Smell Changes & Efficacy of Nasal Theophylline
SCENT
SCENT Trial: Nasal Theophylline Irrigation for Treatment of Post-Viral Olfactory Dysfunction
1 other identifier
interventional
27
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of nasal theophylline irrigation in treating smell loss related to a viral respiratory infection. Half the participants will undergo nasal theophylline irrigation treatment while the other half will undergo placebo nasal irrigation with saline alone. All participants will have their sense of smell tested before and after 6 weeks of treatment. All participants will also be regularly asked about any potential side effects related to treatment. In addition, the first 10 participants will have their blood drawn to measure their theophylline level after 1 week of starting treatment to ensure it is not abnormally elevated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started May 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 17, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 19, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 15, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 31, 2022
CompletedMarch 31, 2022
March 1, 2022
1.7 years
June 17, 2019
January 19, 2022
March 7, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Patients With Improvement in Global Rating of Smell Change
Self-reported change in smell after intervention on a 7-point Likert scale. Response options with corresponding point values: 7) Much better, 6) Somewhat better, 5) Slightly better, 4) Neither better nor worse, 3) Slightly worse, 2) Somewhat worse, and 1) Much worse. The maximum score is 7, and higher values indicate better outcomes. A score of 4 is considered neutral. Scores of 5 or higher indicated clinical improvement.
6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) Total Score Change
6 weeks
Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders-Negative Statements (QOD-NS) Score Change
6 weeks
Olfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Ratings (ODOR) Score Change
6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Theophylline saline irrigation
EXPERIMENTALTheophylline 12 mg capsule contents dissolved into a sinus rinse bottle containing distilled or boiled tap water and USP Grade Sodium Chloride \& Sodium Bicarbonate Mixture commercially prepared packets, delivered to the bilateral nasal cavities twice daily.
Placebo saline irrigation
PLACEBO COMPARATORIdentical-appearing lactose monohydrate capsule contents dissolved into a sinus rinse bottle containing distilled or boiled tap water and USP Grade Sodium Chloride \& Sodium Bicarbonate Mixture commercially prepared packets, delivered to the bilateral nasal cavities twice daily.
Interventions
Theophylline delivered via high-volume, low-pressure nasal saline irrigation
Lactose delivered via high-volume, low-pressure nasal saline irrigation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjective or clinically diagnosed olfactory dysfunction of 6 months to 36 months duration after a presumed viral upper respiratory infection
- Ability to read, write, and understand English
You may not qualify if:
- Dependence on theophylline for comorbid conditions such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- History of an allergic reaction to theophylline or other methylxanthines
- Prior sinonasal or anterior skull base surgery
- Nasal polyposis
- History of neurodegenerative disease (ie. Alzheimer's dementia, Parkinson's disease, Lewy body dementia, frontotemporal dementia)
- Pregnant or breastfeeding mothers
- Current use of medications with significant (≥40%) interactions with theophylline, which include cimetidine, ciprofloxacin, disulfiram, enoxacin, fluvoxamine, interferon-alpha, lithium, mexiletine, phenytoin, propafenone, propranolol, tacrine, thiabendazole, ticlopidine, and troleandomycin
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Washington University in St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The diagnosis of PVOD is by patient history and is thus subject to recall bias. In addition, PVOD treatment response may differ according to the causative virus, which is rarely known. The sample size was limited since all non-life saving clinical research and recruitment were halted at our institution at the time due to COVID-19. Lastly, the optimal dosing of theophylline irrigations is yet to be determined.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Jake Lee
- Organization
- Washington University School of Medicine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Double-blinded
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 17, 2019
First Posted
June 19, 2019
Study Start
May 15, 2019
Primary Completion
January 15, 2021
Study Completion
January 15, 2021
Last Updated
March 31, 2022
Results First Posted
March 31, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03