Cognitive Reappraisal in Adolescents With Major Depression
KONNI
1 other identifier
interventional
71
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Major depression (MD) is common during adolescence and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. One important factor for the development and maintenance of adolescent MD are disturbances in emotion regulation, including deficits in cognitive reappraisal (CR). CR is a particularly effective emotion regulation strategy that aims at reinterpreting emotional events to modify affective responses. Adolescents with MD apply this strategy less often than their healthy peers and show disturbances in brain activation patterns underlying CR. In this study, MD adolescents will be randomly assigned to a group that receives a task-based training in CR or to a control training group. It will be examined whether the task-based CR training is superior to the control training with regard to improvements in negative affect, perceived stress in daily life and depressive symptoms. Moreover, during the four training sessions, the event-related potential "Late Positive Potential" (LPP) will be recorded to assess neurophysiological indices of CR processes and gaze fixations on emotional areas within negative pictures and affective responses to pictures will be collected to identify mechanisms underlying training effects.This study will provide first evidence for the efficacy of a short-time training that has previously shown to be effective in healthy individuals. Moreover, the study will identify neurobiological mechanisms that predict training effects. The results of this investigation will lay the ground for a clinical trial to investigate whether a CR training added to an established intervention improves treatment effects for adolescent MD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable major-depressive-disorder
Started May 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 3, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 21, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 27, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 22, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 22, 2021
CompletedAugust 23, 2022
August 1, 2022
2.5 years
May 3, 2019
August 22, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change in negative and positive affect via the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule for Children-Short Form (PANAS-C-SF)
A change in negative affect will be assessed based on the Negative Affect scale of the PANAS-C-SF. This scale ranges from one to five, with higher scores indicating more negative affect. A change in positive affect will be assessed based on the Positive Affect scale of the PANAS-C-SF. This scale ranges from one to five, with higher scores indicating more positive affect.
Over the course of the four training sessions, which will take place within the time frame of two weeks. This outcome measure will be reassessed at follow-up (2 weeks after the end of the entire training).
Change in perceived stress via the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10)
Change in perceived stress will be assessed based on the German adaption of the PSS-10. This scale ranges from 1-5, with higher scores indicating more perceived stress.
During each of the four training sessions, which will take place within the time frame of two weeks. This outcome measure will be reassessed at follow-up (two weeks after the end of the training sessions).
Change in rumination as assessed via the German adaptation of the Response Style Questionnaire (RSQ-D)
Change in rumination will be assessed based on two separate rumination subscales of the RSQ-D. The self-focused rumination scale ranges from 7-28, with higher scores indicating higher self-focused rumination. The symptom-focused rumination scale ranges from 8-31, with higher scores indicating higher symptom-focused rumination.
Pretraining & after completion of the last of four training session. The training sessions will take place within the time frame of two weeks. This outcome measure will be reassessed at follow-up (two weeks after the end of the training sessions).
Change in depressive Symptoms via the Beck Depression Inventory - Second Edition (BDI-II)
Change in depressive symptoms will be assessed based on the BDI-II. This scale ranges from 0-63, with higher scores indicated more depressive symptoms.
Pretraining & after completion of the last of four training session. The training sessions will take place within the time frame of two weeks.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Changes in the downregulation of affective behavioral responses to negative pictures via CR based on the self-assessment manikin scale
During each of the four training sessions, which will take place within the time frame of two weeks.
Changes in the downregulation of the LPP (late positive potential) to negative pictures via CR
During each of the four training sessions, which will take place within the time frame of two weeks.
Changes in the percent gaze fixations in emotional areas of interest within negative pictures
During each of the four training sessions, which will take place within the time frame of two weeks.
Study Arms (2)
Cognitive Reappraisal Training Group
EXPERIMENTALCognitive Reappraisal Training group will perform 4 training sessions in Cognitive Reappraisal during which, behavioral responses, event-related potentials (ERPs) and eye-tracking data are collected.
Control Training Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl Training Group will perform 4 control sessions without Cognitive Reappraisal Training during which behavioral responses, ERP and eye-tracking data are collected.
Interventions
The training procedure is adapted from a study by Denny \& Ochsner (2014). Before the task, participants are instructed that they will be presented pictures and that these pictures will be preceded by a condition specific cue signaling the appropriate strategy during picture viewing. Participants are instructed to indicate their affective response to the image on a rating scale. The task involves 4 conditions: 1) Negative-decrease: participants are asked to view negative pictures and to decrease their affective response by reappraising the negative event. 2) Negative-attend/ 3) Neutral-attend/ 4) Positive-attend: participants are asked to view pictures and to respond naturally to them without trying to alter their affective response. The training task will be repeated over 4 training sessions.
The task in the control group is implemented to account for unspecific effects and is as similar as possible to the CR task except that it involves no negative-decrease (i.e., no reappraisal) condition. Instead, the control task only involves the three attend conditions (negative- attend, neutral-attend, positive-attend).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female and male participants
- age range: 12-18 years
- current diagnosis of MD (ICD-10 diagnoses F32.0; F32.1; F32.2, F33.0, F33.1, F.33.2)
- intelligence quotient (IQ) of ≥ 80
You may not qualify if:
- neurological disorders
- schizophrenic disorder
- pervasive developmental disorder
- bipolar disorder
- borderline personality disorder
- substance dependence disorder
- gender dysphoria.
- Participants comorbid with psychiatric comorbidities other than those listed above are included if MD is the primary diagnosis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munichlead
- German Research Foundationcollaborator
- RWTH Aachen Universitycollaborator
- University of Amsterdamcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
Munich, Bavaria, 80336, Germany
Related Publications (4)
Denny BT, Ochsner KN. Behavioral effects of longitudinal training in cognitive reappraisal. Emotion. 2014 Apr;14(2):425-33. doi: 10.1037/a0035276. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
PMID: 24364856BACKGROUNDBradley MM, Lang PJ. Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;25(1):49-59. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9.
PMID: 7962581BACKGROUNDZsigo C, Feldmann L, Oort F, Piechaczek C, Bartling J, Schulte-Ruther M, Wachinger C, Schulte-Korne G, Greimel E. Emotion regulation training for adolescents with major depression: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Emotion. 2024 Jun;24(4):975-991. doi: 10.1037/emo0001328. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
PMID: 38060020DERIVEDGreimel E, Feldmann L, Piechaczek C, Oort F, Bartling J, Schulte-Ruther M, Schulte-Korne G. Study protocol for a randomised-controlled study on emotion regulation training for adolescents with major depression: the KONNI study. BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 10;10(9):e036093. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036093.
PMID: 32912977DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ellen Greimel, PhD
Department of Child&Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics&Psychoth.,LMU Munich
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participant-blind clinical trial: the participants are blinded regarding the allocation to the respective training group (CR training or control training). Upon completion of the training (including questionnaire assessment), participants are unblinded regarding the allocation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Postdoctoral Researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 3, 2019
First Posted
May 21, 2019
Study Start
May 27, 2019
Primary Completion
November 22, 2021
Study Completion
November 22, 2021
Last Updated
August 23, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data in our study contains sensitive patient information, such as sociodemographic information and comorbidities. Since patients could possibly be identified by making our raw data publicly available, ethical principles of protecting patient confidentiality would be breached. Aggregated group data can be made available upon request.