NCT03993028

Brief Summary

Assess the repeatability of the ProLung Test

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2015

Typical duration for all trials

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 20, 2015

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 25, 2015

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 21, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 21, 2018

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 20, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

June 20, 2019

Status Verified

June 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

November 25, 2015

Last Update Submit

June 18, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Quantify EPN Scanner variability in transcutaneous volume-averaged thoracic bio-conductance when measured twice on the same subjects by the same operator on a single same day using the same EPN Scanner

    The null hypothesis is that same-day variability has no effect on scan results (i.e. when scanned twice on the same day).

    1 day

  • Quantify day-to-day within-subject variability when the same operator uses the same EPN Scanner on the same subjects to measure transcutaneous volume-averaged thoracic bio-conductance on two different days within one week.

    The null hypothesis is that day-to-day variability has no effect on scan results (i.e. when scanned twice on separate days).

    1 week

  • Effects of BMI and Sex on transcutaneous volume-averaged thoracic bio-conductance

    The null hypothesis is that BMI has no effect on scan results. The null hypothesis is that sex has no effect on scan results.

    1 week

  • Number of participants with device-related adverse events from thoracic bio-conductance measurement.

    time to complete scan.

    1 day

Eligibility Criteria

Age35 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Healthy Volunteers

You may qualify if:

  • Age 35 to 70 years
  • Able to understand and fulfill all requirements of this protocol
  • Provide signed informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Pacemaker or other implanted medical device
  • Current life-threatening medical condition
  • Current or recent use of systemic corticosteroids
  • Pregnant or lactating
  • Unusually strenuous exercise within previous 24 hours
  • Current abuse of alcohol or drugs
  • Medical or anatomical condition that precludes testing of all 62 measurement points
  • Other condition or reason at the discretion of the Principal Investigator or medical monitor

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2015

First Posted

June 20, 2019

Study Start

November 20, 2015

Primary Completion

November 21, 2018

Study Completion

November 21, 2018

Last Updated

June 20, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-06