Study Stopped
A competing study made it challenging to enroll subjects.
Liver Biopsy Using a 19 Gauge Fine Needle Biopsy Needle
Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Liver Biopsy Using a 19-gauge Fine Needle Biopsy Needle
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A 19 gauge FNB needle, using same technique as with 22 gauge needle, to obtain liver histological specimen in regards to core length and the number of Complete Portal Triads.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Mar 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 20, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 25, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 10, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 22, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 22, 2019
CompletedJuly 16, 2020
July 1, 2020
8 months
March 25, 2019
July 15, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic adequacy
Determine the diagnostic adequacy of the liver biopsy specimen by obtaining a histological specimen using a smaller (19 G) caliber needle. Diagnostic adequacy is defined as a sample that provides definitive pathological diagnosis (yes, no).
At time of procedure
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Technique
At time of procedure
Suction
At time of procedure
Number of passes
At time of procedure
Needle Dysfunction
At time of procedure
Technical failure
At time of procedure
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
19 Gauge needle liver biopsy
EXPERIMENTALObtaining liver tissue with a 19 gauge core needle
Interventions
Obtaining liver tissue with a 19 gauge core needle and whether a good core biopsy can be obtained without the use of suction and secondly to determine the diagnostic yield and safety of 19 gauge core needle for liver biopsy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients referred to Florida Hospital Endoscopy Unit for assessment of elevated liver tests with EUS and are found to have no obstructive lesion to explain elevation of liver tests and will not require ERCP.
- Age ≥ 19 years
- Willing to provide informed consent verbal or written.
You may not qualify if:
- Age \<19 years
- Unable to safely undergo EUS for any reason
- Coagulopathy (INR \>1.6, Thrombocytopenia with platelet count \<50,000/ml) for subjects on anti-coagulation therapy.
- Unwilling or cognitively unable to provide informed consent verbal or written.
- Pregnancy (confirmed with Standard of Care urine pregnancy test for all women with child-bearing potential only)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- AdventHealthlead
Study Sites (1)
Center for Interventional Endoscopy - Florida Hospital
Orlando, Florida, 32803, United States
Related Publications (17)
Rockey DC, Caldwell SH, Goodman ZD, Nelson RC, Smith AD; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Liver biopsy. Hepatology. 2009 Mar;49(3):1017-44. doi: 10.1002/hep.22742. No abstract available.
PMID: 19243014BACKGROUNDKalambokis G, Manousou P, Vibhakorn S, Marelli L, Cholongitas E, Senzolo M, Patch D, Burroughs AK. Transjugular liver biopsy--indications, adequacy, quality of specimens, and complications--a systematic review. J Hepatol. 2007 Aug;47(2):284-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2007.05.001. Epub 2007 May 24.
PMID: 17561303BACKGROUNDMathew A. EUS-guided routine liver biopsy in selected patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Oct;102(10):2354-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01353_7.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 17897349BACKGROUNDGleeson FC, Clayton AC, Zhang L, Clain JE, Gores GJ, Rajan E, Smyrk TC, Topazian MD, Wang KK, Wiersema MJ, Levy MJ. Adequacy of endoscopic ultrasound core needle biopsy specimen of nonmalignant hepatic parenchymal disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Dec;6(12):1437-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.07.015. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
PMID: 19081532BACKGROUNDDewitt J, McGreevy K, Cummings O, Sherman S, Leblanc JK, McHenry L, Al-Haddad M, Chalasani N. Initial experience with EUS-guided Tru-cut biopsy of benign liver disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 1):535-42. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.056.
PMID: 19231495BACKGROUNDStavropoulos SN, Im GY, Jlayer Z, Harris MD, Pitea TC, Turi GK, Malet PF, Friedel DM, Grendell JH. High yield of same-session EUS-guided liver biopsy by 19-gauge FNA needle in patients undergoing EUS to exclude biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Feb;75(2):310-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.043.
PMID: 22248599BACKGROUNDNakai Y, Samarasena JB, Iwashita T, Park DH, Lee JG, Hu KQ, Chang KJ. Autoimmune hepatitis diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy using a new 19-gauge histology needle. Endoscopy. 2012;44 Suppl 2 UCTN:E67-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291567. Epub 2012 Mar 6. No abstract available.
PMID: 22396285BACKGROUNDDiehl DL, Johal AS, Khara HS, Stavropoulos SN, Al-Haddad M, Ramesh J, Varadarajulu S, Aslanian H, Gordon SR, Shieh FK, Pineda-Bonilla JJ, Dunkelberger T, Gondim DD, Chen EZ. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: a multicenter experience. Endosc Int Open. 2015 Jun;3(3):E210-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391412. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
PMID: 26171433BACKGROUNDMaharaj B, Maharaj RJ, Leary WP, Cooppan RM, Naran AD, Pirie D, Pudifin DJ. Sampling variability and its influence on the diagnostic yield of percutaneous needle biopsy of the liver. Lancet. 1986 Mar 8;1(8480):523-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90883-4.
PMID: 2869260BACKGROUNDMohan BP, Shakhatreh M, Garg R, Ponnada S, Adler DG. Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided liver biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Feb;89(2):238-246.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.018. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
PMID: 30389469BACKGROUNDGor N, Salem SB, Jakate S, Patel R, Shah N, Patil A. Histological adequacy of EUS-guided liver biopsy when using a 19-gauge non-Tru-Cut FNA needle. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Jan;79(1):170-2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.06.031. Epub 2013 Jul 31. No abstract available.
PMID: 23916397BACKGROUNDSey MS, Al-Haddad M, Imperiale TF, McGreevy K, Lin J, DeWitt JM. EUS-guided liver biopsy for parenchymal disease: a comparison of diagnostic yield between two core biopsy needles. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Feb;83(2):347-52. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.012. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
PMID: 26278654BACKGROUNDNieto J, Khaleel H, Challita Y, Jimenez M, Baron TH, Walters L, Hathaway K, Patel K, Lankarani A, Herman M, Holloman D, Saab S. EUS-guided fine-needle core liver biopsy sampling using a novel 19-gauge needle with modified 1-pass, 1 actuation wet suction technique. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Feb;87(2):469-475. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 May 24.
PMID: 28551024BACKGROUNDShah ND, Sasatomi E, Baron TH. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Parenchymal Liver Biopsy: Single Center Experience of a New Dedicated Core Needle. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 May;15(5):784-786. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Jan 23. No abstract available.
PMID: 28126424BACKGROUNDLee WJ, Uradomo LT, Zhang Y, Twaddell W, Darwin P. Comparison of the Diagnostic Yield of EUS Needles for Liver Biopsy: Ex Vivo Study. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2017;2017:1497831. doi: 10.1155/2017/1497831. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
PMID: 29056843BACKGROUNDSchulman AR, Thompson CC, Odze R, Chan WW, Ryou M. Optimizing EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling: comprehensive assessment of needle types and tissue acquisition techniques. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Feb;85(2):419-426. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.07.065. Epub 2016 Aug 13.
PMID: 27530070BACKGROUNDRombaoa C CA. Mo1351 The safety and feasibileity of endoscopic ultrasound-guided parenchymal liver biopsy at a large community hospital. Gastrointestinal endoscopy; 87(6): AB458.
BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Muhammad Hasan, MD
Florida Hospital (AdventHealth Orlando)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 25, 2019
First Posted
April 10, 2019
Study Start
March 20, 2019
Primary Completion
November 22, 2019
Study Completion
November 22, 2019
Last Updated
July 16, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no plan to share individual patient data.