NCT03965897

Brief Summary

Primary Aim: To examine the superior efficacy of ACT versus Attention Control (AC) on postoperative pain intensity and functioning in at-risk Veterans undergoing TKA. Changes in pain intensity and functioning from baseline to 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-TKA will be compared. Level of pain intensity will be measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Severity Subscale and level of functioning will be measured using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Activities of Daily Living and Quality Of Life Subscales. Secondary Aims: A) To examine the superior efficacy of ACT versus AC on the severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms and improvements in coping skills. Changes from baseline to 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-TKA will be compared. Anxiety and depressive symptoms will be measured with the Hamilton Rating Scales (Ham-A and Ham-D, respectively). Coping skills (i.e. Pain Acceptance and Engagement in Values-Based Behavior) will be measured with the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire and the Chronic Pain Values Inventory. B) To evaluate whether decreases in distress-based symptoms and increases in coping skills mediate changes in pain and functioning at 6 months in Veterans receiving ACT. Changes in anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, pain acceptance and engagement in values-based behavior from baseline to 6 weeks and 3 months will be used as potential mediators for changes in pain and functioning at 6 months. Exploratory Aim: Describe the pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies Veterans are using to manage pain and their perceived helpfulness. This will provide insights into the effects of the current opioid restrictions on pain management strategies. These strategies \& their perceived helpfulness will be assessed using the Pain Management Strategies Survey at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, and 6 months.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
402

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 24, 2019

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 29, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 29, 2019

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 30, 2023

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 30, 2024

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 6, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 6, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4 years

First QC Date

May 24, 2019

Results QC Date

April 8, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 15, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Pain Intensity

    Pain will be measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Scale: 0-10, with higher scores meaning worse pain

    6 weeks postop, 3 months postop and 6 months postop

  • Function

    Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Activities of Daily Living (ADL) subscore. Scale: 0-100, with lower scores indicating poorer function.

    6 weeks postop, 3 months postop, and 6 months postop

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Anxiety

    6 weeks postop, 3 months postop, and 6 months postop

  • Depressive Symptoms

    6 weeks postop, 3 months postop, and 6 months postop

  • Level of Pain Acceptance

    6 weeks postop, 3 months postop, and 6 months postop

  • Level of Success in Engagement in Values-Based Behavior

    6 weeks postop, 3 months postop, and 6 months postop

  • Number of Participants Using Pain Management Strategies

    3 months postop and 6 months postop

Study Arms (2)

Attention Control (AC)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The primary purpose of this workshop is to provide attention and education to participants. Topics of discussion will include: a) the pathophysiology of postoperative pain and how it differs from preoperative pain, b) the role of contextual factors (e.g., depressive or anxiety symptoms, expectation) on the experience of pain, d) the role of inflammation in pain and healing, e) types of pain medications and other pain relief strategies provided following surgery, and f) goals of pain medications. Additionally, deep (diaphragmatic) breathing strategies will be taught and a progressive muscle relaxation exercise will be performed in the workshop at strategic times to maintain Veteran engagement.

Other: Attention Control (AC)

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)

EXPERIMENTAL

The ACT intervention will include: 1) Acceptance and Mindfulness Training emphasizing new ways of managing troubling thoughts, feelings, and physical sensations (e.g., learning how to recognize, and develop cognitive distance from, unhelpful thoughts such as "I can't take this pain anymore" or "This is unfair") and learning how to willingly face experiences that cannot be changed; and 2) Behavioral Change Training involving a) teaching patients how to recognize ineffective patterns of behavior and habits, b) exploring and setting life goals and goals related to mental and physical health, and c) promoting effective and committed actions to achieve these goals despite the urge to do otherwise. The workshop will also include information on pain and pain control post-TKA.

Behavioral: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)

Interventions

Overall, the goal of the ACT intervention is to cultivate psychological flexibility: to help Veterans respond to life events in ways which do not exacerbate difficulties or restrict engagement in meaningful activities. It increases patients' awareness of behaviors that exacerbate the pain (such as struggling with it) and recognition of avoidance strategies that interfere with life engagement.

