Reducing Older Adults' Sedentary Behavior by Self-monitoring
Users' Experiences and Preliminary Efficacy of a Self-monitoring Tool to Reduce Sedentary Behavior in Older Adults: a Mixed-methods Study
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The first aim of this study is to gain insight into older adults' perceptions towards a self-monitoring tool aimed at the reduction of sedentary behavior. Secondly, this study aimed to investigate the preliminary efficacy of a self-monitoring tool aimed at the reduction of sedentary behavior.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 13, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 19, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 8, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 20, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 1, 2019
CompletedJuly 1, 2019
June 1, 2019
19 days
March 13, 2019
June 28, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Total sedentary behavior
Total sedentary behavior was objectively estimated by means of the ActivPAL inclinometer (PAL Technologies, Glasgow, UK). The inclinometer was attached on the midline of the right anterior thigh. Participants were instructed to wear the inclinometer for seven consecutive days (24h/day) both at baseline, and at post measurement.
Pretest - posttest (4 weeks)
Perceptions of (reducing) sedentary behavior
Perceptions of older adults' towards reducing sedentary behavior by means of a self-monitoring tool will be assessed using a semi-structured interview. The interview guide has been developed by the principal investigator and includes open questions regarding older adults' perceptions towards 1) sedentary behavior, 2) using self-monitoring to reduce sedentary behavior and 3) the Activator (i.e. the self-monitoring tool used in our study). Examples of questions are: What are your perceptions regarding the Activator? Did you enjoy receiving feedback on your sitting time every day? Etc.
Posttest (4 weeks)
Domain-specific sedentary behavior
Domain-specific sedentary behaviors were assessed using a questionnaire developed by Busschaert et al. Concretely, week and weekend day sedentary behaviors were asked using the following question: 'During the last 7 days, how much time did you usually spend sitting while (1) reading, (2) caring, (3) practicing hobbies, (4) socializing, (5) listening to/playing music, (6) consuming meals, (7) watching television, (8) using a computer, (9) moving from one place to another, (10) doing household activities (11) making phone calls.
Pretest - posttest (4 weeks)
Study Arms (1)
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALSelf-monitoring tool (Activator) and general information
Interventions
Participants will receive a self-monitoring tool (i.e. the Activator) aimed at the reduction of sedentary behavior. Participants will be able to use the self-monitoring tool for four weeks. Apart from that, participants will receive general sedentary behavior information and an explanation on how to use the self-monitoring tool.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- be at least 60 years old
- be Dutch-speaking
- be able to walk 100 meters without severe difficulties
- have a smartphone
You may not qualify if:
- \- having functional limitations to stand up
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- VakgroepBewegingsEnSportwetenschappenlead
- University Ghentcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Ghent University
Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, 9000, Belgium
Related Publications (2)
Compernolle S, Van Dyck D, Cardon G, Brondeel R. Exploring Breaks in Sedentary Behavior of Older Adults Immediately After Receiving Personalized Haptic Feedback: Intervention Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 May 10;9(5):e26387. doi: 10.2196/26387.
PMID: 33970109DERIVEDCompernolle S, Cardon G, van der Ploeg HP, Van Nassau F, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Jelsma JJ, Brondeel R, Van Dyck D. Engagement, Acceptability, Usability, and Preliminary Efficacy of a Self-Monitoring Mobile Health Intervention to Reduce Sedentary Behavior in Belgian Older Adults: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Oct 29;8(10):e18653. doi: 10.2196/18653.
PMID: 33118951DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Greet Cardon, Prof.
University Ghent
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of the Department - Prof. Greet Cardon
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 13, 2019
First Posted
July 1, 2019
Study Start
April 19, 2019
Primary Completion
May 8, 2019
Study Completion
June 20, 2019
Last Updated
July 1, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share