NCT04003233

Brief Summary

The primary aim of this study is to investigate the limited efficacy of these innovative surgical solutions in treatment of Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) in terms of maintaining reduction while maintaining spinal growth. The secondary aim is to compare both devices for these and other parameters as well as safety.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 7, 2019

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 1, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2019

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2022

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

March 23, 2020

Status Verified

March 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

June 7, 2019

Last Update Submit

March 18, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Growth friendly systemDistraction systemEarly Onset ScoliosisUnilateral

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Limited-efficacy of SDS and MID-C in terms of curve correction maintenance: changes in cobb angle

    changes in cobb angle on radiographs post-op and at 4 weeks, 3 months and 12 months follow-up (FU). A maximum of 5 degrees increase will be the threshold to define maintenance.

    Until 1 year post-operative FU

  • Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events of SDS and MID-C

    Reported treatment related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) per-operatively and at 4 weeks, 3 months and 12 months FU.

    Until 1 year post-operative FU

Secondary Outcomes (13)

  • Limited-efficacy of SDS and MID-C in terms of spinal length

    Until 1 year post-operative FU

  • SDS vs. MID-C with respect to limited-efficacy in terms of curve correction maintenance

    Until 1 year post-operative FU

  • SDS vs. MID-C with respect to limited-efficacy in terms of spinal length

    Until 1 year post-operative FU

  • SDS vs. MID-C with respect to the incidence of Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events

    Until 1 year post-operative FU

  • SDS vs. MID-C with respect to surgery time

    Until 1 year post-operative FU

  • +8 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Spring Distraction System

EXPERIMENTAL

The SDS device will be implanted during a scoliosis correction operation.

Device: SDS

Minimal Invasive Deformity Correction system

EXPERIMENTAL

The MID-C device will be implanted during a scoliosis correction operation.

Device: MID-C

Interventions

SDSDEVICE

The SDS will be added to a traditional growing rod (TGR) of 4.5 or 5.5mm.

Spring Distraction System
MID-CDEVICE

The MID-C system consists of a unilateral one-way ratchet rod that is connected to the spine with polyaxial connectors

Minimal Invasive Deformity Correction system

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Years - 12 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Ambulant skeletally immature children, 6-12 yrs. of age, with open triradiate cartilages on X-ray
  • Scoliosis diagnosis prior to the age 10
  • Diagnosis of idiopathic or mild syndromic scoliosis (e.g. 22q11DS, Trisomy 21 or 9, Coffin-Siris)
  • Progressive scoliosis qualified for growth system surgery
  • One curve for treatment with an apex below Th5 and a proximal end vertebra below Th2
  • The primary curve must be between 35 and 75 degrees coronal Cobb angle
  • The primary curve must be non-rigid (i.e. the curve reduces on bending X-rays to \<35 degrees or reduces \>30% )
  • Normal or hypokyphotic sagittal alignment (Th5 -Th12 \< 50 degrees) on lateral X-rays

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with an obvious neuromuscular disease
  • Patients that are severely mentally retarded
  • Patients with a scoliosis that extends to the pelvis or the cervicothoracic region
  • Patients with a main curve of more than 8 vertebra Cobb to Cobb
  • Patients with a skeletal dysplasia that effects growth (e.g. achondroplasia, SED)
  • Patients with a systemic disease which severely influences bone quality (e.g. osteogenesis imperfecta, metabolic diseases)
  • Patients with soft tissue weakness (e.g. Ehler Danlos, Marfan, Neurofibromatosis, Prader Willi)
  • Patients with an active systemic disease such as Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis, HIV or oncologic treatment
  • Patients with a previous surgical fusion of the spine

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Amsterdam UMC

Amsterdam, North Holland, 1105 AZ, Netherlands

Location

UMC Utrecht

Utrecht, 3584 CX, Netherlands

Location

Study Officials

  • Moyo C Kruyt, MD, PhD

    UMC Utrecht

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Participants are blinded to the medical device till the surgery. After the surgery participants are able to see which medical device is implanted on X-rays.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants will be randomized and assigned to either SDS or MID-C.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2019

First Posted

July 1, 2019

Study Start

July 1, 2019

Primary Completion

July 1, 2022

Study Completion

December 1, 2022

Last Updated

March 23, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations