Non-interventional Study of Moderate to Severe Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Brazil
Real-world Data of Moderate to Severe Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Brazil: a Non-interventional, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Disease Control, Treatment Patterns, Burden of Disease and Quality of Life (RISE BR)
2 other identifiers
observational
407
1 country
13
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to gather information regarding the population with moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the burden of the disease, and understand their treatment patterns, particularly on the use of available biologic therapies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2016
13 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 30, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 4, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 11, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 5, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 19, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 25, 2020
CompletedFebruary 25, 2020
February 1, 2020
1.3 years
June 30, 2016
October 1, 2019
February 11, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Percentage of Participants With Active Crohn's Disease (CD) at Day 1
Participants with Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) score of ≥8 or Crohn´s Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≥220 points at Day 1 were classified as participants with active disease. HBI scale assessed five dimensions (general well-being, abdominal pain, number of liquid stools per day, abdominal mass, and complications). These dimensions were scored from the previous day. The total score ranges from 0 to 25. The CDAI evaluated the severity of signs and symptoms of CD. Collected data included information on the number of liquid stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, presence of comorbid conditions, use of medications for diarrhea, physical examination, and laboratory findings (abdominal mass, hematocrit, body weight), yielding 8 items that were combined with data from a 7-day diary to obtain the total CDAI score which ranges from 0 to approximately 600 points, where higher score indicates higher disease activity.
Day 1
Number of Participants With Active Ulcerative Colitis (UC) at Day 1
Participants with ≥5 points in Partial Mayo Score were classified as active UC disease. The mayo score without endoscopy measured severity of ulcerative colitis. Three sub-scores for stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and physician's global assessment were each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Individual sub-scores were then summed to provide the total score ranging from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease).
Day 1
Secondary Outcomes (25)
Number of Participants With Moderate to Severe CD or UC Stratified by Age, Gender, Professional Status, Family History, Educational Level and Income at Day 1
Day 1
Number of Participants With Moderate to Severe CD or UC Stratified by Clinical Variables
Day 1
Percentage of Participants With Moderate to Severe CD or UC Who Used Various Types of Therapies for IBD in Previous 3 Years
Within the previous 3 years including Day 1
Percentage of Participants With Moderate to Severe CD or UC Treated With Biologic Therapy Within 3 Previous Years
Within the previous 3 years including Day 1
Percentage of Participants With Moderate to Severe CD or UC Who Have Not Responded Previously to Biologic Therapies
Day 1
- +20 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Crohn's Disease
Participants with diagnosis of moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD) for at least 6 months prior to Day 1 were observed to collect the retrospective data including previous inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatments (drug dose, treatment duration, drug changes), and use of other health resources related with the management of IBD for previous three years at Day 1. Participants with active IBD and CD at Day 1 were followed up for 12 months in prospective phase.
Ulcerative Colitis
Participants diagnosed with diagnosis of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) for at least 6 months prior to Day 1 were observed to collect the retrospective data including previous inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatments (drug dose, treatment duration, drug changes), and use of other health resources related with the management of IBD for previous three years at Day 1. Participants with active IBD and UC at Day 1 were followed up for 12 months in prospective phase.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Adult participants diagnosed with moderate to severe Crohn's Disease (CD) or Ulcerative Colitis (UC) were observed.
You may qualify if:
- Male or female.
- years or older (at the time of diagnosis of moderate to severe UC or CD).
- Diagnosis of moderate to severe CD or UC for at least 6 months prior to Day 1 appointment according the clinical or endoscopic \\ criteria.
- Has provided the written informed consent. For the prospective period, eligible participants should present at least one of the following criteria that will only be applied at Day 1:
- For CD participants:
- Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) ≥8 or
- Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≥220 or Considering that for CD participants, the disease activity may not be clearly documented only with clinical data, some objective criteria may be considered as entry criteria for the 12-month prospective period:
- Colonoscopy in the previous year suggestive of inadequate control of activity or,
- Calprotectin levels in the previous year suggestive of inadequate control of activity (i.e, calprotectin \>200 µg/g).
- For UC: partial Mayo Score ≥5.
- Note: Participants with colostomy and prospective period: Although clinical scales defined above are impacted by colostomy these participants will not be excluded from the protocol to ensure the assessment of different clinical presentations of the IBD. In addition, participants with colostomy must follow the same criteria as above to be eligible to the prospective phase.
You may not qualify if:
- Indeterminate or not classified colitis.
- Current or previous participation in interventional clinical trial (within the last 3 years). In addition, for the 12-month prospective period, participants will be excluded if:
- Presenting mental incapacity, unwillingness or language barriers precluding adequate understanding or cooperation.
- Hospitalized participants at Day 1.
- Current off label treatment with Vedolizumab.
- Study Discontinuation Criteria It will be considered a premature termination the situation in which the participant discontinues the participation, i.e. they are withdrawn from the study before completing the 12 months of follow up period (365 days ± 14 days from Day 1), due to any of the reasons listed below:
- Withdrawal of consent: participants who for any reason withdraw the free and informed consent;
- Lost to follow-up (no return of the participant on the expected date of visit - drop-out from the protocol);
- Death;
- Study termination;
- Note: Participants who are eligible for the prospective period, it means, with active disease at Day 1 but who during the 12 months period presents disease remission and/or no activity disease condition, are allowed to continue the participation in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Takedalead
Study Sites (13)
Unknown Facility
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Teresina, Piauí, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Santo André, São Paulo, Brazil
Unknown Facility
São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Unknown Facility
São Paulo, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Missing data on paticipants medical records in retrospective analysis and missing information in medical activity scores of participants in prospective analysis resulted in improper collection of data for IBD participants.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Director
- Organization
- Takeda
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Abner Augusto Lobão Neto Clinical Science
Takeda
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 30, 2016
First Posted
July 4, 2016
Study Start
October 11, 2016
Primary Completion
February 5, 2018
Study Completion
February 19, 2018
Last Updated
February 25, 2020
Results First Posted
February 25, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Takeda makes patient-level, de-identified data sets and associated documents available for all interventional studies after applicable marketing approvals and commercial availability have been received (or program is completely terminated), an opportunity for the primary publication of the research and final report development has been allowed, and other criteria have been met as set forth in Takeda's Data Sharing Policy (see www.TakedaClinicalTrials.com for details). To obtain access, researchers must submit a legitimate academic research proposal for adjudication by an independent review panel, who will review the scientific merit of the research and the requestor's qualifications and conflict of interest that can result in potential bias. Once approved, qualified researchers who sign a data sharing agreement are provided access to these data in a secure research environment.