Effect of SGLT2i in Conjunction With the Artificial Pancreas on Improving the Glycemia in T1DM in the Outpatient Setting
CLASS17
Effect of SGLT2 Inhibition on Improving the Glycemic Performance of the Single Hormone Artificial Pancreas Configuration in Type 1 Diabetes in the Outpatient Setting - A Randomized Placebo Controlled Cross-Over Multicentre Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The most advanced configurations of the Artificial Pancreas (AP) have not yet been demonstrated to sufficiently maximize time in target glycemia. One limitation is the challenge of postprandial glycemic control, which currently requires ongoing patient engagement for accurate and detailed bolus dose estimation for meals. Sodium Glucose Linked Transporter 2 Inhibition (SGLT2i) provides an additional mechanism to attenuate post-prandial glycemic excursion, and may represent a strategy that could further alleviate carbohydrate counting burden and improve the performance of AP configurations. This trial aims to compare - using a randomized, masked placebo-controlled, crossover, multicenter design - the efficacy of the SGLT2i empagliflozin 25 mg oral per day each in the setting of single-hormone automated AP and conventional insulin pump therapy on the proportion of time spent in target and in hypoglycemia each during a 4-week day-and-night period. The pilot trial aims to enroll 28 adult patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) across 2 research sites (one in Toronto and one in Montreal) and includes a 2- week therapy optimization run-in period, 4-weeks for each of the two AP intervention arms, and a 1- week washout in between the pharmacological intervention sequences. Glucose levels will be measured by continuous glucose monitoring (G5, Dexcom Inc.). Insulin will be infused using a subcutaneous infusion pump (t-slim, Tandem Diabetes Care) and communication between pumps and the algorithm will be implemented using Android Smartphone devices and Bluetooth technology communication.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Aug 2019
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 13, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 7, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2021
CompletedJune 7, 2022
November 1, 2019
2.1 years
April 13, 2019
June 3, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Percentage of time spent in sensor glucose target range defined as between 3.9 and 7.8 mmol/L compared between 4- weeks AP on empagliflozin and 4-weeks AP with placebo
Percentage of time spent in sensor glucose target range defined as between 3.9 and 7.8 mmol/L compared between 4- weeks AP on empagliflozin and 4-weeks AP with placebo.
20 weeks
Percentage of time spent in sensor glucose target range defined as between 3.9 and 7.8 mmol/L compared between 4- weeks conventional pump therapy on empagliflozin and 4- weeks conventional pump therapy with placebo
Percentage of time spent in sensor glucose target range defined as between 3.9 and 7.8 mmol/L compared between 4- weeks conventional pump therapy on empagliflozin and 4- weeks conventional pump therapy with placebo.
20 weeks
Percentage of time spent in sensor glucose target range defined as between 3.9 and 7.8 mmol/L on 4- weeks automated AP on empagliflozin when compared to 4-weeks conventional pump therapy on empagliflozin
Percentage of time spent in sensor glucose target range defined as between 3.9 and 7.8 mmol/L on 4- weeks automated AP on empagliflozin when compared to 4-weeks conventional pump therapy on empagliflozin.
20 weeks
Percentage of time spent in sensor glucose target range defined as between 3.9 and 7.8 mmol/L on 4- weeks automated AP on empagliflozin when compared to 4-weeks conventional pump therapy with placebo
Percentage of time spent in sensor glucose target range defined as between 3.9 and 7.8 mmol/L on 4- weeks automated AP on empagliflozin when compared to 4-weeks conventional pump therapy with placebo.
20 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Percentage of time spent in sensor glucose target range defined as between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L compared between 4- weeks conventional pump therapy on empagliflozin and 4-weeks AP on empagliflozin
20 weeks
Percentage of time spent in sensor glucose target range defined as between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L compared between 4- weeks AP on empagliflozin and 4- weeks AP with placebo
20 weeks
Hypoglycemia: Percentage of time with glucose <3.9 mmol/L applied to each of the primary and secondary outcome comparator groups
20 weeks
Percentage of time spent in hypoglycemia, euglycemia and hyperglycemia
20 weeks
Absolute number of hypoglycemia events I.
20 weeks
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Empagliflozin arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipant will be treated by empagliflozin for 8 weeks. During these 8 weeks he will use artificial pancreas to deliver the insulin for 4 weeks and conventional pump therapy for remaining 4 weeks, in a random order. After finishing the entire arm intervention participant will undergo 7 day of washout and enters the placebo arm. Participant and research staff is blinded to arm assignment.
Placebo arm
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipant will take placebo for 8 weeks. During these 8 weeks he will use artificial pancreas to deliver the insulin for 4 weeks and conventional pump therapy for remaining 4 weeks, in a random order. After finishing the entire arm intervention participant will undergo 7 day of washout and enters the empagliflozin arm. Participant and research staff is blinded to arm assignment.
Interventions
Insulin delivery via a closed loop single-hormone artificial pancreas system.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed and dated written informed consent by the date of Visit 1 in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and local legislation.
- Males and females ≥ 18 years of age.
- Clinical diagnosis of T1D for at least one year. The diagnosis of T1D is based on the investigator's clinical judgment; C peptide level and antibody determinations are not planned.
- Insulin pump therapy use for at least 3 months.
- HbA1c ≤ 10%.
- eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m² as calculated by the CKD-EPI formula.
- Women of child-bearing potential must be ready and able to use highly effective methods of birth control that result in a low failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly.
You may not qualify if:
- Clinically significant nephropathy, neuropathy or retinopathy as judged by the investigator.
- Recent (\< 6 months) acute macrovascular event e.g. acute coronary syndrome or cardiac surgery.
- Renal insufficiency (characterized at eGFR below 60 mmol/l at the beginning of the trial)
- History of pheochromocytoma or insulinoma
- Beta-blockers at high dose (interference with glucose management).
- Chronic acetaminophen treatment (can interfere with glucose sensor measurements).
- Warfarin chronic treatment if INR monitoring cannot be evaluated (can increase the risk of bleeding).
- Current use of other non-insulin adjunct anti-hyperglycemic drug or use within 30 days prior to screening.
- Use of loop diuretics (e.g. furosemide, due to possible interference with study drug mechanism of action).
- Ongoing or planned pregnancy or breastfeeding.
- Severe hypoglycemic episode within one month prior to Visit 1.
- Diabetic ketoacidosis in the last 3 months prior to Visit 1.
- Current use of glucocorticoid medication except low stable dose and inhaled steroids (can interfere with glucose sensor measurements).
- Known or suspected allergy to the trial products.
- Other serious medical illness likely to interfere with study participation or with the ability to complete the trial by the judgment of the investigator.
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Sinai Health System
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3L9, Canada
McGill University
Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2B4, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bruce Perkins, MD
Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 13, 2019
First Posted
June 7, 2019
Study Start
August 1, 2019
Primary Completion
August 31, 2021
Study Completion
August 31, 2021
Last Updated
June 7, 2022
Record last verified: 2019-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share