Peer-Educator-coordinated vs Nurse-coordinated ART Refill for Adolescents and Young Adults Living With HIV in Lesotho
PEBRA
1 other identifier
interventional
307
1 country
20
Brief Summary
Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is home to 85% of the adolescents and young people living with HIV (AYPLHIV) globally and they are heavily affected by the HIV/AIDS epidemic: AYPLHIV in SSA are the only population group for whom HIV-related mortality continues to increase, and they have overall poorer outcomes than all other age groups. Lesotho with worldwide the second-highest HIV prevalence shows a viral suppression rate among AYPLHIV of only 49%. In order to address the multiple barriers in the adolescent HIV care cascade and their unique needs, multicomponent packages of differentiated service delivery (DSD) are a promising approach. In close collaboration with different local stakeholders, the researchers designed a DSD model specifically for AYPLHIV, called the PEBRA model. In the PEBRA model the peer-educator (PE) plays a pivotal role, by coordinating the ART refill/care according to the patient's preferences using a tablet-based application, called PEBRApp (https://github.com/chrisly-bear/PEBRApp). The PEBRApp helps the PE to assess each participant's preference, to adapt the ART refill according to these preferences in a feasible manner, to keep track of the ART refill, and to ensure regular contact between the PE and the participant. The model includes key innovative options such as individualized automatic SMS notifications and decentralized ART delivery. The PEBRApp was developed with ❤️ by Technify Maseru, Lesotho (www.technifyls.com) \& Christoph Schwizer Zurich, Switzerland (www.christophschwizer.ch).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2019
20 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2021
CompletedJune 2, 2021
May 1, 2021
1.5 years
May 9, 2019
May 31, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
In care with documented viral suppression
In care with documented viral suppression at 12 months, defined as the proportion of participants in care with a documented VL \<20 copies/mL 12 months (range: 9 - 15 months) after enrolment out of all participants enrolled
12 months (range: 9 - 15 months) after enrolment
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Adherence to ART at 3 months (range 2.5 - 3.5), 6 months (range 5 - 8) and 12 months (range 9 - 15) after enrolment
3 months (range 2.5 - 3.5), 6 months (range 5 - 8) and 12 months (range 9 - 15) after enrolment
Quality of Life (QoL) at 6 months (range 5 - 8) and 12 months (range 9 - 15) after enrolment
6 months (range 5 - 8) and 12 months (range 9 - 15) after enrolment
Perceived quality of ART Care / patient service satisfaction at 6 months (range 5 - 8) and 12 months (range 9 - 15) after enrolment
6 months (range 5 - 8) and 12 months (range 9 - 15) after enrolment
Engagement in care at 6 months
6 months (range 5 - 8) after enrolment
Alternative viral suppression at 12 months
12 months (range 9 - 15) after enrolment
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
within 12 months after enrolment
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in the intervention clusters are offered the PEBRA model. In the PEBRA model the ART visit/refill is coordinated by the Peer-Educator (PE) according to the participants' preferences, using a tablet-based application, called PEBRApp. The preference assessment entails the following three domains of DSD: 1. ART Refill 2. SMS notifications 3. Support In each of the domains, the participants' preferences will be assessed and the most feasible option will be selected. The PEBRApp not only helps the PE to assess each participants' preference, but also to keep track of the ART refill, and to ensure regular contact between the PE and the participant. The model includes key innovative options such as individualized automatic SMS notifications and decentralized ART delivery.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants in the control clusters are offered standard of care: ART visit/refill is coordinated by the nurse, is mostly clinic-based, not adapted to youth, and differentiated according to clinical values (i.e. if VL suppressed then option of ART Refill in a Community Adherence Club).
