Abdominal Compression Administered Early by the Colonoscopist During Water Exchange Colonoscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Loop formation is the most frequent cause of cecal intubation failure during colonoscopy. To reduce the loop formation, external abdominal pressure is widely used and proved to be helpful. Properly applied pressure can also decrease patients discomfort and shorten the cecal intubation time. The loop formation during water exchange is less severe as compared with during air insufflation and can be reduced quite readily. Traditionally an assistant is not asked to administer abdominal compression until the endoscopist has struggled for some time and failed to reduce the loops by withdrawal. The colonoscopist can administer the abdominal compression whenever the scope is not advancing smoothly, probably in the early stage of loop formation. We test the hypothesis that colonoscopist administered abdominal compression to remove loops in their early stage of formation hastens cecal intubation. A total of 120patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio (n=60 per group). When the tip of the scope doesn't advance or paradoxical movements occur, loop reduction by withdrawal of the scope will be implemented. If looping persists, abdominal compression will be applied. In the endoscopist-administered abdominal compression (endoscopist) group, the colonoscopist will apply the compression with his right hand and counter the pressure by pushing the back of the patient with his left forearm with the colonoscope in his left hand. The compression will be administered at left lower quadrant when the scope is in the sigmoid colon and at left lower quadrant and upper abdomen, respectively, when the scope tip reaches the transverse or ascending colon. If the formation of loop cannot be overcome, an assistant will apply the abdominal compression instead. In the assistant-administered abdominal compression (assistant) group, an endoscopic assistant will apply abdominal compression when a loop is formed. The assistant will apply the compression at the left lower quadrant initially, but quickly shift to other parts as needed depending on the tip location of colonoscope. If manual compressions fail, then the patients' position will be changed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 10, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 14, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 14, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 17, 2019
CompletedJune 29, 2021
June 1, 2021
1.2 years
June 10, 2017
June 28, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
cecal intubation time
the time when the colonoscope is inserted from the anus to the cecum.
through study completion, average 15 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (1)
proportion of patients requiring abdominal compression by an assistant
through study completion, average 15 minutes
Study Arms (2)
endoscopist group
EXPERIMENTALendoscopist-administered abdominal compression group
assistant group
ACTIVE COMPARATORassistant-administered abdominal compression group
Interventions
The endoscopist administers abdominal compression when loop formation encountered.
A assistant administers abdominal compression when loop formation encountered.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- In the Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan.
- Patients who undergo WE colonoscopy performed by the two endoscopists (YHH and CWT) at the endoscopic suite will be included.
You may not qualify if:
- Included patient declined to give consent,
- age \<20 years old,
- age \>80 years old,
- previous partial colectomy, not completely consumed bowel prep regimen, massive ascites, or known colonic obstruction, morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 35).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation
Chiayi City, Taiwan, 622, Taiwan
Related Publications (19)
Rex DK, Goodwine BW. Method of colonoscopy in 42 consecutive patients presenting after prior incomplete colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 May;97(5):1148-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05681.x.
PMID: 12014719BACKGROUNDShah SG, Brooker JC, Thapar C, Williams CB, Saunders BP. Patient pain during colonoscopy: an analysis using real-time magnetic endoscope imaging. Endoscopy. 2002 Jun;34(6):435-40. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-31995.
PMID: 12048623BACKGROUNDHerreros de Tejada A, Gimenez-Alvira L, Van den Brule E, Sanchez-Yuste R, Matallanos P, Blazquez E, Calleja JL, Abreu LE. Severe splenic rupture after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul 28;20(28):9618-20. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9618.
PMID: 25071360BACKGROUNDWaye JD, Yessayan SA, Lewis BS, Fabry TL. The technique of abdominal pressure in total colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 Mar-Apr;37(2):147-51. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70673-1.
PMID: 2032597BACKGROUNDChurch JM. Ancillary colonoscope insertion techniques. An evaluation. Surg Endosc. 1993 May-Jun;7(3):191-3. doi: 10.1007/BF00594106.
PMID: 8503077BACKGROUNDCatalano F, Catanzaro R, Branciforte G, Bentivegna CF, Cipolla R, Brogna A, Sala LO, Migliore G, Paternuosto M. Colonoscopy technique with an external straightener. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 May;51(5):600-4. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70301-4.
