Warm-up Efficiency by Body Warmer Versus Standard Procedure in Severely Traumatized Patients
THERMOTRAUMA
Evaluation of Warm-up Efficiency by Body Warmer Versus Standard Procedure in Severely Traumatized Patients During Pre-hospital Medical Management
2 other identifiers
interventional
134
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Study of adult patients with severe all-cause trauma having a body temperature less than 36°Celsius (C) that is managed by a Mobile Emergency Service team and oriented towards a Vital Emergency Room. Currently two devices are used to warm patients during their care at the scene of an accident: a survival blanket and heating in the emergency vehicle. Despite these two devices many patients arrive in hypothermia (body temperature less than 36°C) in emergency departments. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a body warmer associated with standard warming devices on the correction of hypothermia compared to the standard procedure in severely traumatized patients with hypothermia . It is a national multicentric study with 14 participating Mobile Emergency Service centers and hopefully will include 612 patients. The study will be carried out according to a pattern of 28 successive periods of one week each during the winter period (October to April), for a total duration of 7 months. 14 action periods ON (warming standard procedure + body warmer) and 14 control periods OFF (warming standard procedure) will be run in random order for each center.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 15, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 3, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 17, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 27, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 27, 2022
CompletedJune 3, 2022
May 1, 2022
2.5 years
May 15, 2019
May 31, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of patients with a temperature > 36°C when the patient arrived in the Vital Emergency
Body temperature will be measured in trans-tympanic when the patient arrived in the Vital Emergency Room.
4 hours
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Change in body temperature between initial treatment by the Mobile Emergency Service team and arrival at Vital Emergency Room.
4 hours
Proportion of patients with coagulopathy on arrival at the emergency room.
4 hours
Proportion of patients with acidosis on arrival at the emergency room.
4 hours
Evaluation of mortality
72 hours
Evaluation of mortality (deaths before admission )
72 hours
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ON (standard warming process + body warmer)
EXPERIMENTALPatients included during the ON periods will constitute the experimental group. Warming will be provided by the body warmer in addition to the standard warming procedure (survival blanket and heating in the emergency vehicle).
OFF / Control group (standard warming process )
SHAM COMPARATORPatients included during the OFF periods will constitute the control group. Warming will be provided by the standard warming procedure : survival blanket and heating in the emergency vehicle.
Interventions
The body warmer will be wrapped in a waterproof treatment field to avoid the risk of burns, 2 body warmer will be applied on the inguinal crease and 2 on the subclavicular fossa.
Warming only according to the standard procedure : survival blanket and heating in the emergency vehicle.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Major patient with all-cause trauma Grade A or B
- Patient with a trans-tympanic body temperature of less than 36°Celsius (C) at primary management by terrestrial or heliport Mobile Emergency Service team.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient initially supported by a pre-hospital medical team who does not participate in the study,
- Patient with cardiopulmonary arrest at initial pre-hospital medical team management,
- Patient with bilateral otorrhagia (due to the non-feasibility of trans tympanic temperature),
- Patient with inguinal crease or subclavicular fossa injury,
- Patient with severe burn (Burnt Body Surface\> 20%),
- Patient deprived of liberty including patients with an electronic bracelet.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
SAMU 69 - SMUR - Hôpital Edouard Herriot
Lyon, 69003, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Delphine HUGENSCHMITT
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 15, 2019
First Posted
June 3, 2019
Study Start
October 17, 2019
Primary Completion
April 27, 2022
Study Completion
April 27, 2022
Last Updated
June 3, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05