Impact of BC Farmers' Market Nutrition Coupon Program on Diet Quality and Psychosocial Well-being of Low-income Adults
Impact of a Farmers' Market Nutrition Coupon Program on Diet Quality and Psychosocial Well-being Among Low-income Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
285
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The British Columbia (BC) Farmers' Market Nutrition Coupon Program (FMNCP) provides low-income households with $21/week in coupons to purchase healthy foods at farmers' markets and supportive nutrition skill-building activities. This randomized controlled trial will assess the impact of the BC FMNCP on the overall diet quality (primary outcome), diet quality subscores, mental well-being, sense of community, experiences of food insecurity, risk of malnutrition (secondary outcomes) and subjective social status (exploratory outcome) of low-income adults immediately post-intervention and 16 weeks post-intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 10, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 16, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 3, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 16, 2024
CompletedDecember 16, 2024
June 1, 2020
10 months
May 10, 2019
January 22, 2024
October 30, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Difference Between Intervention and Control Groups in Mean Overall Diet Quality by Healthy Eating Index-2015 Scores Immediately Post-intervention (10-15 Weeks)
Difference between intervention and control groups in mean overall diet quality by Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores immediately post-intervention (10-15 weeks). Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores are calculated from 24-hour dietary recalls and can range from 0-100, with a higher score indicating higher diet quality.
post-intervention (10-15 weeks).
Difference Between Intervention and Control Groups in Mean Overall Diet Quality by Healthy Eating Index-2015 Scores at 16 Weeks Post-intervention (26-31 Weeks)
Difference between intervention and control groups in mean overall diet quality by Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores at 16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks). Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores are calculated from 24-hour dietary recalls and can range from 0-100, with a higher score indicating higher diet quality.
16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks).
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Difference Between Intervention and Control Groups in Mean Mental Well-being Scores by Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale Immediately Post-intervention (10-15 Weeks)
post-intervention (10-15 weeks).
Difference Between Intervention and Control Groups in Mean Mental Well-being Scores by Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale at 16 Weeks Post-intervention (26-31 Weeks)
16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks).
Difference Between Intervention and Control Groups in Mean Sense of Community by the Brief Sense of Community Scale Immediately Post-intervention (10-15 Weeks)
post-intervention (10-15 weeks).
Difference Between Intervention and Control Groups in Mean Sense of Community by the Brief Sense of Community Scale at 16 Weeks Post-intervention (26-31 Weeks)
16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks).
Difference Between Intervention and Control Groups in the Odds of Experiencing Household Food Insecurity Immediately Post-intervention (10-15 Weeks)
post-intervention (10-15 weeks).
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (12)
Difference Between Intervention and Control Groups in Mean Subjective Social Status by the MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status Community Ladder Immediately Post-intervention (10-15 Weeks)
post-intervention (10-15 weeks).
Difference Between Intervention and Control Groups in Mean Subjective Social Status by the MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status Community Ladder at 16 Weeks Post-intervention (26-31 Weeks)
16 weeks post-intervention (26-31 weeks)
Subgroup Analysis for Impact of Intervention on Overall Diet Quality (Assessed by Healthy Eating Index-2015) by Sex Immediately Post-intervention (10-15 Weeks)
post-intervention (10-15 weeks)
- +9 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Nutrition Coupons
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in the FMNCP group will receive 16 coupon sheets (each sheet contains $21 in coupons) over 10-15 weeks (households with 5-8 individuals will receive 32 coupon sheets) to purchase fruits, vegetables, dairy, meat/poultry/fish, eggs, nuts, and cut herbs at participating BC farmers' markets. To ensure participants receive all 16 coupon sheets, community partners will provide two coupon sheets per household during the first 1-6 weeks of the intervention. Participants in the FMNCP group will also be invited to participate in nutrition skill-building activities (e.g., cooking classes) offered by community partners throughout the intervention period, however participation is not required (this is consistent with the existing FMNCP).
Control
NO INTERVENTIONNo intervention provided. Participants will be eligible to participate in the BC Farmers' Market Nutrition Coupon Program during the next farmers' market season (i.e. one year following the current intervention).
Interventions
Participants will receive 16 coupon sheets (each sheet contains $21 in coupons) over 10-15 weeks (households with 5-8 individuals will receive 32 coupon sheets) to purchase fruits, vegetables, dairy, meat/poultry/fish, eggs, nuts, and cut herbs at participating BC farmers' markets.
Participants will be invited to participate in nutrition skill-building activities throughout the intervention period. To be consistent with the real-world program, the frequency and types of skill-building activities offered will vary by community partner, and participation is not required.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Community Partners
Rural and Urban, British Columbia, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Aktary ML, Dunn S, Sajobi T, O'Hara H, Leblanc P, McCormack GR, Caron-Roy S, Ball K, Lee YY, Nejatinamini S, Reimer RA, Pan B, Minaker LM, Raine KD, Godley J, Downs S, Nykiforuk CI, Olstad DL. Impact of a farmers' market healthy food subsidy on the diet quality of adults with low incomes in British Columbia, Canada: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2023 Apr;117(4):766-776. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.01.017. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
PMID: 36804420DERIVEDAktary ML, Caron-Roy S, Sajobi T, O'Hara H, Leblanc P, Dunn S, McCormack GR, Timmins D, Ball K, Downs S, Minaker LM, Nykiforuk CI, Godley J, Milaney K, Lashewicz B, Fournier B, Elliott C, Raine KD, Prowse RJ, Olstad DL. Impact of a farmers' market nutrition coupon programme on diet quality and psychosocial well-being among low-income adults: protocol for a randomised controlled trial and a longitudinal qualitative investigation. BMJ Open. 2020 May 5;10(5):e035143. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035143.
PMID: 32371514DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Dietary intake data were self-reported and may be affected by misreporting; Data were obtained only from the primary food shopper in the household; Insufficient data to examine participant-specific coupon distribution and redemption; This study was powered to detect a change in diet quality (the primary outcome) and may have been underpowered to detect changes in the secondary and exploratory outcomes.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Dana Lee Olstad
- Organization
- University of Calgary
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dana Olstad, PhD, RD
University of Calgary
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Investigators will be blinded to group allocation if participants elect to complete data collection by telephone. Participants cannot be blinded to group assignment but will be blinded to the study objectives.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 10, 2019
First Posted
May 16, 2019
Study Start
June 3, 2019
Primary Completion
March 31, 2020
Study Completion
March 31, 2020
Last Updated
December 16, 2024
Results First Posted
December 16, 2024
Record last verified: 2020-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share