Is Aminophylline More Effective Than Neostigmine/Atropine Mixture in the Treatment of Post-dural Puncture Headache
RCT
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of IV aminophylline versus IV neostigmine/atropine mixture in the treatment of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). Background: PDPH is the most frequent complication of procedures associated with dural puncture for spinal anesthesia or following accidental dural puncture during epidural anesthesia. Since invasive treatments have known complications, pharmacologic management may be preferable. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, phase four clinical trial; carried out on 60 patients presented with PDPH at our hospital. Patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups (30 patients each); group A, received IV aminophylline, and group NA, received IV neostigmine/atropine mixture.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jan 2019
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 20, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 25, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2020
CompletedFebruary 5, 2020
February 1, 2020
1 year
June 20, 2019
February 4, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Median and Range of Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score
NPRS measures the severity of PDPH, it is a 11 point scale from 0-10; where 0=No pain and 10=Worst possible pain (before, 2h, 6h, 12h, then every 12h till 48h)
48 hours after initiation of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Mean and Standard deviation of PDPH duration (hours) (mean±SD)
48 hours after initiation of treatment
Number of participants and Rate of Treatment-related complications
48 hours after initiation of treatment
Study Arms (2)
Group A (n=30)
ACTIVE COMPARATORAminophylline group
Group NA (n=30)
ACTIVE COMPARATORNeostigmine/Atropine group
Interventions
IV Neostigmine/Atropine mixture (20 μg/kg Neostigmine + 10 μg/kg Atropine)/8h
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with NPRS score of ≥ 5
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status ≤ II
- Age from 21 to 50 years
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with NPRS score \< 5
- ASA physical status \> II
- Age \< 21 years or \> 50 years
- Pregnant women
- History of; chronic headache, Cluster headache, Migraine
- History of; Convulsions, Cerebrovascular accident, Previous neurological diseases
- Signs of meningismus
- Bronchial asthma
- Arrhythmia
- Hypertension
- Ischemic heart disease
- Hyperthyroidism
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Damanhour Teaching Hospital
Damanhūr, El-Beheira, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ahmed M Shaat, MD
Damanhour Teaching Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 20, 2019
First Posted
June 25, 2019
Study Start
January 1, 2019
Primary Completion
January 1, 2020
Study Completion
January 1, 2020
Last Updated
February 5, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02