NCT03954561

Brief Summary

Loop formation is the most frequent cause of cecal intubation failure during colonoscopy. To reduce the loop formation, external abdominal pressure is widely used and proved to be helpful. Properly applied pressure can also decrease patients discomfort and shorten the cecal intubation time. The loop formation during water exchange is less severe as compared with during air insufflation and can be reduced quite readily. Traditionally an assistant is not asked to administer abdominal compression until the endoscopist has struggled for some time and failed to reduce the loops by withdrawal. The colonoscopist can administer the abdominal compression whenever the scope is not advancing smoothly, probably in the early stage of loop formation. We test the hypothesis that colonoscopist administered abdominal compression to remove loops in their early stage of formation hastens cecal intubation. A total of 120patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio (n=60 per group). When the tip of the scope doesn't advance or paradoxical movements occur, loop reduction by withdrawal of the scope will be implemented. If looping persists, abdominal compression will be applied. In the endoscopist-administered abdominal compression (endoscopist) group, the colonoscopist will apply the compression with his right hand and counter the pressure by pushing the back of the patient with his left forearm with the colonoscope in his left hand. The compression will be administered at left lower quadrant when the scope is in the sigmoid colon and at left lower quadrant and upper abdomen, respectively, when the scope tip reaches the transverse or ascending colon. If the formation of loop cannot be overcome, an assistant will apply the abdominal compression instead. In the assistant-administered abdominal compression (assistant) group, an endoscopic assistant will apply abdominal compression when a loop is formed. The assistant will apply the compression at the left lower quadrant initially, but quickly shift to other parts as needed depending on the tip location of colonoscope. If manual compressions fail, then the patients' position will be changed.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 15, 2017

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 10, 2017

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 14, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 14, 2018

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 17, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

June 29, 2021

Status Verified

June 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

June 10, 2017

Last Update Submit

June 28, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

colonoscopycecal intubation time

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • cecal intubation time

    the time when the colonoscope is inserted from the anus to the cecum.

    through study completion, average 15 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • proportion of patients requiring abdominal compression by an assistant

    through study completion, average 15 minutes

Study Arms (2)

endoscopist group

EXPERIMENTAL

endoscopist-administered abdominal compression group

Procedure: endoscopist-administered abdominal compression

assistant group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

assistant-administered abdominal compression group

Procedure: assistant-administered abdominal compression

Interventions

The endoscopist administers abdominal compression when loop formation encountered.

endoscopist group

A assistant administers abdominal compression when loop formation encountered.

assistant group

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • In the Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan.
  • Patients who undergo WE colonoscopy performed by the two endoscopists (YHH and CWT) at the endoscopic suite will be included.

You may not qualify if:

  • Included patient declined to give consent,
  • age \<20 years old,
  • age \>80 years old,
  • previous partial colectomy, not completely consumed bowel prep regimen, massive ascites, or known colonic obstruction, morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 35).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation

Chiayi City, Taiwan, 622, Taiwan

Location

Related Publications (19)

  • Rex DK, Goodwine BW. Method of colonoscopy in 42 consecutive patients presenting after prior incomplete colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 May;97(5):1148-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05681.x.

    PMID: 12014719BACKGROUND
  • Shah SG, Brooker JC, Thapar C, Williams CB, Saunders BP. Patient pain during colonoscopy: an analysis using real-time magnetic endoscope imaging. Endoscopy. 2002 Jun;34(6):435-40. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-31995.

    PMID: 12048623BACKGROUND
  • Herreros de Tejada A, Gimenez-Alvira L, Van den Brule E, Sanchez-Yuste R, Matallanos P, Blazquez E, Calleja JL, Abreu LE. Severe splenic rupture after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul 28;20(28):9618-20. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9618.

    PMID: 25071360BACKGROUND
  • Waye JD, Yessayan SA, Lewis BS, Fabry TL. The technique of abdominal pressure in total colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 Mar-Apr;37(2):147-51. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70673-1.

    PMID: 2032597BACKGROUND
  • Church JM. Ancillary colonoscope insertion techniques. An evaluation. Surg Endosc. 1993 May-Jun;7(3):191-3. doi: 10.1007/BF00594106.

    PMID: 8503077BACKGROUND
  • Catalano F, Catanzaro R, Branciforte G, Bentivegna CF, Cipolla R, Brogna A, Sala LO, Migliore G, Paternuosto M. Colonoscopy technique with an external straightener. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 May;51(5):600-4. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70301-4.

