Preventing Persistent Post-Surgical Pain and Dysfunction
PrePARE
2 other identifiers
interventional
402
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Primary Aim: To examine the superior efficacy of ACT versus Attention Control (AC) on postoperative pain intensity and functioning in at-risk Veterans undergoing TKA. Changes in pain intensity and functioning from baseline to 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-TKA will be compared. Level of pain intensity will be measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Severity Subscale and level of functioning will be measured using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Activities of Daily Living and Quality Of Life Subscales. Secondary Aims: A) To examine the superior efficacy of ACT versus AC on the severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms and improvements in coping skills. Changes from baseline to 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-TKA will be compared. Anxiety and depressive symptoms will be measured with the Hamilton Rating Scales (Ham-A and Ham-D, respectively). Coping skills (i.e. Pain Acceptance and Engagement in Values-Based Behavior) will be measured with the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire and the Chronic Pain Values Inventory. B) To evaluate whether decreases in distress-based symptoms and increases in coping skills mediate changes in pain and functioning at 6 months in Veterans receiving ACT. Changes in anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, pain acceptance and engagement in values-based behavior from baseline to 6 weeks and 3 months will be used as potential mediators for changes in pain and functioning at 6 months. Exploratory Aim: Describe the pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies Veterans are using to manage pain and their perceived helpfulness. This will provide insights into the effects of the current opioid restrictions on pain management strategies. These strategies \& their perceived helpfulness will be assessed using the Pain Management Strategies Survey at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, and 6 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable pain
Started Jul 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 24, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 29, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 29, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 6, 2026
CompletedMay 6, 2026
April 1, 2026
4 years
May 24, 2019
April 8, 2025
April 15, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pain Intensity
Pain will be measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Scale: 0-10, with higher scores meaning worse pain
6 weeks postop, 3 months postop and 6 months postop
Function
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Activities of Daily Living (ADL) subscore. Scale: 0-100, with lower scores indicating poorer function.
6 weeks postop, 3 months postop, and 6 months postop
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Anxiety
6 weeks postop, 3 months postop, and 6 months postop
Depressive Symptoms
6 weeks postop, 3 months postop, and 6 months postop
Level of Pain Acceptance
6 weeks postop, 3 months postop, and 6 months postop
Level of Success in Engagement in Values-Based Behavior
6 weeks postop, 3 months postop, and 6 months postop
Number of Participants Using Pain Management Strategies
3 months postop and 6 months postop
Study Arms (2)
Attention Control (AC)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe primary purpose of this workshop is to provide attention and education to participants. Topics of discussion will include: a) the pathophysiology of postoperative pain and how it differs from preoperative pain, b) the role of contextual factors (e.g., depressive or anxiety symptoms, expectation) on the experience of pain, d) the role of inflammation in pain and healing, e) types of pain medications and other pain relief strategies provided following surgery, and f) goals of pain medications. Additionally, deep (diaphragmatic) breathing strategies will be taught and a progressive muscle relaxation exercise will be performed in the workshop at strategic times to maintain Veteran engagement.
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)
EXPERIMENTALThe ACT intervention will include: 1) Acceptance and Mindfulness Training emphasizing new ways of managing troubling thoughts, feelings, and physical sensations (e.g., learning how to recognize, and develop cognitive distance from, unhelpful thoughts such as "I can't take this pain anymore" or "This is unfair") and learning how to willingly face experiences that cannot be changed; and 2) Behavioral Change Training involving a) teaching patients how to recognize ineffective patterns of behavior and habits, b) exploring and setting life goals and goals related to mental and physical health, and c) promoting effective and committed actions to achieve these goals despite the urge to do otherwise. The workshop will also include information on pain and pain control post-TKA.
Interventions
Overall, the goal of the ACT intervention is to cultivate psychological flexibility: to help Veterans respond to life events in ways which do not exacerbate difficulties or restrict engagement in meaningful activities. It increases patients' awareness of behaviors that exacerbate the pain (such as struggling with it) and recognition of avoidance strategies that interfere with life engagement.
Information on any other coping practices will be omitted. The group facilitators will present one topic at a time, using the Pain Manual, and the participants will discuss and reflect about issues and experiences related to each topic. If necessary, the group facilitators will raise specific discussion questions to facilitate group dialogue and participant involvement.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- scheduled for unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
- identified to be "at-risk" at the enrollment visit (i.e. worst pain ≥7 on BPI (severe pain) OR worst pain ≥3 (moderate pain) on BPI PLUS anxiety symptoms ≥6 on the Anxiety Subscale of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale \[DASS-21\] or ≥10 on the Stress Subscale of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale \[DASS-21\] OR depressive symptoms ≥7 on Depression Subscale of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale \[DASS-21\] OR \>20 on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale \[PCS\].
You may not qualify if:
- inability to complete study forms/procedures because of a language/literacy barrier;
- bipolar or psychotic disorder
- history of brain injury
- cognitive impairment (determined by score of \<21 \[high school or above\] or \<20 \[\< high school\] on the Veterans Affairs Saint Louis University Mental Status \[SLUMS\] exam)
- ACT therapy within the past year
- inability to attend workshop prior to surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Iowalead
- Baylor College of Medicinecollaborator
- National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)collaborator
- Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Centercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Iowa City VAMC
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
Related Publications (2)
Shanahan ML, Zimmerman B, Rodrigues M, Green D, Embree J, Buckwalter J, Garvin L, Hadlandsmyth K, Smith T, Rakel B, Dindo L. Intersectional pain disparities and resilience in veterans with chronic pain. Health Psychol. 2026 Jan;45(1):123-135. doi: 10.1037/hea0001555.
PMID: 41396638DERIVEDDindo L, Hadlandsmyth K, Garvin L, Marchman J, Zimmerman MB, Buckwalter JA 4th, Green DM, Wollaeger JK, Strayer A, Kim KS, Liu W, Embree J, Rodrigues M, Rakel BA. ACT for postsurgical pain and dysfunction in at-risk veterans: Multisite, double-blind, cluster RCT. J Psychosom Res. 2025 Nov;198:112393. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112393. Epub 2025 Sep 24.
PMID: 41032959DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
There were three limitations of this study: 1. A treatment as usual group was not included to know whether the two active treatments resulted in significantly better outcomes than no added treatment. 2. Due to the COVID pandemic, group workshops had to be revised from in-person to virtual which may have influenced the results. 3. The sample was primarily male. While this is representative of the veteran population, these results are not generalizable to female veterans.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Barbara Rakel, Professor Emeritus
- Organization
- University of Iowa
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Barbara Rakel, PhD
University of Iowa
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This is a double-blind study. Participants and outcome assessors are blinded to treatment. Allocation to intervention group remains concealed until the beginning of the workshop when all invited participants have arrived. Those in attendance will receive the assigned intervention.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 24, 2019
First Posted
May 29, 2019
Study Start
July 29, 2019
Primary Completion
July 30, 2023
Study Completion
January 30, 2024
Last Updated
May 6, 2026
Results First Posted
May 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data generated from this application will be shared with members of the research team (i.e., PIs and investigators) to address alternative research questions that were not included in the original application but that can be addressed from the data generated and are of particular interest to the research team members. These data will also be shared through publications, as appropriate. This sharing will be fostered and coordinated by the PIs in a manner that is consistent with NIH policy and human subject's protection including Privacy Rules. Finally, data from the study will be archived and stored at the University of Iowa, College of Nursing on a secure server for future use by other researchers outside the research team. The data manager, in collaboration with the project director, will be responsible for the archiving of these data.