PMID: 10805853BACKGROUNDTsutsumi S, Fukushima H, Kuwano H. Colonoscopy using an abdominal bandage. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Oct-Nov;54(79):1983-4.
PMID: 18251143BACKGROUNDDechene A, Jochum C, Bechmann LP, Windeck S, Gerken G, Canbay A, Zopf T. Magnetic endoscopic imaging saves abdominal compression and patient pain in routine colonoscopies. J Dig Dis. 2011 Oct;12(5):364-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-2980.2011.00524.x.
PMID: 21955429BACKGROUNDHsieh YH, Tseng KC, Chou AL. Patient self-administered abdominal pressure to reduce loop formation during minimally sedated colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2010 May;55(5):1429-33. doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-0876-3. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
PMID: 19582577BACKGROUNDLeung FW, Amato A, Ell C, Friedland S, Harker JO, Hsieh YH, Leung JW, Mann SK, Paggi S, Pohl J, Radaelli F, Ramirez FC, Siao-Salera R, Terruzzi V. Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Sep;76(3):657-66. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.04.467.
PMID: 22898423BACKGROUNDHsieh YH, Koo M, Leung FW. A patient-blinded randomized, controlled trial comparing air insufflation, water immersion, and water exchange during minimally sedated colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep;109(9):1390-400. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.126. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
PMID: 24890443BACKGROUNDCadoni S, Sanna S, Gallittu P, Argiolas M, Fanari V, Porcedda ML, Erriu M, Leung FW. A randomized, controlled trial comparing real-time insertion pain during colonoscopy confirmed water exchange to be superior to water immersion in enhancing patient comfort. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):557-66. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.029. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
PMID: 25262100BACKGROUNDJia H, Pan Y, Guo X, Zhao L, Wang X, Zhang L, Dong T, Luo H, Ge Z, Liu J, Hao J, Yao P, Zhang Y, Ren H, Zhou W, Guo Y, Zhang W, Chen X, Sun D, Yang X, Kang X, Liu N, Liu Z, Leung F, Wu K, Fan D. Water Exchange Method Significantly Improves Adenoma Detection Rate: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr;112(4):568-576. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.501. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
PMID: 27922025BACKGROUNDHsieh YH, Tseng CW, Hu CT, Koo M, Leung FW. Prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy using water exchange, water immersion, and air insufflation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jul;86(1):192-201. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.005. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
PMID: 27988288BACKGROUNDRex DK. Water exchange vs. water immersion during colonoscope insertion. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep;109(9):1401-3. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.235.
PMID: 25196871BACKGROUNDLeung JW, Thai A, Yen A, Ward G, Abramyan O, Lee J, Smith B, Leung F. Magnetic endoscope imaging (ScopeGuide) elucidates the mechanism of action of the pain-alleviating impact of water exchange colonoscopy - attenuation of loop formation. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;2(3):142-146. doi: 10.4161/jig.23738. Epub 2012 Jul 1.
PMID: 23805397BACKGROUNDKudo Se, Lambert R, Allen JI, Fujii H, Fujii T, Kashida H, Matsuda T, Mori M, Saito H, Shimoda T, Tanaka S, Watanabe H, Sung JJ, Feld AD, Inadomi JM, O'Brien MJ, Lieberman DA, Ransohoff DF, Soetikno RM, Triadafilopoulos G, Zauber A, Teixeira CR, Rey JF, Jaramillo E, Rubio CA, Van Gossum A, Jung M, Vieth M, Jass JR, Hurlstone PD. Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Oct;68(4 Suppl):S3-47. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.07.052. No abstract available.
PMID: 18805238BACKGROUNDThe Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Dec;58(6 Suppl):S3-43. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02159-x. No abstract available.
PMID: 14652541BACKGROUNDLai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):620-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.057. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
PMID: 19136102BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yu-Hsi Hsieh, MD
Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief of Gastroenterology Endoscopy Suite
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 10, 2017
First Posted
May 17, 2019
Study Start
May 15, 2017
Primary Completion
August 14, 2018
Study Completion
August 14, 2018
Last Updated
June 29, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06