Evaluation of Bone Mineral Density Changes Using Two Tibial Base Plate Designs in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Young Patient
Randomized Clinical Evaluation of Bone Mineral Density Changes Using Two Tibial Base Plate Designs in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Young Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
88
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Arthritic disease in people less than 60 years old is increasingly common. Younger, active individuals often present now to orthopaedic surgeons requiring treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Knee arthroplasty has been offered as a viable option to provide pain relief and improve function in the middle-aged patient. In a previous study submitted for publication, the investigators have looked at BMD in vivo after total knee replacement comparing two different tibial base plate designs in cemented and uncemented implants in terms of stiffness and modularity, and its effect on bone density changes, synovitis, osteolysis or survivorship. The investigators found a difference of 18% in bone mineral density favoring trabecular metal implant over cemented modular metal-back implant in patient between 55 and 75 years of age. The trabecular metal implant thus behaved as it was expected and preserved bone density in an elderly population. No randomized clinical trial has looked at cemented titanium tibial insert to uncemented trabecular metal tibia insert in young population. In order to isolate stiffness as study variable, one would aim at randomizing a homogeneous patient population undergoing total knee arthroplasty with implants of similar articular geometry designs with different tibial baseplate, titanium versus trabecular metal. The trabecular metal implant is closer to human bone modulus of elasticity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
Started Aug 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 5, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 27, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 31, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2020
CompletedFebruary 18, 2020
February 1, 2020
8.4 years
May 27, 2019
February 17, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
DEXA Scan
This exam will quantify the amount of bone density at 24 months after total knee arthroplasty. DXA scan can provide accurate, high-quality measurements of periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) with minimal precision error and a low coeficient of variation ranging from 1.3% to 4.7%17.
24 months post-op
KOOS (knee injury and osteoarthritis outcomes score )
The Index is self-administered and assesses the 5 subscales: pain (9 questions), other symptoms (7 questions), function in daily living (17 questions), function in sports and recreation (5) and knee related quality of live (4). All subscales are on 100, 100 being the best score, 0 the worst. The total score is an average of all subscale
2 years post-op
KSS (Knee Society Score)
The original KSS has a "Knee Score" section (7 items) and a "Functional Score" section (3 items). Both sections are scored from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of worse knee conditions and higher scores being indicative of better knee conditions.
2 years post-op
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The 12-item medical outcomes study short form health survey version 2.0 (SF-12v2)
2 years post-op
Lyshom and Tegner
2 years post-op
Study Arms (4)
45-54 y.o / cemented modular metal-backed tibial implant
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group will undergo a surgery for a knee arthroplasty following standard procedure at our center
55-59 y.o / cemented modular metal-backed tibial implant
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group will undergo a surgery for a knee arthroplasty following standard procedure at our center
45-54 y.o / uncemented Trabecular Metal modular tibial implant
EXPERIMENTALThis group will undergo a surgery for a knee arthroplasty with a trabecular metal of the tibial implant
55-59 y.o / uncemented Trabecular Metal modular tibial implant
EXPERIMENTALThis group will undergo a surgery for a knee arthroplasty with a trabecular metal of the tibial implant
Interventions
Tibial implant will be done with a cemented implant
Tibial implant will be done with a uncemented implant
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Tricompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee
- Age, under 60 years old at the time of surgery
- Stable health (the patient should be able to undergo surgery and participate in a follow-up program based upon physical examination and medical history).
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosis of inflammatory joint disease
- Diagnosis of osteonecrosis
- Infection; acute or chronic
- Any current metal hardware on the proximal 25 cm of the tibia
- History, remote or recent, of high tibial osteotomy or tibial plateau fracture
- Any collateral ligamentous instability in the affected knee
- Contra lateral below knee or above knee amputation
- Ongoing Biphosphonate pharmacotherapy
- Presence of clinically significant disease of the cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, hematologic,respiratory, endocrine, neurological, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, immune systems or other medical condition which is not well controlled.
- Participants of a study who have received an investigational drug or device within the last 30 days
- Patients unwilling or unable to cooperate in a follow-up program
- Bone deficit (subchondral cyst)
- Previous contralateral Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), ORIF, HTO
- Patella deficiency needing grafting or preventing patella resurfacing
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Centre Integre Universitaire de Sante et Services Sociaux du Nord de l'ile de Montreallead
- Zimmer Biometcollaborator
- CHU de Québeccollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michel Malo, ND
Hôpital Sacré-Coeur de Montréal
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Orthopaedic surgeon
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 27, 2019
First Posted
May 31, 2019
Study Start
August 5, 2011
Primary Completion
December 30, 2019
Study Completion
December 30, 2020
Last Updated
February 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02