The Validity of the Quick Renal MRI in Pediatric Kidney Disease
3 other identifiers
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators propose a new imaging method for children born with congenital anomalies of the urinary tract that is a rapid, injection-, sedation-, and radiation-free alternative: the quick renal MRI. This proposal hypothesizes that the quick renal MRI has high validity compared to current radiologic standard for renal infection and scarring, the 99mTechnetium-dimercaptosuccinic acid (99mTc- DMSA) renal scan in the detection of acute renal infections and scars. If the quick renal MRI is accurate, it could potentially replace the DMSA scan for those specific questions and ease the burden of testing for children with chronic renal disease. Findings from these studies will provide preliminary data and rationale for a multi-centered study to further test this new technology. Participants will be 0-21 years of age and can expect to be on study for from 1 week (if enrolled in Aim 1) to 6 months (if enrolled in Aim 2).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 7, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 20, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 22, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2025
CompletedApril 3, 2024
April 1, 2024
5.7 years
May 20, 2019
April 2, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Sensitivity of Quick MRI as Compared to DMSA scan in Diagnosis of Suspected Acute Pyelonephritis
Children admitted for suspected acute pyelonephritis will undergo a clinical DMSA (gold-standard) renal scan and quick renal MRI to determine the sensitivity of this method. The sensitivity will be calculated with True Positive (TP) / TP + False Negative (FN)
up to 1 week
Sensitivity of Quick MRI as compared to DMSA scan in Diagnosis of Renal Scars
To establish the sensitivity of the quick renal MRI compared to the DMSA scan (using DMSA as the 'gold standard') in the diagnosis of renal scars among children with recurrent UTI. Children with recurrent Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) will undergo a clinical DMSA renal scan and quick renal MRI. The sensitivity of the quick renal MRI to detect renal scars will be determined using DMSA as the standard. The sensitivity will be calculated with TP/TP+FN.
up to 6 months
Specificity of Quick MRI as compared to DMSA scan in Diagnosis of Renal Scars
To establish the specificity of the quick renal MRI compared to the DMSA scan (using DMSA as the 'gold standard') in the diagnosis of renal scars among children with recurrent UTI. Children with recurrent UTI will undergo a clinical DMSA renal scan and quick renal MRI. The specificity of the quick renal MRI to detect renal scars will be determined using DMSA as the standard. The specificity will be calculated with True Negative (TN) / TN + False Positive (FP)
up to 6 months
Study Arms (1)
DMSA/Quick MRI
OTHERAll participants will go through DMSA and Quick MRI scan to help determine the validity of the Quick Renal MRI in pediatric kidney disease.
Interventions
A quick MRI scan takes about 15 mins or less. No IV or sedation will be necessary. The participant will be required to lie flat and still during the test. A parent will be allowed to be with the participant while they are in the scanner. The machine will produce loud intermittent sounds of banging or knocking so they will have to wear protective headphones. They can listen to music if they would like. If they are less than 1 year old, they will be swaddled and can be "held" during the test. If a child needs to have a parent in the scanner, it is ideal if the parent can have their head near the participant's legs and arms stretched out to hold the child's hands. If the parent needs to be by the patient's head, it can be accomplished by the parent lying head to head with the child or the parent lying on the child. Ideally they are lying head to head, or just outside of the scanner reaching in.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aim 1:
- Patient is admitted to American Family Children's Hospital for a febrile UTI, suspected pyelonephritis, or diagnosed pyelonephritis
- Undergoing clinical DMSA scan
- Aim 2:
- Undergoing DMSA scans as a part of their routine clinical care
- History of more than one UTI in the past year
You may not qualify if:
- Aim 1:
- No evidence of pyuria on their urine analysis
- Negative urine culture
- Not comfortable with having a Quick MRI performed
- Both aims:
- Contraindications to MRI
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
American Family Children's Hospital
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792, United States
Related Publications (34)
Freedman AL; Urologic Diseases in America Project. Urologic diseases in North America Project: trends in resource utilization for urinary tract infections in children. J Urol. 2005 Mar;173(3):949-54. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000152092.03931.9a.
PMID: 15711347BACKGROUNDHoberman A, Chao HP, Keller DM, Hickey R, Davis HW, Ellis D. Prevalence of urinary tract infection in febrile infants. J Pediatr. 1993 Jul;123(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)81531-8.
