Platelet-Rich Plasma vs. Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor vs. Placebo and Outcomes in Frozen Embryo Transfer
The Impact of Using Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Versus Placebo on the Outcomes of Frozen Embryo Transfer: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
665
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the impact of using Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) vs. Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (GCSF) vs. placebo on the outcomes of frozen embryo transfer (FET) in terms of clinical pregnancy rates. It will also assess their effect on chemical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, delivery outcomes, and endometrial parameters. The main questions it aims to answer are: Do the clinical pregnancy rates differ upon using PRP vs. GCSF vs. placebo during FET? What are the effects of PRP vs. GCSF vs. placebo during FET on chemical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, delivery outcomes, and endometrial parameters? Researchers will compare the effect of administration of PRP vs. GCSF vs. placebo during FET on pregnancy outcomes. Participants will be randomized to receive the study intervention seven days before embryo transfer: 1.0 ml of either PRP (prepared in-house), GCSF (Filgrastim, 300 mcg/1.0 mL), or 0.9% saline (placebo). The intervention will be administered by slow infusion into the uterine cavity with an intrauterine insemination catheter.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Jun 2019
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 8, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 10, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 8, 2023
CompletedAugust 7, 2025
July 1, 2025
2.8 years
May 8, 2019
August 2, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The clinical pregnancy rate
Definition: The presence of fetal heartbeats in transvaginal ultrasound after 6 to 8 weeks of embryo transfer in all groups. Unit of Measure: The percentage of participants who will achieve a clinical pregnancy among those who underwent the embryo transfer, calculated by dividing the number of participants who will have a clinical pregnancy by the total number of participants who underwent embryo transfer and multiplying by 100.
6 to 8 weeks of embryo transfer
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Chemical pregnancy rate
2 weeks post embryo transfer
Miscarriage rate
20 weeks of gestation
Live-birth rate
The live birth rate is assessed at the time of birth, including both full-term and preterm live births.
Implantation rate
Between 3 and 5 weeks after embryo transfer.
Endometrial Thickness
The changes in endometrial parameters between the intervention cycle and the natural cycle will be measured during the mid-luteal phase (during 18-23 days of the cycle).
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor Arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORWomen in this group will receive GCSF with conventional hormonal therapy: Estradiol valerate 6mg/day from day 2 of menstrual cycle Vaginal sildenafil citrate 25mg / 6 hours Then frozen embryo transfer will be performed.
Platelet Rich Plasma Arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORWomen in this group will receive PRP with conventional hormonal therapy: Estradiol valerate 6mg/day from day 2 of menstrual cycle Vaginal sildenafil citrate 25mg / 6 hours Then frozen embryo transfer will be performed.
Saline
PLACEBO COMPARATORWomen in this group will receive saline with conventional hormonal therapy: Estradiol valerate 6mg/day from day 2 of menstrual cycle Vaginal sildenafil citrate 25mg / 6 hours Then frozen embryo transfer will be performed.
Interventions
Filgrastim, Amgen, California, USA 300 mg/1.0 mL
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All women aged 20-40 years
- Non-smoker
- BMI \< 30
- