Study Investigating PK, PD, Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Biosimilar Denosumab (GP2411) in Patients With Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Integrated Phase I/III Study in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis to Compare the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of GP2411 (Proposed Biosimilar Denosumab) and Prolia® (EU-authorized)
2 other identifiers
interventional
527
6 countries
42
Brief Summary
This study was conducted to assess if there were any clinically meaningful differences in pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), efficacy, safety, or immunogenicity between GP2411 (proposed biosimilar denosumab) and EU-authorized Prolia® (denosumab).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Jul 2019
Typical duration for phase_3
42 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 3, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 2, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 22, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 22, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 8, 2023
CompletedMarch 8, 2023
February 1, 2023
2.8 years
June 3, 2019
February 7, 2023
February 7, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (LS-BMD) at Week 52 - Per-Protocol Set
Bone density measurements were performed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Lumbar spine scan included L1 through L4 vertebrae. All DXA scans were submitted to a central imaging vendor for analysis. A mixed effect model for repeated measurements (MMRM) was fitted to the changes from baseline in LS-BMD for all post-baseline time points up to Week 52. Values at Week 52 were estimated from the model and are presented in the table.
Baseline (screening), up to Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (LS-BMD) at Week 52 - TP1 Full Analysis Set
Bone density measurements were performed by DXA. Lumbar spine scan included L1 through L4 vertebrae. All DXA scans were submitted to a central imaging vendor for analysis. A MMRM was fitted to the changes from baseline in LS-BMD for all post-baseline time points up to Week 52. Missing values were assumed to be missing at random (MAR) using the MMRM model. Values at Week 52 were estimated from the model and are presented in the table.
Baseline (screening), up to Week 52
Area Under the Effect-time Curve (AUEC) of Percentage Change From Baseline in Serum CTX Concentrations After First Dose - Pharmacodynamic Analysis Set
Carboxy-terminal crosslinked telopeptides of type I collagen (CTX) is a bone resorption biomarker. Serum CTX concentration-time data were analyzed by non-compartmental methods. The AUEC of baseline corrected serum CTX concentrations (% change from baseline) was calculated using the linear trapezoidal method. Values below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) were imputed with the actual value for the LLOQ.
Baseline (pre-dose Day 1), up to Week 26
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Denosumab After First Dose
Serum denosumab concentration-time data were analyzed by non-compartmental methods. Missing denosumab serum concentrations or concentrations below the LLOQ were not imputed and handled as missing values, except for the pre-dose sample which were treated as zero.
Baseline (pre-dose Day 1), up to Week 26
Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUCinf) of Denosumab After First Dose
Serum denosumab concentration-time data were analyzed by non-compartmental methods. Missing denosumab serum concentrations or concentrations below the LLOQ were not imputed and handled as missing values, except for the pre-dose sample which were treated as zero. The linear-up log-down trapezoidal method was used for the AUCinf calculation.
