NCT02394457

Brief Summary

PDPH is a common problem after either intentional or unintentional Dural puncture. It is especially common in young female patients and in patients undergoing Lumbar Puncture using the typical kit containing large 20 gauge needles (1). Hypothesis is that Cosyntropin therapy is at least as effective as current conservative therapy (caffeine/fluid) and/or Epidural Blood Patch. Patients will be randomly assigned to undergo either: (1) EBP with IVF therapy or (2)Cosyntropin IV with IVF therapy. Endpoints will be a pain score that is given prior to the procedure, Emergency Department (ED) discharge pain score and post procedural day (PPD) day 1, day 3 and day 7 pain and functional levels. Patients in Cosyntropin arm of the study may request crossover to EBP at anytime after a 24 hour assessment period is completed per Standard of Care for treatment of PDPH, in order to ensure no undue distress is placed on the patient in order to complete this study. Current treatments consist primarily of non-invasive treatment with intravenous fluids and caffeine therapy and invasive treatment by Epidural Blood Patch. Efficacy of Caffeine 300mg IV bis in die (BID) x 1d doses is approximately 70% (2). However this therapy has been linked to post-treatment seizures. EBP was originally thought to be 90% effective with repeat treatment efficacy approaching \>96%. However more recent studies by Taivainen et al (3) have shown only a 61% rate of permanent cure. Additionally, EBP are contraindicated in patients with signs of increased intra-cranial pressure (ICP), coagulation issues, signs/symptoms of Central Nervous System (CNS) /systemic infection or local infection at the site of the EBP, thus resulting in decreased utility. Complications are also quite serious ranging from meningitis, spinal hematoma, repeat dural puncture, localized infection and vagal response to the procedure. EBP are not typically performed until after conservative measures have failed which leads to further prolongation of the patients decreased functional status and pain. Additionally, the cost of both treatments is substantial considering prolonged ED visits for conservative treatments often followed by the time and expense of an EBP. The goal of this investigation is to aid in the confirmation of case reports advocating the economy, efficacy and safety of synthetic Adrenal CorticTropin Hormone (ACTH) as a treatment of PDPH (4,5,6,7,8,9).

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
29

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2010

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2010

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2014

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 18, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 20, 2015

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

November 1, 2016

Status Verified

September 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

3.7 years

First QC Date

February 18, 2015

Results QC Date

September 12, 2016

Last Update Submit

September 12, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Postdural puncture headacheEpidural Blood PatchCosyntropinPDPHRegional anesthesiaLumbar punctureACTHTetracosactin

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Headache Pain Score

    Numerical 0-10 (0 no pain, 10 worst pain)

    1 day post procedure

  • Headache Pain Score

    Numerical 0-10 (0 no pain, 10 worst pain)

    3 days post procedure

  • Headache Pain Score

    Numerical 0-10 (0 no pain, 10 worst pain)

    7 days post procedure

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Functioning Score

    1 day post procedure

  • Functioning Score

    3 day post procedure

  • Functioning Score

    7 day post procedure

Study Arms (2)

Intravenous Cosyntropin Group A

EXPERIMENTAL

Cosyntropin 500 mcg in 1000cc Normal Saline

Drug: Cosyntropin

Epidural Blood Patch Group B

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Epidural Blood Patch and I000cc Normal Saline

Procedure: Epidural Blood Patch

Interventions

Intravenous Drug Infusion over 1 hour and a half

Also known as: Tetracosactin
Intravenous Cosyntropin Group A

Blood drawn from subject and then same Blood placed into Epidural space by anesthesia personnel.

Also known as: Blood patch
Epidural Blood Patch Group B

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years of age or older,
  • Diagnosed by Anesthesia provider as having PDPH
  • Agrees to participation in study

You may not qualify if:

  • In-patient status and/or unstable medical condition
  • Patient's contraindication to EBP: Local infection at injection site, systemic infection, hemodynamically unstable, severely hypovolemic
  • Patient's contraindication to EBP: Known or past reaction to natural ACTH or Cosyntropin
  • Signs or symptoms of ICP such as Mental Status changes, Bradycardia and hypertension
  • Congestive Heart Failure
  • Patient refusal to participate
  • Current Pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (7)

  • VANDAM LD, DRIPPS RD. Long-term follow-up of patients who received 10,098 spinal anesthetics; syndrome of decreased intracranial pressure (headache and ocular and auditory difficulties). J Am Med Assoc. 1956 Jun 16;161(7):586-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.1956.02970070018005. No abstract available.

    PMID: 13318967BACKGROUND
  • Sechzer PH, Abel L. Post-spinal anesthesia headache treated with caffeine. Evaluation with demand method. Part I. Curr Therap Res 1978; 24:307-12.

    BACKGROUND
  • Taivainen T, Pitkanen M, Tuominen M, Rosenberg PH. Efficacy of epidural blood patch for postdural puncture headache. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1993 Oct;37(7):702-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1993.tb03793.x.

    PMID: 8249562BACKGROUND
  • Collier BB. Treatment for post dural puncture headache. Br J Anaesth. 1994 Mar;72(3):366-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/72.3.366-c. No abstract available.

    PMID: 8130064BACKGROUND
  • Foster P. ACTH treatment for post-lumbar puncture headache. Br J Anaesth. 1994 Sep;73(3):429. doi: 10.1093/bja/73.3.429-a. No abstract available.

    PMID: 7946882BACKGROUND
  • Carter BL, Pasupuleti R. Use of intravenous cosyntropin in the treatment of postdural puncture headache. Anesthesiology. 2000 Jan;92(1):272-4. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200001000-00043. No abstract available.

    PMID: 10638928BACKGROUND
  • Gupta S, Agrawal A. Postdural puncture headache and ACTH. J Clin Anesth. 1997 May;9(3):258. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(97)00042-1. No abstract available.

    PMID: 9172038BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Post-Dural Puncture Headache

Interventions

CosyntropinBlood Patch, Epidural

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Headache Disorders, SecondaryHeadache DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Adrenocorticotropic HormoneMelanocortinsPro-OpiomelanocortinHypothalamic HormonesPeptide HormonesHormonesHormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone AntagonistsPituitary Hormones, AnteriorPituitary HormonesNeuropeptidesPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsProteinsBiological TherapyTherapeuticsInjections, EpiduralInjections, SpinalInjectionsDrug Administration RoutesDrug Therapy

Limitations and Caveats

Subjects treated with cosyntropin could also receive EBP.Lack of description of patient activity level on follow up.Functional scoring tool not validated.Cost analysis \& system utilization not captured.Variations in clinical judgment.Lack of blinding

Results Point of Contact

Title
Steven Hanling, MD
Organization
Naval Medical Center San Diego

Study Officials

  • Steven Hanling, MD

    NavalMCSD Pain Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2015

First Posted

March 20, 2015

Study Start

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion

April 1, 2014

Study Completion

April 1, 2014

Last Updated

November 1, 2016

Results First Posted

November 1, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share