Study of TAK-935 as an Adjunctive Therapy in Adult Participants With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)
A Phase 2a, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of TAK-935 as an Adjunctive Therapy in Adult Subjects With Chronic Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of soticlestat (TAK-935) on calculated 24-hour average pain intensity by the numeric pain scale (NPS).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Jul 2019
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 17, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 19, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 23, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 29, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 28, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 15, 2021
CompletedJuly 15, 2021
June 1, 2021
11 months
June 17, 2019
June 24, 2021
June 24, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in Mean 24-Hour Pain Intensity as Assessed by NPS Score to the End of Part A
The 24-hour average pain intensity was calculated from current pain intensity scores collected three times a day as measured by the electronic pain diary daily using NPS. NPS is an 11-point scale, where scores range from 0-10, 0= no pain to 10 = most pain imaginable. Negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Baseline and Week 15
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Percent Change From Baseline in Mean 24-Hour Pain Intensity as Assessed by NPS Score to the End of Part A
Baseline and Week 15
Percentage of Participants Considered Responders at the End of Part A
Week 15
Change From Baseline in Domain Score of PROMIS-29 Version 2.1 at the End of Part A
Baseline and Week 15
Percent Change From Baseline in Domain Score of PROMIS-29 Version 2.1 at the End of Part A
Baseline and Week 15
Percentage of Participants in Each Category of the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale at the End of Part A
Week 15
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORSoticlestat matching placebo tablets, orally, twice daily (BID) for Weeks 1, 2 and 3 in Double blind Titration Period. Soticlestat matching placebo tablets, orally BID for 12 weeks in Double blind Maintenance Period. Taper period (if participant did not continue to Part B): Dose of soticlestat matching placebo tablets was reduced to next lower dose every 3 days (maximum 6 days) until discontinuation.
Double-Blind Treatment Period - Part A: Soticlestat
EXPERIMENTALSoticlestat, tablet, orally, 100 mg BID for Week 1, followed by 2×100 mg tablets, soticlestat, orally BID for Week 2, further followed by 3×100 mg tablets, soticlestat, orally BID for Week 3. Dose was uptitrated every week based on safety and tolerability. Part A (Double blind Maintenance Period): 3×100 mg tablets, soticlestat, orally BID for 12 weeks. Dose was adjusted during Maintenance Period due to safety and tolerability. Taper Period (if participant did not continue to Part B): Dose of soticlestat was reduced to next lower dose every 3 days (maximum 6 days) until soticlestat was discontinued.
Open-Label Extension Period - Part B: Soticlestat
EXPERIMENTALSoticlestat, 2×100 mg tablets, orally, BID for Week 1, followed by 3×100 mg tablets, soticlestat, orally, BID for Week 2. Dose was uptitrated every week based on safety and tolerability. Part B (Open label extension: Maintenance Period): 3×100 mg tablets, soticlestat, orally, BID for 12 weeks. Dose was adjusted during Maintenance Period due to safety and tolerability. Taper Period: Dose of soticlestat was reduced to next lower dose every 3 days (maximum 6 days) until soticlestat was discontinued.
Interventions
Soticlestat tablets
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participant meets the Budapest clinical diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) at the screening visit and is at least 6 months since onset of symptoms.
- Participant's pain medications and nondrug treatments must be stable (regimented per prescription) for 1 month prior to screening and remain stable throughout Part A.
- Participant agrees to use a single previously prescribed rescue medication within the prescribed dose during Part A of the study and to record the daily use of these medications.
- Participant must have an average 24-hour pain intensity score ≥4 and ≤9 on the 24-hour average pain intensity numeric pain scale (NPS) during screening/baseline. This score will be calculated by averaging the daily 24 hour pain intensity scores for the past seven days prior to randomization. The participant must have daily 24-hour pain intensity scores recorded for at least 6 of the past 7 days.
You may not qualify if:
- Currently receiving intravenous (IV) or oral ketamine, history of IV or oral ketamine use within the past 6 weeks prior to screening, or planned use of IV or oral ketamine during this study.
- Participant is receiving chronic opioid treatment at a dose that has not been stable 28 days prior to screening.
- Participant is receiving chronic opioid treatment \>160 mg of morphine equivalent per day.
- Participant has a positive drug screen for phencyclidine, amphetamine/ methamphetamine, or cocaine at screening. Cannabis is allowed..
- Participant is positive for hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection at screening. (Note that participants who have been vaccinated against hepatitis B \[hepatitis B surface antibody {Ab}-positive\] who are negative for other markers of prior hepatitis B infection \[eg, negative for hepatitis B core Ab\] are eligible. Also, note that participants who are positive for hepatitis C Ab are eligible if they have a negative hepatitis C viral load by quantitative polymerase chain reaction).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
St Pancras Clinical Research
London, England, WC1X 8QD, United Kingdom
Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Preston, England, PR2 9HT, United Kingdom
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Southampton, England, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Ratcliffe S, Arkilo D, Asgharnejad M, Bhattacharya S, Harden RN. Randomized controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of soticlestat as adjunctive therapy in adults with complex regional pain syndrome. Pain Med. 2023 Jul 5;24(7):872-880. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnac198.
PMID: 36538782DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Takeda
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Study Director
Takeda
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 17, 2019
First Posted
June 19, 2019
Study Start
July 23, 2019
Primary Completion
June 29, 2020
Study Completion
October 28, 2020
Last Updated
July 15, 2021
Results First Posted
July 15, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Access Criteria
- IPD from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described on https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/. For approved requests, the researchers will be provided access to anonymized data (to respect patient privacy in line with applicable laws and regulations) and with information necessary to address the research objectives under the terms of a data sharing agreement.
Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.