Baseline (pre-dose Day 1), up to Week 26
Secondary Outcomes (25)
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (LS-BMD) at Week 26 - Treatment Period 1 (Per-Protocol Set)
Baseline (screening), Week 26
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (LS-BMD) at Week 26 - Treatment Period 1 (TP1 Full Analysis Set)
Baseline (screening), Week 26
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (LS-BMD) at Week 78 - Treatment Period 2 (TP2 Full Analysis Set)
Baseline (screening), Week 78
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (FN-BMD) at Week 26 and Week 52 - Treatment Period 1 (Per-Protocol Set)
Baseline (screening), Week 26 and Week 52
Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (FN-BMD) at Week 26 and Week 52 - Treatment Period 1 (TP1 Full Analysis Set)
Baseline (screening), Week 26 and Week 52
- +20 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
GP2411
EXPERIMENTAL60 mg /mL subcutaneous injection every 6 months
EU authorized Prolia
ACTIVE COMPARATOR60 mg /mL subcutaneous injection every 6 months
Interventions
60 mg /mL subcutaneous injection every 6 months
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Postmenopausal women, diagnosed with osteoporosis
- Aged ≥ 55 and ≤ 80 years at screening
- Body weight ≥ 50 kg and ≤ 90 kg at screening
- Absolute bone mineral density consistent with T-score ≤ -2.5 and ≥ -4.0 at the lumbar spine as measured by DXA
- At least two vertebrae in the L1-L4 region and at least one hip joint are evaluable by DXA
You may not qualify if:
- Previous exposure to denosumab (Prolia, Xgeva, or biosimilar denosumab)
- History and/or presence of one severe or more than two moderate vertebral fractures or hip fracture
- History and/or presence of bone metastases, bone disease or metabolic disease
- Ongoing use of any osteoporosis treatment or use of prohibited treatment
- Other bone active drugs
- History and/or current hypoparathyroidism or hyperparathyroidism, hypocalcemia or hypercalcemia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (42)
Sandoz Investigational Site
Peoria, Arizona, 85381, United States
Sandoz Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33135, United States
Sandoz Investigational Site
Wichita, Kansas, 67207, United States
Sandoz Investigational Site
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635, United States
Sandoz Investigational Site
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610, United States
Sandoz Investigational Site
Carrollton, Texas, 75010, United States
Sandoz Investigational Site
Plovdiv, 4001, Bulgaria
Sandoz Investigational Site
Plovdiv, 4002, Bulgaria
Sandoz Investigational Site
Sofia, 1431, Bulgaria
Sandoz Investigational Site
Sofia, 1505, Bulgaria
Sandoz Investigational Site
Sofia, 1680, Bulgaria
Sandoz Investigational Site
Sofia, 1784, Bulgaria
Sandoz Investigational Site
Ostrava, Czech Republic, 772 00, Czechia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Hradec Králové, CZE, 500 05, Czechia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Brno, 602 00, Czechia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Ostrava, 702 00, Czechia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Pardubice, 530 02, Czechia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Pilsen, 30460, Czechia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Prague, 128 50, Czechia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Prague, 14900, Czechia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Uherské Hradiště, 686 01, Czechia
Sandoz Investigational Site
Fujimi, Saitama, 354-0021, Japan
Sandoz Investigational Site
Chuoh-ku, Tokyo, 104-0031, Japan
Sandoz Investigational Site
Hachiōji, Tokyo, 192-0046, Japan
Sandoz Investigational Site
Kiyose, Tokyo, 204-0021, Japan
Sandoz Investigational Site
Shinagawa, Tokyo, 140-0014, Japan
Sandoz Investigational Site
Krakow, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, 30-510, Poland
Sandoz Investigational Site
Bialystok, 15-351, Poland
Sandoz Investigational Site
Bialystok, 15-461, Poland
Sandoz Investigational Site
Bydgoszcz, 85 168, Poland
Sandoz Investigational Site
Lodz, 90 242, Poland
Sandoz Investigational Site
Nadarzyn, 05-830, Poland
Sandoz Investigational Site
Torun, 87-100, Poland
Sandoz Investigational Site
Warsaw, 00-874, Poland
Sandoz Investigational Site
Warsaw, 02 118, Poland
Sandoz Investigational Site
Warsaw, 02 691, Poland
Sandoz Investigational Site
Santiago de Compostela, A Coruna, 15705, Spain
Sandoz Investigational Site
Sabadell, Barcelona, 08208, Spain
Sandoz Investigational Site
Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, 15706, Spain
Sandoz Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08041, Spain
Sandoz Investigational Site
Madrid, 28009, Spain
Sandoz Investigational Site
Seville, 41010, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- double blind
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 3, 2019
First Posted
June 4, 2019
Study Start
July 2, 2019
Primary Completion
April 22, 2022
Study Completion
April 22, 2022
Last Updated
March 8, 2023
Results First Posted
March 8, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.