The Impact of a Technology-enabled Decision Aid, for Patients With Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis on Decision Quality, Level of Shared Decision-making, Patient Satisfaction and Magnitude of Limitations
A Technology-enabled Decision Aid for Patients With Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis
1 other identifier
interventional
145
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates a technology-enabled decision aid that provides evidence-based education (i.e. on understanding the condition, treatment options and comparisons, patient values and question \& answer quiz) and personalized, quantifiable benefit-risk ratio alongside the level of potential benefit in relation to joint stiffness, joint pain and quality of life. The study will be performed in the setting of an integrated care system providing patient-centered care for hip and knee osteoarthritis over the full cycle of care. The impact of a technology-enabled decision aid incorporating predictive analytics with machine learning capabilities on decision quality, activation, experience \& limitations of patients in this setting is relatively unknown.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 25, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 28, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 20, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2020
CompletedAugust 17, 2020
August 1, 2020
10 months
March 25, 2019
August 14, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Knee Osteoarthritis Decision Quality Instrument
Decision process subscore. Participants receive 1 point for a response of "yes" or "a lot/some." The total points are summed and then divided by the total number of items to result in scores from 0-100%, with higher scores indicated a more shared decision making process.
Day 1
Knee Osteoarthritis Decision Quality Instrument
Concordance subscore (A summary score (0-100%) indicating the percentage of patients who received treatment that matched their stated preference will be generated.)
Day 1
Secondary Outcomes (5)
CollaboRATE
Day 1
Numeric rating scale-satisfaction
Day 1
Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score, joint replacement (KOOS JR)
6 months after baseline visit
Undergoing joint replacement surgery or not
Day 1
Average time of patient visit and average time spent with provider
Day 1
Study Arms (2)
Experimental
EXPERIMENTALFull decision aid, consisting of education on osteoarthritis and treatment options, preferences and values elicitation, and personalized risk/benefit estimates based on patient's response to patient-reported outcome measures.
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATOREducation component of the decision aid only.
Interventions
Decision aid meant to improve shared decision making among patients and providers.
Investigator-written educational material and quiz to test knowledge of osteoarthritis and treatment options.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients with a presumptive diagnosis of knee OA aged between 45 and 89 (in-line with the decision aid algorithm)
- Radiographic evidence of moderate to severe osteoarthritis (Kellgren and Lawrence grade 3-4)
- KOOS Jr scores between 0-85 (in-line with the decision-aid algorithm)
- Participant able to give informed consent for participation in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Kellgren and Lawrence scale for classification of osteoarthritis grade 0-2
- Patients with a prior experience of total joint replacement
- Patient with experience with the pilot form of the decision aid
- Patients undergoing consideration for revision joint replacement
- Patients seeking care for trauma condition or psoriatic/rheumatoid arthritis
- Non-English or Non-Spanish speakers
- Patients with BMI below 20 or above 46 (in-line with the decision-aid algorithm)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UT Health Austin
Austin, Texas, 78712, United States
Related Publications (1)
Jayakumar P, Moore MG, Furlough KA, Uhler LM, Andrawis JP, Koenig KM, Aksan N, Rathouz PJ, Bozic KJ. Comparison of an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Patient Decision Aid vs Educational Material on Decision Quality, Shared Decision-Making, Patient Experience, and Functional Outcomes in Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037107. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37107.
PMID: 33599773DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kevin Bozic
University of Texas at Austin
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 25, 2019
First Posted
May 20, 2019
Study Start
March 28, 2019
Primary Completion
January 30, 2020
Study Completion
January 30, 2020
Last Updated
August 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share