    PMID: 10805853BACKGROUND
  • Tsutsumi S, Fukushima H, Kuwano H. Colonoscopy using an abdominal bandage. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Oct-Nov;54(79):1983-4.

    PMID: 18251143BACKGROUND
  • Dechene A, Jochum C, Bechmann LP, Windeck S, Gerken G, Canbay A, Zopf T. Magnetic endoscopic imaging saves abdominal compression and patient pain in routine colonoscopies. J Dig Dis. 2011 Oct;12(5):364-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-2980.2011.00524.x.

    PMID: 21955429BACKGROUND
  • Hsieh YH, Tseng KC, Chou AL. Patient self-administered abdominal pressure to reduce loop formation during minimally sedated colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2010 May;55(5):1429-33. doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-0876-3. Epub 2009 Jul 7.

    PMID: 19582577BACKGROUND
  • Leung FW, Amato A, Ell C, Friedland S, Harker JO, Hsieh YH, Leung JW, Mann SK, Paggi S, Pohl J, Radaelli F, Ramirez FC, Siao-Salera R, Terruzzi V. Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Sep;76(3):657-66. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.04.467.

    PMID: 22898423BACKGROUND
  • Hsieh YH, Koo M, Leung FW. A patient-blinded randomized, controlled trial comparing air insufflation, water immersion, and water exchange during minimally sedated colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep;109(9):1390-400. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.126. Epub 2014 Jun 3.

    PMID: 24890443BACKGROUND
  • Cadoni S, Sanna S, Gallittu P, Argiolas M, Fanari V, Porcedda ML, Erriu M, Leung FW. A randomized, controlled trial comparing real-time insertion pain during colonoscopy confirmed water exchange to be superior to water immersion in enhancing patient comfort. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):557-66. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.029. Epub 2014 Sep 26.

    PMID: 25262100BACKGROUND
  • Jia H, Pan Y, Guo X, Zhao L, Wang X, Zhang L, Dong T, Luo H, Ge Z, Liu J, Hao J, Yao P, Zhang Y, Ren H, Zhou W, Guo Y, Zhang W, Chen X, Sun D, Yang X, Kang X, Liu N, Liu Z, Leung F, Wu K, Fan D. Water Exchange Method Significantly Improves Adenoma Detection Rate: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr;112(4):568-576. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.501. Epub 2016 Dec 6.

    PMID: 27922025BACKGROUND
  • Hsieh YH, Tseng CW, Hu CT, Koo M, Leung FW. Prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy using water exchange, water immersion, and air insufflation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jul;86(1):192-201. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.005. Epub 2016 Dec 15.

    PMID: 27988288BACKGROUND
  • Rex DK. Water exchange vs. water immersion during colonoscope insertion. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep;109(9):1401-3. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.235.

    PMID: 25196871BACKGROUND
  • Leung JW, Thai A, Yen A, Ward G, Abramyan O, Lee J, Smith B, Leung F. Magnetic endoscope imaging (ScopeGuide) elucidates the mechanism of action of the pain-alleviating impact of water exchange colonoscopy - attenuation of loop formation. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;2(3):142-146. doi: 10.4161/jig.23738. Epub 2012 Jul 1.

    PMID: 23805397BACKGROUND
  • Kudo Se, Lambert R, Allen JI, Fujii H, Fujii T, Kashida H, Matsuda T, Mori M, Saito H, Shimoda T, Tanaka S, Watanabe H, Sung JJ, Feld AD, Inadomi JM, O'Brien MJ, Lieberman DA, Ransohoff DF, Soetikno RM, Triadafilopoulos G, Zauber A, Teixeira CR, Rey JF, Jaramillo E, Rubio CA, Van Gossum A, Jung M, Vieth M, Jass JR, Hurlstone PD. Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Oct;68(4 Suppl):S3-47. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.07.052. No abstract available.

    PMID: 18805238BACKGROUND
  • The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Dec;58(6 Suppl):S3-43. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02159-x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 14652541BACKGROUND
  • Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):620-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.057. Epub 2009 Jan 10.

    PMID: 19136102BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colonic Polyps

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal PolypsPolypsPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Yu-Hsi Hsieh, MD

    Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chief of Gastroenterology Endoscopy Suite

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2017

First Posted

May 17, 2019

Study Start

May 15, 2017

Primary Completion

August 14, 2018

Study Completion

August 14, 2018

Last Updated

June 29, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-06

Locations