Interventions
The participants in the intervention clusters are offered the PEBRA model. In the PEBRA model the ART visit/refill is coordinated by the PE, as much as feasible according to the participants' preferences. Thus, the preferences of each participant are captured at enrolment and after a strict schedule thereafter. The PE conducts the preference assessment using a tablet-based application, called PEBRApp, accoring to a specific schedule. First, the participant will be asked his/her preference regarding different domains of DSD (see below) and this will be entered into the PEBRApp. Secondly, the chosen preferences are assessed regarding feasibility with specific questions, as not all preference options are available to everyone all the time. The preference assessment entails the following three domains of DSD: 1. ART Refill 2. SMS notifications 3. Support
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- the cluster is a public or missionary health center from the study districts, that offers ART services
- the cluster has at least one PE who is willing to participate and fulfills the following criteria:
- underwent the Sentebale Peer-Educator two-weeks training
- attended and successfully passed the study training assessment
You may not qualify if:
- health facility authority opposed to trial participation (verbal assent)
- the health facility is a hospital
- the health facility is situated in an area without cellphone signal
- Eligibility - individuals
- Individual is living with HIV and in care in a participating cluster
- Individual is 15-24 years old (AYPLHIV)
- Informed consent given
- Declares to seek the next follow-up visit at the same health facility
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Amstutz Alainlead
- International AIDS Society (CIPHER grant)collaborator
- Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institutecollaborator
- SolidarMedcollaborator
- Sentebalecollaborator
- University of Baselcollaborator
- University Hospital, Basel, Switzerlandcollaborator
- Swiss National Science Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (20)
Boiketsiso HC
Butha-Buthe, 400, Lesotho
Linakeng HC
Butha-Buthe, 400, Lesotho
Makhunoane HC
Butha-Buthe, 400, Lesotho
Motete HC
Butha-Buthe, 400, Lesotho
Muela HC
Butha-Buthe, 400, Lesotho
Ngoajane HC
Butha-Buthe, 400, Lesotho
Rampai HC
Butha-Buthe, 400, Lesotho
St. Paul HC
Butha-Buthe, 400, Lesotho
St. Peters HC
Butha-Buthe, 400, Lesotho
Tsime HC
Butha-Buthe, 400, Lesotho
Ha Lejone HC
Hlotse, Lesotho
Pontmain
Hlotse, Lesotho
Libibing HC
Mokhotlong, Lesotho
Linakaneng HC
Mokhotlong, Lesotho
Malefiloane HC
Mokhotlong, Lesotho
Mapholaneng HC
Mokhotlong, Lesotho
Moeketsane HC
Mokhotlong, Lesotho
Molikaliko HC
Mokhotlong, Lesotho
St. James HC
Mokhotlong, Lesotho
St. Martins HC
Mokhotlong, Lesotho
Related Publications (3)
Seiler O, Kopo M, Kao M, Lejone TI, Tschumi N, Glass TR, Brown JA, Labhardt ND, Amstutz A. HIV Care Preferences among Young People Living with HIV in Lesotho: A Secondary Data Analysis of the PEBRA Cluster Randomized Trial. AIDS Res Treat. 2023 Apr 14;2023:8124192. doi: 10.1155/2023/8124192. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 39691584DERIVEDKopo M, Lejone TI, Tschumi N, Glass TR, Kao M, Brown JA, Seiler O, Muhairwe J, Moletsane N, Labhardt ND, Amstutz A. Effectiveness of a peer educator-coordinated preference-based differentiated service delivery model on viral suppression among young people living with HIV in Lesotho: The PEBRA cluster-randomized trial. PLoS Med. 2023 Jan 3;20(1):e1004150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004150. eCollection 2023 Jan.
PMID: 36595523DERIVEDLejone TI, Kopo M, Bachmann N, Brown JA, Glass TR, Muhairwe J, Matsela T, Scherrer R, Chere L, Namane T, Labhardt ND, Amstutz A. PEBRA trial - effect of a peer-educator coordinated preference-based ART service delivery model on viral suppression among adolescents and young adults living with HIV: protocol of a cluster-randomized clinical trial in rural Lesotho. BMC Public Health. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08535-6.
PMID: 32228531DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Niklaus Labhardt, MD MIH
Swiss TPH & University Hospital Basel & University of Basel
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alain Amstutz, MD
Swiss TPH & University Hospital Basel & University of Basel
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mathebe Kopo
SolidarMed
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jennifer Brown, MSc
Swiss TPH & University of Basel
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Nadine Bachmann, MSc
Swiss TPH & University of Basel
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Thabo Lejone, MIH
SolidarMed
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Lebohang Sao, MD
DHMT BB
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Tracy Glass, PhD
Swiss TPH & University of Basel
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2019
First Posted
May 31, 2019
Study Start
November 1, 2019
Primary Completion
April 30, 2021
Study Completion
April 30, 2021
Last Updated
June 2, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
- Time Frame
- Any time.
- Access Criteria
- Data from this study, including deidentified participant data, study protocol, and informed consent documents will be made available to researchers. To access data, researchers should contact the corresponding author. Researchers will need to present a concept sheet for their proposed analysis. This will have to be reviewed and approved by all co-authors. The co-authors will consider overlap of the proposed project with active or planned analyses and the appropriateness of study data for the proposed analysis.