Endoscopic Ultrasound vs Percutaneous Route for Liver Biopsy
Randomized Trial Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Liver Biopsy vs. Percutaneous Liver Biopsy
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is to evaluate and directly compare the technical success, tissue quality, diagnostic efficacy and safety profile of Percutaneous and Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Liver Biopsy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 5, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 25, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 11, 2022
CompletedFebruary 24, 2022
February 1, 2022
1.4 years
June 5, 2019
February 22, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic adequacy of the tissue sample
The primary outcome of the randomized trial is to compare between EUS-LB and PC-LB, the rate of procurement of diagnostically adequate specimens, defined as the presence of both maximum specimen length ≥ 25mm AND total no. of complete portal tracts ≥ 11.
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Specimen length
24 hours
Portal tracts
24 hours
Rates of specimen adequacy
24 hours
Cross over
1 week, 30 days
Procedure duration
24 hours
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Percutaneous Biopsy
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe subject would undergo the standard of care procedure for a percutaneous biopsy of the liver. All percutaneous biopsies will be performed after administration of local anesthetic. No pre-procedure antibiotics will be administered. Subcostal or subxyphoid area will be cleaned and draped in the standard manner. 2% lidocaine solution will be injected subcutaneously using a 25-gauge needle and then administered into the subcutaneous tissue up to the liver capsule. A 16-gauge biopsy needle is inserted into the liver parenchyma under US or CT-guidance, with the location of needle placement left to the discretion of the performing radiologist. One or two core biopsy samples will be obtained. All procured specimens will be placed in a single specimen container of 10% formalin for tissue processing. When biopsy samples have been obtained, the patient will be taken to the recovery area for post-procedure monitoring.
Endoscopic-guided Ultrasound Biopsy
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe subject would undergo the standard of care procedure for an endoscopic-guided biopsy of the liver. The left lobe of the liver is identified from the gastric lumen, EUS-guided fine needle biopsy (FNB) will be performed using a 19-gauge FNB needle, with the choice of needle type at the discretion of the performing endoscopist. Stylet will only be used to puncture the liver at the time of the first pass and then subsequently removed. No suction will be used. Fanning technique will not be used. A total of 10 to-and-fro needle movements will be performed during each pass. A total of two passes will be performed.All tissue specimens procured will be placed in a single specimen container of 10% formalin for tissue processing. When two passes are complete under EUS-guidance, the echoendoscope will be withdrawn from the patient and the patient will be taken to the recovery area for post-procedure monitoring.
Interventions
Liver biopsy (LB) is essential for the diagnosis and evaluation of a variety of hepatic conditions, such as grading/staging of chronic liver disease secondary to alcohol, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, viral hepatitis, hemochromatosis, Wilson's disease, cholestatic liver disease, as well as in elucidating the etiology of elevation in liver tests.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients referred for liver biopsy for any reason
- Informed consent obtained from the patient
- ≥ 18 years old
- Able to undergo conscious sedation for EUS procedure
You may not qualify if:
- \<18 years old
- Unable to obtain informed consent from the patient
- Medically unfit for sedation
- Pregnant patients
- Presence of a mass lesion in the liver requiring biopsy visualized on cross-sectional imaging
- Irreversible coagulopathy as determined by platelet count \< 50,000 mm3 or International Normalized Ratio (INR) \> 1.5
- Unable to stop anticoagulation or anti-platelet therapy for 5 days prior to the procedure
- Hemophilia
- Presence of an alternative etiology for elevated liver tests seen during liver biopsy, e.g. choledocholithiasis discovered during EUS examination
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- AdventHealthlead
Study Sites (1)
Center for Interventional Endoscopy
Orlando, Florida, 32803, United States
Related Publications (8)
Bravo AA, Sheth SG, Chopra S. Liver biopsy. N Engl J Med. 2001 Feb 15;344(7):495-500. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200102153440706. No abstract available.
PMID: 11172192BACKGROUNDRockey DC, Caldwell SH, Goodman ZD, Nelson RC, Smith AD; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Liver biopsy. Hepatology. 2009 Mar;49(3):1017-44. doi: 10.1002/hep.22742. No abstract available.
PMID: 19243014BACKGROUNDDiehl DL. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Liver Biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2019 Apr;29(2):173-186. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2018.11.002. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
PMID: 30846147BACKGROUNDPineda JJ, Diehl DL, Miao CL, Johal AS, Khara HS, Bhanushali A, Chen EZ. EUS-guided liver biopsy provides diagnostic samples comparable with those via the percutaneous or transjugular route. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Feb;83(2):360-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.025. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
PMID: 26301407BACKGROUNDTublin ME, Blair R, Martin J, Malik S, Ruppert K, Demetris A. Prospective Study of the Impact of Liver Biopsy Core Size on Specimen Adequacy and Procedural Complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Jan;210(1):183-188. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.17792. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
PMID: 29091001BACKGROUNDHall TC, Deakin C, Atwal GS, Singh RK. Adequacy of percutaneous non-targeted liver biopsy under real-time ultrasound guidance when comparing the Biopince and Achieve biopsy needle. Br J Radiol. 2017 Dec;90(1080):20170397. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170397. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
PMID: 28972801BACKGROUNDMohan BP, Shakhatreh M, Garg R, Ponnada S, Adler DG. Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided liver biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Feb;89(2):238-246.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.018. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
PMID: 30389469BACKGROUNDWyatt J, Hubscher S, Bellamy C. Tissue pathways for liver biopsies for the investigation of medical disease and for focal lesions. London, UK: The Royal College of Pathologists; 2014.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Muhammad Hasan, MD
AdventHealth
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- The pathologist will be blinded to the procedure received by the patient.
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 5, 2019
First Posted
July 1, 2019
Study Start
July 25, 2019
Primary Completion
December 31, 2020
Study Completion
February 11, 2022
Last Updated
February 24, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no plan to share IPD.