Study Stopped
Due to the termination of the collaboration of ApiFix ltd. and the UMC Utrecht
Limited-efficacy Testing of Spring Distraction System (SDS) and Unilateral One-way Rod (MID-C) for Early Onset Scoliosis
UniPOWR
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The primary aim of this study is to investigate the limited efficacy of these innovative surgical solutions in treatment of Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) in terms of maintaining reduction while maintaining spinal growth. The secondary aim is to compare both devices for these and other parameters as well as safety.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jul 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 7, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2022
CompletedMarch 23, 2020
March 1, 2020
3 years
June 7, 2019
March 18, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Limited-efficacy of SDS and MID-C in terms of curve correction maintenance: changes in cobb angle
changes in cobb angle on radiographs post-op and at 4 weeks, 3 months and 12 months follow-up (FU). A maximum of 5 degrees increase will be the threshold to define maintenance.
Until 1 year post-operative FU
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events of SDS and MID-C
Reported treatment related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) per-operatively and at 4 weeks, 3 months and 12 months FU.
Until 1 year post-operative FU
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Limited-efficacy of SDS and MID-C in terms of spinal length
Until 1 year post-operative FU
SDS vs. MID-C with respect to limited-efficacy in terms of curve correction maintenance
Until 1 year post-operative FU
SDS vs. MID-C with respect to limited-efficacy in terms of spinal length
Until 1 year post-operative FU
SDS vs. MID-C with respect to the incidence of Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events
Until 1 year post-operative FU
SDS vs. MID-C with respect to surgery time
Until 1 year post-operative FU
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Spring Distraction System
EXPERIMENTALThe SDS device will be implanted during a scoliosis correction operation.
Minimal Invasive Deformity Correction system
EXPERIMENTALThe MID-C device will be implanted during a scoliosis correction operation.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ambulant skeletally immature children, 6-12 yrs. of age, with open triradiate cartilages on X-ray
- Scoliosis diagnosis prior to the age 10
- Diagnosis of idiopathic or mild syndromic scoliosis (e.g. 22q11DS, Trisomy 21 or 9, Coffin-Siris)
- Progressive scoliosis qualified for growth system surgery
- One curve for treatment with an apex below Th5 and a proximal end vertebra below Th2
- The primary curve must be between 35 and 75 degrees coronal Cobb angle
- The primary curve must be non-rigid (i.e. the curve reduces on bending X-rays to \<35 degrees or reduces \>30% )
- Normal or hypokyphotic sagittal alignment (Th5 -Th12 \< 50 degrees) on lateral X-rays
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with an obvious neuromuscular disease
- Patients that are severely mentally retarded
- Patients with a scoliosis that extends to the pelvis or the cervicothoracic region
- Patients with a main curve of more than 8 vertebra Cobb to Cobb
- Patients with a skeletal dysplasia that effects growth (e.g. achondroplasia, SED)
- Patients with a systemic disease which severely influences bone quality (e.g. osteogenesis imperfecta, metabolic diseases)
- Patients with soft tissue weakness (e.g. Ehler Danlos, Marfan, Neurofibromatosis, Prader Willi)
- Patients with an active systemic disease such as Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis, HIV or oncologic treatment
- Patients with a previous surgical fusion of the spine
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- UMC Utrechtlead
- Apifixcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1105 AZ, Netherlands
UMC Utrecht
Utrecht, 3584 CX, Netherlands
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Moyo C Kruyt, MD, PhD
UMC Utrecht
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants are blinded to the medical device till the surgery. After the surgery participants are able to see which medical device is implanted on X-rays.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 7, 2019
First Posted
July 1, 2019
Study Start
July 1, 2019
Primary Completion
July 1, 2022
Study Completion
December 1, 2022
Last Updated
March 23, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share