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)

Information on any other coping practices will be omitted. The group facilitators will present one topic at a time, using the Pain Manual, and the participants will discuss and reflect about issues and experiences related to each topic. If necessary, the group facilitators will raise specific discussion questions to facilitate group dialogue and participant involvement.

Attention Control (AC)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • scheduled for unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
  • identified to be "at-risk" at the enrollment visit (i.e. worst pain ≥7 on BPI (severe pain) OR worst pain ≥3 (moderate pain) on BPI PLUS anxiety symptoms ≥6 on the Anxiety Subscale of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale \[DASS-21\] or ≥10 on the Stress Subscale of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale \[DASS-21\] OR depressive symptoms ≥7 on Depression Subscale of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale \[DASS-21\] OR \>20 on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale \[PCS\].

You may not qualify if:

  • inability to complete study forms/procedures because of a language/literacy barrier;
  • bipolar or psychotic disorder
  • history of brain injury
  • cognitive impairment (determined by score of \<21 \[high school or above\] or \<20 \[\< high school\] on the Veterans Affairs Saint Louis University Mental Status \[SLUMS\] exam)
  • ACT therapy within the past year
  • inability to attend workshop prior to surgery

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Iowa City VAMC

Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Shanahan ML, Zimmerman B, Rodrigues M, Green D, Embree J, Buckwalter J, Garvin L, Hadlandsmyth K, Smith T, Rakel B, Dindo L. Intersectional pain disparities and resilience in veterans with chronic pain. Health Psychol. 2026 Jan;45(1):123-135. doi: 10.1037/hea0001555.

  • Dindo L, Hadlandsmyth K, Garvin L, Marchman J, Zimmerman MB, Buckwalter JA 4th, Green DM, Wollaeger JK, Strayer A, Kim KS, Liu W, Embree J, Rodrigues M, Rakel BA. ACT for postsurgical pain and dysfunction in at-risk veterans: Multisite, double-blind, cluster RCT. J Psychosom Res. 2025 Nov;198:112393. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112393. Epub 2025 Sep 24.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PainAnxiety DisordersDepression

Interventions

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsMental DisordersBehavioral SymptomsBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyBehavior TherapyPsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and Activities

Limitations and Caveats

There were three limitations of this study: 1. A treatment as usual group was not included to know whether the two active treatments resulted in significantly better outcomes than no added treatment. 2. Due to the COVID pandemic, group workshops had to be revised from in-person to virtual which may have influenced the results. 3. The sample was primarily male. While this is representative of the veteran population, these results are not generalizable to female veterans.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Barbara Rakel, Professor Emeritus
Organization
University of Iowa

Study Officials

  • Barbara Rakel, PhD

    University of Iowa

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
This is a double-blind study. Participants and outcome assessors are blinded to treatment. Allocation to intervention group remains concealed until the beginning of the workshop when all invited participants have arrived. Those in attendance will receive the assigned intervention.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This study uses a cluster randomization approach where the unit of randomization is the workshops. Randomization occurs at the start of each workshop so that all participants attending that workshop are randomized to that intervention (i.e. ACT vs. AC). Statistician Dr. Zimmerman generates the randomization sequence using PLAN procedure (SAS v9.2). Randomization of workshops occurs in permuted blocks of 2 and 4 and are stratified by site (i.e. Iowa City versus Houston).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2019

First Posted

May 29, 2019

Study Start

July 29, 2019

Primary Completion

July 30, 2023

Study Completion

January 30, 2024

Last Updated

May 6, 2026

Results First Posted

May 6, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Data generated from this application will be shared with members of the research team (i.e., PIs and investigators) to address alternative research questions that were not included in the original application but that can be addressed from the data generated and are of particular interest to the research team members. These data will also be shared through publications, as appropriate. This sharing will be fostered and coordinated by the PIs in a manner that is consistent with NIH policy and human subject's protection including Privacy Rules. Finally, data from the study will be archived and stored at the University of Iowa, College of Nursing on a secure server for future use by other researchers outside the research team. The data manager, in collaboration with the project director, will be responsible for the archiving of these data.

Locations