontaneous labour compared with routine care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 7;2013(8):CD006794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006794.pub4.
PMID: 23926074BACKGROUNDBattarbee, A.N., Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with early amniotomy in term nulliparous labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2019. 220: p. 1.
BACKGROUNDLevine LD, Downes KL, Elovitz MA, Parry S, Sammel MD, Srinivas SK. Mechanical and Pharmacologic Methods of Labor Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;128(6):1357-1364. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001778.
PMID: 27824758BACKGROUNDMackeen AD, Durie DE, Lin M, Huls CK, Qureshey E, Paglia MJ, Sun H, Sciscione A. Foley Plus Oxytocin Compared With Oxytocin for Induction After Membrane Rupture: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;131(1):4-11. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002374.
PMID: 29215519BACKGROUNDSchoen CN, Saccone G, Backley S, Sandberg EM, Gu N, Delaney S, Berghella V. Increased single-balloon Foley catheter volume for induction of labor and time to delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Sep;97(9):1051-1060. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13353. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
PMID: 29607491BACKGROUNDBattarbee AN, Palatnik A, Peress DA, Grobman WA. Association of Early Amniotomy After Foley Balloon Catheter Ripening and Duration of Nulliparous Labor Induction. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;128(3):592-597. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001563.
PMID: 27500341BACKGROUNDYee LM, Sandoval G, Bailit J, Reddy UM, Wapner RJ, Varner MW, Caritis SN, Prasad M, Tita ATN, Saade G, Sorokin Y, Rouse DJ, Blackwell SC, Tolosa JE; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes With Early Compared With Delayed Pushing Among Nulliparous Women. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;128(5):1039-1047. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001683.
PMID: 27741203BACKGROUNDCahill AG, Srinivas SK, Tita ATN, Caughey AB, Richter HE, Gregory WT, Liu J, Woolfolk C, Weinstein DL, Mathur AM, Macones GA, Tuuli MG. Effect of Immediate vs Delayed Pushing on Rates of Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery Among Nulliparous Women Receiving Neuraxial Analgesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Oct 9;320(14):1444-1454. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13986.
PMID: 30304425BACKGROUNDSimpson LL, Rochelson B, Ananth CV, Bernstein PS, D'Alton M, Chazotte C, Lavery JA, Zielinski K; Safe Motherhood Initiative Severe Hypertension in Pregnancy Work Group. Safe Motherhood Initiative: Early Impact of Severe Hypertension in Pregnancy Bundle Implementation. AJP Rep. 2018 Oct;8(4):e212-e218. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1673632. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
PMID: 30319925BACKGROUNDAmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College); Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine; Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;210(3):179-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.026.
PMID: 24565430BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peter Bernstein, MD
Montefiore Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 27, 2019
First Posted
July 2, 2019
Study Start
March 30, 2021
Primary Completion
June 1, 2022
Study Completion
June 1, 2022
Last Updated
October 4, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share