Effectiveness Basket Wires for the Maintenance of Stone and Pneumatic Probe in the Treatment of Ureteral Stones
Determine the Effectiveness of Convective Uses of Basket Wires for the Maintenance of Stone and Pneumatic Probe in the Treatment of Ureteral Stones
1 other identifier
interventional
124
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Patients included in the study included the necessary tests U / A, K, Na, Cr, BUN, CBC, And U / C was checked and anesthesia counseling was done. Patients were prepared for action. The demographic and clinical data of the patients, including age, sex, size, and location of the stones were recorded. Then patients as random allocation were divided into two groups: A (control group, no basket of bases and group B (use of pneumatic synchronous buccal waist). The dividing person and the patients themselves were not aware of which group they were in. They were double-blind was. In each group, ureteroscopy was performed using a standard F9.5 ureteroscope. After reaching the rock in group A (control), the probe of the pneumatic crusher was passed through the working channel of the ureteroscope and began crushing the rock. During the crushing process, the minimum flow of water, flattening and the single-shot impact was used to minimize the stone's retropulsion. In group B (using a basket of wires3F) the helical type was passed through the four wires of the working channel of the ureteroscope and routed to the proximal part of the rock, and the stone was routed to the bowl, then the stone was ducted The gasket was kept, and the probe of the pneumatic crusher also passed through the working channel and proceeded to break it down. Conditions were observed during the stomach as the control group. Ureteroscopic crushing was performed by a urologist in both groups under similar technical conditions. Findings during and after the completion of crushing include the success, stone retropulsion or parts larger than 3 mm, which requires secondary measures (SWL - ureter stenting, resection ureteroscopy), the duration of stone breakdown and traumatic ureteric complications in both groups it is registered.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 29, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 18, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 4, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 10, 2019
CompletedJune 10, 2019
June 1, 2019
1.7 years
June 4, 2019
June 6, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Stone size
The largest diameter of the stone in the imaging of millimeters
24 hours
Crushing time
Duration needed to break the stone to the minute
up to 23minute
Demographic questionnaire
The demographic questionnaire was used to collect information
24 hours
Troma in the ureter area
Follow up of patients for perforation, missing stone, and ureter ligation according to observations during and after surgery
up to 24 hours
Study Arms (2)
control group, no basket of wire
EXPERIMENTALThe dividing person and the patients themselves were not aware of which group they were in. They were double-blind Was. In each group, ureteroscopy was performed using a standard F9.5 ureteroscope. After reaching the rock in group A (control), the probe of the pneumatic crusher was passed through the working channel of the ureteroscope and began crushing the rock. During the crushing process, the minimum flow of water, flattening and the single-shot impact was used to minimize the stone's retropulsion.
using a basket of wires
SHAM COMPARATORIn group B (using a basket of wires3F) the helical type was passed through the four wires of the working channel of the orthoscope and routed to the proximal part of the rock, and the stone was routed to the bowl, then the stone was ducted The gasket was kept, and the probe of the pneumatic crusher also passed through the working channel and proceeded to break it down. Conditions were observed during the stomach as control group. Urethroscopic crushing was performed by a urologist in both groups under similar technical conditions. Findings during and after the completion of crushing include the success, stone retropulsion or parts larger than 3 mm, which requires secondary measures (SWL - ureter stenting, resection ureteroscopy), the duration of stone breakdown and traumatic ureteric complications in both groups it is registered
Interventions
(using a basket of wires3F) the helical type was passed through the four wires of the working channel of the orthoscope and routed to the proximal part of the rock, and the stone was routed to the bowl, then the stone was ducted The gasket was kept, and the probe of the pneumatic crusher also passed through the working channel and proceeded to break it down. Conditions were observed during the stomach as control group. Urethroscopic crushing was performed by a urologist in both groups under similar technical conditions. Findings during and after the completion of crushing include the success, stone retropulsion or parts larger than 3 mm, which requires secondary measures (SWL - ureter stenting, resection ureteroscopy), the duration of stone breakdown and traumatic ureteric complications in both groups it is registered
In each group, ureteroscopy was performed using a standard F9.5 ureteroscope. After reaching the rock in group A (control), the probe of the pneumatic crusher was passed through the working channel of the ureteroscope and began crushing the rock. During the crushing process, the minimum flow of water, flattening and the single-shot impact was used to minimize the stone's retropulsion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individual interest in engaging in research
- Patients with ureter stones
- Symptoms of severe and resistant to supportive and therapeutic treatment
- Ureteral stones cause ureteral obstruction
- Ureteral stones, which is not likely to be disposed of by duration and size, have been selected for ureteroscopic lithotripsy.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with urinary tract infection
- Not having a proper cardiovascular condition and not approved by a cardiologist or anesthetist
- Patients who are dissatisfied with ureteroscopic crushing and patients who do not have access to rocks during ureteroscopic surgery
- Individual interest in leaving the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
MS Bagheri-baghdasht
Tehran, Iran
MS bagheri-baghdast
Tehran, Iran
Related Publications (7)
Elashry OM, Tawfik AM. Preventing stone retropulsion during intracorporeal lithotripsy. Nat Rev Urol. 2012 Dec;9(12):691-8. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2012.204. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
PMID: 23165399RESULTRane A, Bradoo A, Rao P, Shivde S, Elhilali M, Anidjar M, Pace K, D'A Honey JR. The use of a novel reverse thermosensitive polymer to prevent ureteral stone retropulsion during intracorporeal lithotripsy: a randomized, controlled trial. J Urol. 2010 Apr;183(4):1417-21. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.023. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
PMID: 20171695RESULTVejdani K, Eisner BH, Pengune W, Stoller ML. Effect of laser insult on devices used to prevent stone retropulsion during ureteroscopic lithotripsy. J Endourol. 2009 Feb;23(2):249-51. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0352.
PMID: 19220084RESULTUrsiny M, Eisner BH. Cost-effectiveness of anti-retropulsion devices for ureteroscopic lithotripsy. J Urol. 2013 May;189(5):1762-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.085. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
PMID: 23159589RESULTWu JA, Ngo TC, Hagedorn JC, Macleod LC, Chung BI, Shinghal R. The accordion antiretropulsive device improves stone-free rates during ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy. J Endourol. 2013 Apr;27(4):438-41. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0332. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
PMID: 23387558RESULTPagnani CJ, El Akkad M, Bagley DH. Prevention of stone migration with the Accordion during endoscopic ureteral lithotripsy. J Endourol. 2012 May;26(5):484-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0386. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
PMID: 22192096RESULTFarahat YA, Elbahnasy AE, Elashry OM. A randomized prospective controlled study for assessment of different ureteral occlusion devices in prevention of stone migration during pneumatic lithotripsy. Urology. 2011 Jan;77(1):30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.05.063. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
PMID: 20970173RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- patients as random allocation were divided into two groups: A (control group, no basket of bases and group B (use of pneumatic synchronous buccal waist). The dividing person and the patients themselves were not aware of which group they were in. They were double-blind Was.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- student research committee
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 4, 2019
First Posted
June 10, 2019
Study Start
April 29, 2015
Primary Completion
January 18, 2017
Study Completion
April 20, 2018
Last Updated
June 10, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share