PMID: 8320616BACKGROUNDSood A, Penna FJ, Eleswarapu S, Pucheril D, Weaver J, Abd-El-Barr AE, Wagner JC, Lakshmanan Y, Menon M, Trinh QD, Sammon JD, Elder JS. Incidence, admission rates, and economic burden of pediatric emergency department visits for urinary tract infection: data from the nationwide emergency department sample, 2006 to 2011. J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Oct;11(5):246.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.10.005. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
PMID: 26005017BACKGROUNDCopp HL, Halpern MS, Maldonado Y, Shortliffe LD. Trends in hospitalization for pediatric pyelonephritis: a population based study of California from 1985 to 2006. J Urol. 2011 Sep;186(3):1028-34. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.101. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
PMID: 21784477BACKGROUNDChen MJ, Cheng HL, Chiou YY. Risk factors for renal scarring and deterioration of renal function in primary vesico-ureteral reflux children: a long-term follow-up retrospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57954. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057954. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
PMID: 23469116BACKGROUNDRushton HG, Majd M. Dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scintigraphy for the evaluation of pyelonephritis and scarring: a review of experimental and clinical studies. J Urol. 1992 Nov;148(5 Pt 2):1726-32. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37014-3.
PMID: 1331545BACKGROUNDHari P, Bagga A. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for children with vesicoureteral reflux. N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11;371(11):1071-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1408559. No abstract available.
PMID: 25207775BACKGROUNDFaust WC, Diaz M, Pohl HG. Incidence of post-pyelonephritic renal scarring: a meta-analysis of the dimercapto-succinic acid literature. J Urol. 2009 Jan;181(1):290-7; discussion 297-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.09.039. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
PMID: 19013606BACKGROUNDRushton HG, Majd M, Jantausch B, Wiedermann BL, Belman AB. Renal scarring following reflux and nonreflux pyelonephritis in children: evaluation with 99mtechnetium-dimercaptosuccinic acid scintigraphy. J Urol. 1992 May;147(5):1327-32. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37555-9.
PMID: 1314912BACKGROUNDLee LC, Lorenzo AJ, Koyle MA. The role of voiding cystourethrography in the investigation of children with urinary tract infections. Can Urol Assoc J. 2016 May-Jun;10(5-6):210-214. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.3610.
PMID: 27713802BACKGROUNDFillion ML, Watt CL, Gupta IR. Vesicoureteric reflux and reflux nephropathy: from mouse models to childhood disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2014 Apr;29(4):757-66. doi: 10.1007/s00467-014-2761-3. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
PMID: 24500705BACKGROUNDMcKibben MJ, Seed P, Ross SS, Borawski KM. Urinary Tract Infection and Neurogenic Bladder. Urol Clin North Am. 2015 Nov;42(4):527-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2015.05.006. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
PMID: 26475949BACKGROUNDOakeshott P, Hunt GM, Poulton A, Reid F. Expectation of life and unexpected death in open spina bifida: a 40-year complete, non-selective, longitudinal cohort study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010 Aug;52(8):749-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03543.x. Epub 2009 Dec 9.
PMID: 20015251BACKGROUNDWoodhouse CR. Myelomeningocele in young adults. BJU Int. 2005 Feb;95(2):223-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05374.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 15667645BACKGROUNDWang HH, Lloyd JC, Wiener JS, Routh JC. Nationwide Trends and Variations in Urological Surgical Interventions and Renal Outcome in Patients with Spina Bifida. J Urol. 2016 Apr;195(4 Pt 2):1189-94. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.11.033. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
PMID: 26926542BACKGROUNDOuyang L, Bolen J, Valdez R, Joseph D, Baum MA, Thibadeau J. Characteristics and survival of patients with end stage renal disease and spina bifida in the United States renal data system. J Urol. 2015 Feb;193(2):558-64. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.08.092. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
PMID: 25167993BACKGROUNDRouth JC, Cheng EY, Austin JC, Baum MA, Gargollo PC, Grady RW, Herron AR, Kim SS, King SJ, Koh CJ, Paramsothy P, Raman L, Schechter MS, Smith KA, Tanaka ST, Thibadeau JK, Walker WO, Wallis MC, Wiener JS, Joseph DB. Design and Methodological Considerations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Urologic and Renal Protocol for the Newborn and Young Child with Spina Bifida. J Urol. 2016 Dec;196(6):1728-1734. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.07.081. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
PMID: 27475969BACKGROUNDMacKenzie JR. A review of renal scarring in children. Nucl Med Commun. 1996 Mar;17(3):176-90. doi: 10.1097/00006231-199603000-00002.
PMID: 8692483BACKGROUNDMichaud JE, Gupta N, Baumgartner TS, Kim B, Bosemani T, Wang MH. Cost and radiation exposure in the workup of febrile pediatric urinary tract infections. J Surg Res. 2016 Jun 15;203(2):313-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.03.042. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
PMID: 27363638BACKGROUNDIskandar BJ, Sansone JM, Medow J, Rowley HA. The use of quick-brain magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of shunt-treated hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg. 2004 Nov;101(2 Suppl):147-51. doi: 10.3171/ped.2004.101.2.0147.
