NCT03990766

Brief Summary

This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of nasal theophylline irrigation in treating smell loss related to a viral respiratory infection. Half the participants will undergo nasal theophylline irrigation treatment while the other half will undergo placebo nasal irrigation with saline alone. All participants will have their sense of smell tested before and after 6 weeks of treatment. All participants will also be regularly asked about any potential side effects related to treatment. In addition, the first 10 participants will have their blood drawn to measure their theophylline level after 1 week of starting treatment to ensure it is not abnormally elevated.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
27

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 15, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 17, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 19, 2019

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 15, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 15, 2021

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 31, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

March 31, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

June 17, 2019

Results QC Date

January 19, 2022

Last Update Submit

March 7, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Olfactory dysfunctionAnosmiaHyposmiaPost-viralTheophyllineAdverse effectsSmell

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Patients With Improvement in Global Rating of Smell Change

    Self-reported change in smell after intervention on a 7-point Likert scale. Response options with corresponding point values: 7) Much better, 6) Somewhat better, 5) Slightly better, 4) Neither better nor worse, 3) Slightly worse, 2) Somewhat worse, and 1) Much worse. The maximum score is 7, and higher values indicate better outcomes. A score of 4 is considered neutral. Scores of 5 or higher indicated clinical improvement.

    6 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) Total Score Change

    6 weeks

  • Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders-Negative Statements (QOD-NS) Score Change

    6 weeks

  • Olfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Ratings (ODOR) Score Change

    6 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Theophylline saline irrigation

EXPERIMENTAL

Theophylline 12 mg capsule contents dissolved into a sinus rinse bottle containing distilled or boiled tap water and USP Grade Sodium Chloride \& Sodium Bicarbonate Mixture commercially prepared packets, delivered to the bilateral nasal cavities twice daily.

Drug: Theophylline

Placebo saline irrigation

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Identical-appearing lactose monohydrate capsule contents dissolved into a sinus rinse bottle containing distilled or boiled tap water and USP Grade Sodium Chloride \& Sodium Bicarbonate Mixture commercially prepared packets, delivered to the bilateral nasal cavities twice daily.

Drug: Saline Nasal

Interventions

Theophylline delivered via high-volume, low-pressure nasal saline irrigation

Theophylline saline irrigation

Lactose delivered via high-volume, low-pressure nasal saline irrigation

Placebo saline irrigation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjective or clinically diagnosed olfactory dysfunction of 6 months to 36 months duration after a presumed viral upper respiratory infection
  • Ability to read, write, and understand English

You may not qualify if:

  • Dependence on theophylline for comorbid conditions such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • History of an allergic reaction to theophylline or other methylxanthines
  • Prior sinonasal or anterior skull base surgery
  • Nasal polyposis
  • History of neurodegenerative disease (ie. Alzheimer's dementia, Parkinson's disease, Lewy body dementia, frontotemporal dementia)
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding mothers
  • Current use of medications with significant (≥40%) interactions with theophylline, which include cimetidine, ciprofloxacin, disulfiram, enoxacin, fluvoxamine, interferon-alpha, lithium, mexiletine, phenytoin, propafenone, propranolol, tacrine, thiabendazole, ticlopidine, and troleandomycin

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Washington University in St. Louis

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

AnosmiaVirus DiseasesOlfaction Disorders

Interventions

TheophyllineSodium Chloride

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Sensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsInfections

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

XanthinesAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsPurinonesPurinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingChloridesHydrochloric AcidChlorine CompoundsInorganic ChemicalsSodium Compounds

Limitations and Caveats

The diagnosis of PVOD is by patient history and is thus subject to recall bias. In addition, PVOD treatment response may differ according to the causative virus, which is rarely known. The sample size was limited since all non-life saving clinical research and recruitment were halted at our institution at the time due to COVID-19. Lastly, the optimal dosing of theophylline irrigations is yet to be determined.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Jake Lee
Organization
Washington University School of Medicine

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Double-blinded
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Two randomized arms
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2019

First Posted

June 19, 2019

Study Start

May 15, 2019

Primary Completion

January 15, 2021

Study Completion

January 15, 2021

Last Updated

March 31, 2022

Results First Posted

March 31, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-03

Locations