Single Versus Double Drains After Mastectomy
Comparison of Single Versus Double Drains After Modified Radical Mastectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
It is not known whether decreasing the number of drains used decreases patients' discomfort and duration of hospital stay without increasing seroma formation after mastectomies. Hypothesis. Use of one drain increases patient comfort without increasing seroma formation after modified radical mastectomy (MRM) as compared to double drains. Material and Method: Sixty patients undergoing MRM at Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital will be randomised into single versus double drains groups. A negative pressure drain will be inserted below the lower flap directing to the axilla in the single drain group or two similar drains will be inserted into the axilla and below the lower flap in the double drains group. Drains will be removed if the output is less than 30 ml. Seroma is defined as fluid accumulation below the flaps and will be examined daily after the operation. One day after removal of the drains seroma under the flaps and in the axilla will be examined by ultrasonography. Age, body mass index smoking history, coexisting diseases of the patients duration of the hospital stay, duration of the drains in place, total drain output in the first three days after the operation and the need and frequency of aspirations due to seroma formation will be recorded. Patient comfort was measured with a comfort scale between 1-10 measuring incisional pain, pain caused by the drains, discomfort or sleep disturbances caused by the drains, The duration of the longer staying drain in the double drain group will be recorded for the duration of the drain in place parameter.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started Jul 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable breast-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 23, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 28, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 10, 2015
CompletedApril 10, 2015
March 1, 2015
7 months
July 23, 2014
March 9, 2015
March 25, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient Comfort Scale
Patient comfort was measured with a comfort scale between 1-10 measuring incisional pain, pain caused by the drains, discomfort or sleep disturbances caused by the drains. 1 denotes no discomfort related to drains, 10 denotes maximum discomfort unrelieved even with nonsteroid antiinflammatory analgesics. The data will be presented by median value and range (minimum-maximum).
Postoperative 5 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Seroma Formation
Twenty-four hours after removal of the drains up to 4 weeks
Other Outcomes (1)
Length of Hospital Stay
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 5 days
Study Arms (2)
Single drain
EXPERIMENTALInsertion of a single drain: A negative pressure drain will be inserted below the lower flap directing to the axilla in the single drain group. Ultrasonography after removal of the drains: One day after removal of the drains seroma under the flaps and in the axilla will be examined by ultrasonography.
Double drain
EXPERIMENTALInsertion of double drains: Two negative pressure drains will be inserted into the axilla and below the lower flap in the double drains group. Ultrasonography after removal of the drains: One day after removal of the drains seroma under the flaps and in the axilla will be examined by ultrasonography.
Interventions
A negative pressure drain will be inserted below the lower flap directing to the axilla.
Two drains will be inserted into the axilla and below the lower flap in the double drains group.
One day after removal of the drains seroma under the flaps and in the axilla will be examined by ultrasonography.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Breast cancer
- Modified radical mastectomy
You may not qualify if:
- Distant metastasis
- Male breast cancer
- Bleeding diathesis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Diskapi Training and Research Hospital
Ankara, 06110, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (5)
Akinci M, Cetin B, Aslan S, Kulacoglu H. Factors affecting seroma formation after mastectomy with full axillary dissection. Acta Chir Belg. 2009 Jul-Aug;109(4):481-3. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2009.11680464.
PMID: 19803259BACKGROUNDAitken DR, Minton JP. Complications associated with mastectomy. Surg Clin North Am. 1983 Dec;63(6):1331-52. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)43192-0. No abstract available.
PMID: 6359504BACKGROUNDJain PK, Sowdi R, Anderson AD, MacFie J. Randomized clinical trial investigating the use of drains and fibrin sealant following surgery for breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2004 Jan;91(1):54-60. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4435.
PMID: 14716794BACKGROUNDTalbot ML, Magarey CJ. Reduced use of drains following axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. ANZ J Surg. 2002 Jul;72(7):488-90. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2002.02456.x.
PMID: 12123509BACKGROUNDSaratzis A, Soumian S, Willetts R, Rastall S, Stonelake PS. Use of multiple drains after mastectomy is associated with more patient discomfort and longer postoperative stay. Clin Breast Cancer. 2009 Nov;9(4):243-6. doi: 10.3816/CBC.2009.n.041.
PMID: 19933080BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Melih Akinci, MD, Associate Prof
- Organization
- Diskapi Training and Research Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Melih Akinci
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 23, 2014
First Posted
July 28, 2014
Study Start
July 1, 2014
Primary Completion
February 1, 2015
Study Completion
February 1, 2015
Last Updated
April 10, 2015
Results First Posted
April 10, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-03