Vascular Access Outcome Measure for Function: a vaLidation Study In haemoDialysis
VALID
1 other identifier
observational
702
7 countries
10
Brief Summary
A functioning vascular access provides a lifeline for patients requiring haemodialysis but vascular access dysfunction remains one of the leading causes of excessive morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs in this group. Despite increasing numbers of vascular access trials, successful interventions to improve vascular access function have been sparse and compromised by highly variable, often selectively reported outcome measures of limited relevance to patients and health professionals. Through engagement of all relevant stakeholders including patients and caregivers, vascular access function, defined by the need for interventions to enable and maintain the use of a vascular access for haemodialysis, has been identified as one of the most critically important outcome measures for trials in haemodialysis. This prospective, multi-centre, multinational validation study aims to assess the accuracy and feasibility of measuring vascular access function part of routine clinical practice and across different clinical settings to ensure successful global implementation of this core outcome measure in future trials in haemodialysis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Dec 2019
Typical duration for all trials
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 10, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 6, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 17, 2023
CompletedMay 10, 2024
August 1, 2022
2.9 years
May 10, 2019
May 8, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reporting of vascular access function, defined by the need for any intervention(s) required to enable and maintain the use of a vascular access for haemodialysis. Vascular access interventions to be collected are outlined in the description below.
Arteriovenous fistula (AVF)/Arteriovenous graft (AVG) * Open surgical or endovascular creation/placement of AVF/AVG * Open surgical revision or endovascular intervention of AVG/AVF * Thrombolysis or thrombectomy of AVG/AVF * Ligation or resection of arteriovenous access * Repair of aneurysm/pseudoaneurysm * Competing/collateral vein ligation * Fistulogram (Angiogram) +/- angioplasty +/- stenting (including inflow artery, body of AVF/AVG, venous outflow, central vein) * Competing/collateral vein embolisation * Superficialisation/transposition * Management of Dialysis Associated Steal Syndrome (DASS)/Access Induced Ischaemia. Procedures include: * Distal Revascularisation, Interval Ligation (DRIL) * Proximalisation of the Arterial Inflow (PAI) * Revision Using Distal Inflow (RUDI) * Banding Central venous catheter (CVC) * CVC insertion * CVC exchange * Fibrin sheath removal/disruption * CVC removal
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Rate of vascular access interventions to enable and maintain the use of a vascular access for haemodialysis (number/patient-year).
6 months
Time to first vascular access intervention to enable and maintain the use of a vascular access for haemodialysis (days).
6 months
Type of vascular access interventions.
6 months
Other Outcomes (7)
Time required for measuring vascular access function (minutes)
6 months
Completeness of data collection (percentage)
6 months
Likert score of feasibility questionnaire with data collectors (scale of 1 to 5, 1=strongly disagree, 5=strongly agree)
6 months
- +4 more other outcomes
Eligibility Criteria
All patients receiving chronic haemodialysis in the participating unit and who are able and willing to provide informed consent, will be invited to take part in the trial. Patients who are expected to require haemodialysis for less than 3 months due to anticipated recovery of renal function will be excluded. The eligibility criteria are deliberately kept broad to reflect routine clinical practice (i.e. not excluding non-English speaking patients) and avoid selection bias within participating units. Paediatric patients are excluded because vascular access outcomes were not considered a core outcome domain for research in paediatric patients with chronic kidney disease as established by the SONG-Kids initiative involving children, adolescence, their family members, and health professionals.
You may qualify if:
- Patients new to or established on chronic haemodialysis (i.e. incident and prevalent patients on chronic haemodialysis)
- Patients 18 years or more of age
- Able to provide informed consent (if consent is required).
You may not qualify if:
- Anticipated to require haemodialysis for less than 90 days
- Treating team considers patient unsuitable to be enrolled
- Patient or authorised representative not willing to consent (if consent is required).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The University of Queenslandlead
- Australasian Kidney Trials Networkcollaborator
Study Sites (10)
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, 4110, Australia
Mackay Hospital
Mackay, Queensland, 4740, Australia
Mater Hospital
Brisbane, Australia
Hervey Bay Hospital
Hervey Bay, Australia
University Health Network
Toronto, Canada
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours
Tours, France
Hospital Sultanah Aminah Johor Bahru
Johor Bahru, Malaysia
Maastricht University Medical Centre
Maastricht, Netherlands
Ospedale Regionale di Lugano
Lugano, Switzerland
Sheffield Teaching Hospital
Sheffield, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Viecelli AK, Teixeira-Pinto A, Valks A, Baer R, Cherian R, Cippa PE, Craig JC, DeSilva R, Jaure A, Johnson DW, Kiriwandeniya C, Kopperschmidt P, Liu WJ, Lee T, Lok C, Madhan K, Mallard AR, Oliver V, Polkinghorne KR, Quinn RR, Reidlinger D, Roberts M, Sautenet B, Hooi LS, Smith R, Snoeijs M, Tordoir J, Vachharajani TJ, Vanholder R, Vergara LA, Wilkie M, Yang B, Yuo TH, Zou L, Hawley CM; VALID Investigator Team. Study protocol for Vascular Access outcome measure for function: a vaLidation study In hemoDialysis (VALID) : A multi-center, multinational validation study to assess the accuracy and feasibility of measuring vascular access function in clinical practice. BMC Nephrol. 2022 Nov 19;23(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12882-022-02987-1.
PMID: 36402958DERIVED
Related Links
- Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of health research (EQUATOR network). STARD 2015: An updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.
- Standardised Outcomes in Nephrology (SONG) initiative. SONG-Haemodialysis Vascular Access Expert Working Group
- Standardised Outcomes in Nephrology (SONG) Initiative. SONG Handbook (Version 1, 1st June 2017) for establishing and implementing core outcomes in chronic kidney disease.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrea Viecelli, MD, FRAC
Princess Alexandra Hospital and Australasian Kidney Trials Network
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 10, 2019
First Posted
May 31, 2019
Study Start
December 6, 2019
Primary Completion
October 30, 2022
Study Completion
February 17, 2023
Last Updated
May 10, 2024
Record last verified: 2022-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- This process will be in effect for a period of 2 to 5 years following publication of the main study results. Proposals may be submitted up to 5 years following article publication. After 5 years, the data will be available in the Sponsor's data warehouse but without investigator support other than deposited metadata.
- Access Criteria
- An independent review board will assess proposals based on the following criteria: sound science, benefit-risk balancing and research team expertise.
Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the primary publication, after deidentification (text, tables, figures and appendices) will be available for individual participant data meta-analysis.