Pre-pectoral Versus Sub-pectoral Implant Placement in Immediate Breast Reconstruction
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Pre-pectoral Versus Sub-pectoral Implant Placement in Immediate Breast Reconstruction
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Despite the popularity and proved safety of prepectoral implant-based reconstruction, there is little evidence on long-term results and variables which could influence surgical outcome. So far, no specific guidelines or indications have been developed for prepectoral technique and heterogeneous inclusion criteria had been used in previous reports. There is a lack of studies documenting outcomes following ADM-assisted prepectoral breast reconstruction, and there are no randomised controlled trial studies that drawing a direct comparison of clinical or patient-reported outcomes between subpectoral and prepectoral groups. The investigators hypothesized that immediate acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction with prepectoral implant placement would result in less early postoperative pain but more reported implant rippling, requirement of more fat grafting and an equitable safety profile compared with ADM-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction with subpectoral implant placement. The aim of this study is to evaluate the postsurgical pain, complications and patient-reported outcomes of prepectoral breast reconstruction versus subpectoral implant placement in immediate breast reconstruction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 10, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 22, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 22, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2023
CompletedApril 27, 2022
April 1, 2022
3.4 years
May 10, 2019
April 26, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative Pain and 24-hour narcotic consumption
Postoperative Pain will be scored using Numerical rating scale. The scale ranges from 0 to 10 indicating the level of pain. Zero indicates the absence of pain, while 10 represents the most intense pain (no pain = 0, mild = 1-3, moderate = 4-6, severe = 7-10).
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Mastectomy flap necrosis
4 weeks
Rate of seroma
4 weeks
Rate of infection
3 months
Rate of Explantation
1 year
Number of Revisional surgeries
1 year
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Prepectoral implant placement
EXPERIMENTALImmediate acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction with prepectoral implant placement.
Subpectoral implant placement
ACTIVE COMPARATORImmediate acellular dermal matrix-assisted implant-based breast reconstruction with subpectoral implant placement.
Interventions
On the day of surgery, after the completion of the mastectomy, the vascularity of the mastectomy flaps will be evaluated, and debridement is performed where necessary. A temporary implant sizer is placed in the pocket to assess the position and shape of the prepectoral pocket. The pocket is adjusted where necessary. A sheet of ADM (DermAcell) is then selected. The DermAcell will be prepared as per the manufacture's instructions and fenestrated using size 11 blade. The DermACELL piece will be trimmed to the appropriate shape and sutured to the superior medial and lateral edges of the pectoralis major muscle. The inferior edge will be sutured to the fascia at the level of the inframammary fold. Two closed suction drains will be placed (one below the mastectomy skin flap, and one below DermACELL). The implant will be inserted to the pre-pectoral pocket and several anchor sutures will be used to secure the superior-medial edge of DermACELL to mastectomy flap.
On the day of surgery, after the completion of the mastectomy, the vascularity of the mastectomy flaps will be evaluated, and debridement is performed where necessary. The reconstructive operative procedure will then proceeded with (1) elevation of the pectoralis major muscle with release of inferior attachments; (2) placement of implant subpectorally; (3) placement and suturing of DermACELL to constitute the inferolateral breast pocket; (4) placement of two closed suction drains (one superiorly between the pectoralis major and skin, and one inferiorly between the DermACELL and skin); (5) removal of sizer and placement of permanent to the pocket and (6) suture the inferior edge of DermACELL to the inferior edge of the pectoral major muscle. The skin will be closed and the dressing will be applied as standard protocol.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female patient
- Ages 20-80
- All patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer or prophylaxis for breast cancer with immediate implant-based reconstruction
- Able to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have had prior chest wall or irradiation on the reconstructed side
- Patients not undergoing immediate breast reconstruction at the time of mastectomy
- Any patient with a contraindication to immediate breast reconstruction.
- Patients with history of smoking, BMI\> 40, and D cup breast size or grade III ptosis are all contraindications to immediate breast reconstruction as the risk of postoperative complications are significantly higher (wound infection, dehiscence, implant loss, seroma) than the average patient and thus these patients would be excluded from the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jing Zhang, MD
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 10, 2019
First Posted
May 22, 2019
Study Start
August 22, 2019
Primary Completion
December 30, 2022
Study Completion
December 30, 2023
Last Updated
April 27, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share