PMID: 15835101BACKGROUNDRozovsky K, Ventureyra EC, Miller E. Fast-brain MRI in children is quick, without sedation, and radiation-free, but beware of limitations. J Clin Neurosci. 2013 Mar;20(3):400-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.02.048. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
PMID: 23266077BACKGROUNDYue EL, Meckler GD, Fleischman RJ, Selden NR, Bardo DM, Chu O'Connor AK, Vu ET, Fu R, Spiro DM. Test characteristics of quick brain MRI for shunt evaluation in children: an alternative modality to avoid radiation. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015 Apr;15(4):420-6. doi: 10.3171/2014.9.PEDS14207. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
PMID: 25634816BACKGROUNDChristy A, Murchison C, Wilson JL. Quick Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging as a First Imaging Modality in Pediatric Stroke. Pediatr Neurol. 2018 Jan;78:55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2017.09.020. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
PMID: 29174005BACKGROUNDSheridan DC, Newgard CD, Selden NR, Jafri MA, Hansen ML. QuickBrain MRI for the detection of acute pediatric traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017 Feb;19(2):259-264. doi: 10.3171/2016.7.PEDS16204. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
PMID: 27885947BACKGROUNDThompson EM, Baird LC, Selden NR. Results of a North American survey of rapid-sequence MRI utilization to evaluate cerebral ventricles in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014 Jun;13(6):636-40. doi: 10.3171/2014.2.PEDS13567. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
PMID: 24724716BACKGROUNDKovanlikaya A, Okkay N, Cakmakci H, Ozdogan O, Degirmenci B, Kavukcu S. Comparison of MRI and renal cortical scintigraphy findings in childhood acute pyelonephritis: preliminary experience. Eur J Radiol. 2004 Jan;49(1):76-80. doi: 10.1016/S0720-048X(02)00350-9.
PMID: 14975495BACKGROUNDWeller A, Barber JL, Olsen OE. Gadolinium and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: an update. Pediatr Nephrol. 2014 Oct;29(10):1927-37. doi: 10.1007/s00467-013-2636-z. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
PMID: 24146299BACKGROUNDAoyagi J, Odaka J, Kuroiwa Y, Nakashima N, Ito T, Saito T, Kanai T, Yamagata T, Momoi MY. Utility of non-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to detect acute pyelonephritis. Pediatr Int. 2014 Jun;56(3):e4-6. doi: 10.1111/ped.12312.
PMID: 24894941BACKGROUNDVerswijvel G, Vandecaveye V, Gelin G, Vandevenne J, Grieten M, Horvath M, Oyen R, Palmers Y. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the evaluation of renal infection: preliminary results. JBR-BTR. 2002 Apr-May;85(2):100-3.
PMID: 12083620BACKGROUNDRathod SB, Kumbhar SS, Nanivadekar A, Aman K. Role of diffusion-weighted MRI in acute pyelonephritis: a prospective study. Acta Radiol. 2015 Feb;56(2):244-9. doi: 10.1177/0284185114520862. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
PMID: 24443116BACKGROUNDDe Pascale A, Piccoli GB, Priola SM, Rognone D, Consiglio V, Garetto I, Rizzo L, Veltri A. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: new perspectives in the diagnostic pathway of non-complicated acute pyelonephritis. Eur Radiol. 2013 Nov;23(11):3077-86. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2906-y. Epub 2013 Jun 8.
PMID: 23749224BACKGROUNDVivier PH, Sallem A, Beurdeley M, Lim RP, Leroux J, Caudron J, Coudray C, Liard A, Michelet I, Dacher JN. MRI and suspected acute pyelonephritis in children: comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging with gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted imaging. Eur Radiol. 2014 Jan;24(1):19-25. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2971-2. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
PMID: 23884301BACKGROUNDChan YL, Chan KW, Yeung CK, Roebuck DJ, Chu WC, Lee KH, Metreweli C. Potential utility of MRI in the evaluation of children at risk of renal scarring. Pediatr Radiol. 1999 Nov;29(11):856-62. doi: 10.1007/s002470050713.
PMID: 10552069BACKGROUNDKavanagh EC, Ryan S, Awan A, McCourbrey S, O'Connor R, Donoghue V. Can MRI replace DMSA in the detection of renal parenchymal defects in children with urinary tract infections? Pediatr Radiol. 2005 Mar;35(3):275-81. doi: 10.1007/s00247-004-1335-0. Epub 2004 Oct 14.
PMID: 15490148BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shannon Cannon, MD
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 20, 2019
First Posted
May 22, 2019
Study Start
May 7, 2019
Primary Completion
January 1, 2025
Study Completion
January 1, 2025
Last Updated
April 3, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share