Perianal Fistula (PAF) Validation and Burden of Illness Study
Perianal Fistula Procedure Validation, Matched Case Control, and Patient Journey Study
2 other identifiers
observational
3,032
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to gain a better understanding of the disease burden and unmet need of perianal fistulas within Crohn's disease (CD) in Ontario.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jul 2019
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 7, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 11, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 2, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 17, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 21, 2021
CompletedApril 21, 2021
March 1, 2021
6 months
June 7, 2019
December 11, 2020
March 26, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Objective 1: Number of CD Participants Who Have CPAF Using Various Codes in an TOH Database
Index date first time participant meets case definition(diagnosis of CD with CPAF in index period).Participants divided as:2 diagnosis/imaging codes(IC),2 codes must be in 2 year(yr) period of each other;3 diagnosis/IC/intervention code/EUA+seton;3 diagnosis/IC/intervention code/EUA+seton,diagnosis/IC requirements are satisfied,codes must be in 2yr period of each other;2 diagnosis/IC;3 diagnosis/IC,3 codes must be in 2yr period of each other;3 diagnosis/IC;diagnosis/IC+(EUA+Seton);diagnosis/IC+(EUA+Seton),2 codes must be in 2yr period of each other;3 diagnosis /IC+intervention code 4 codes must be in 2 yr period of each other;2 IC/intervention code/diagnosis code/EUA+seton;2 IC/intervention code/diagnosis code/EUA+seton,IC requirements are satisfied, codes must be in 2yr period of each other;2 diagnosis/IC+intervention code;3 diagnosis/IC+intervention code;2 diagnosis/IC+intervention code,3 codes must be in 2yr period of each other;diagnosis/imaging/intervention codes;diagnosis/IC.
From the date of CD diagnosis up to the index date (approximately 5 years)
Objective 2: Mean Costs for Crohn's Disease Participants With and Without CPAF in ICES Database CPAF
Impact of total disease burden on participants CD with and without CPAF was measured as total cost and cost by sector which included general physicians (GP), specialist, all physician OHIP, home care services, hospital admissions, dialysis, cancer, and radiation, emergency department (ED), Ontario drug benefit (ODB), hospital outpatient clinics, same day surgery (SDS). Index date was defined as the date the first time the participant meets the case definition i.e. diagnosis of CD with CPAF in the index period.
From the index date up to end of study (approximately 5 years post-index)
Objective 2: Number of Visits for Healthcare Resource Utilization for Crohn's Disease Participants With and Without CPAF in ICES Database
Healthcare Resource Utilization was based on three procedures which included the number of ED visits, number of hospitalizations and number of outpatient visits. Index date was defined as the date the first time the participant meets the case definition i.e. diagnosis of CD with CPAF in the index period.
From the index date up to end of study (approximately 5 years post-index)
Objective 3: Mean Costs Based on Three Procedures for Crohn's Disease Participants With CPAF by Sector in ICES Database
Impact of total disease burden on participants CD with CPAF was based on three procedures which included total cost, total cost (without ODB) and cost by sector i.e. general physicians (GP), specialist, all physician OHIP, home care services, hospital admissions, Dialysis, Cancer, and Radiation, non-hospital based residential care, emergency department (ED), Ontario drug benefit (ODB), hospital outpatient clinics, same day surgery (SDS). Index date was defined as the date the first time the participant meets the case definition i.e. diagnosis of CD with CPAF in the index period. Participants with CD and CPAF were categorized into pre-defined treatment pathways and results are reported in three arms: No Intervention, EUA ± Seton and Advanced Intervention.
From the index date up to 5 years post-index
Objective 3: Number of Visits for Healthcare Resource Utilization Based on Three Procedures for Crohn's Disease Participants With CPAF
Healthcare Resource Utilization was based on three procedures which included the number of ED visits, number of hospitalizations and number of outpatient visits. Index date was defined as the date the first time the participant meets the case definition i.e. diagnosis of CD with CPAF in the index period. Participants with CD and CPAF were categorized into pre-defined treatment pathways and results are reported in three arms: No Intervention, EUA ± Seton and Advanced Intervention.
From the index date up to 5 years post-index
Study Arms (3)
CD Participants with CPAF - The Ottawa Hospital (TOH)
Participants diagnosed with Complex Perianal Fistula (CPAF) from the Ottawa Hospital (TOH) were observed retrospectively in this arm group for the index period (April 1, 2007 to March 31, 2013).
CD Participants without CPAF (ICES database)
Participants diagnosed with CD and without CPAF from Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) database who did not meet the case definition were observed retrospectively in this arm group for the index period (April 1, 2007 to March 31, 2013).
CD Participants with CPAF (ICES database)
Participants with CD and CPAF from ICES database who met the case definition were observed retrospectively in this arm group for the index period (April 1, 2007 to March 31, 2013).
Interventions
This is an observational study, participants did not receive any intervention in this study and were only observed retrospectively.
Eligibility Criteria
Participants diagnosed with CD with and without CPAF will be observed retrospectively in this study.
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18-105 inclusive at date of index.
- Participant can be linked between TOH "reference" database to the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) databases based on health card number.
- Incident diagnosis of CPAF in TOH database between April 1, 2004 to July 1, 2015.
- Participants were incident in the OCCC from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2012.
- The case meets the PAF case definition identified in Objective 1 in the selection period (April 1, 2005 to March 31, 2012).
- Aged 18-105 inclusive at date of index.
- The case meets the CPAF case definition identified in Objective 1 in the selection period.
- Have to have 5 years of follow-up.
- Aged 18-105 inclusive at date of index.
You may not qualify if:
- Missing demographics at index date (sex, age, Local Health Integration Network (LHIN), income quintile) in all databases.
- Death date in the ICES data prior to TOH CPAF incidence date.
- Missing demographics at index date (sex, age, neighbourhood income quintile, LHIN).
- Death during 5-year analysis period.
- Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) coverage is terminated during the follow-up example if the participant moves to another province.
- Meeting the case definition during the lookback period.
- Cases for whom a matched control cannot be found.
- Missing demographics at index date (sex, age, neighbourhood income quintile, LHIN).
- Death during 5-year analysis period.
- OHIP coverage is terminated during the 5-year analysis period example if the participant moves to another province.
- Meeting the case definition during the lookback period.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Takedalead
Study Sites (1)
Takeda Canada
Oakville, Ontario, L6H 0J8, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Director
- Organization
- Takeda
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical director
Takeda
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 7, 2019
First Posted
June 11, 2019
Study Start
July 2, 2019
Primary Completion
December 17, 2019
Study Completion
December 31, 2019
Last Updated
April 21, 2021
Results First Posted
April 21, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Access Criteria
- IPD from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described on https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/. For approved requests, the researchers will be provided access to anonymized data (to respect patient privacy in line with applicable laws and regulations) and with information necessary to address the research objectives under the terms of a data sharing agreement.
Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.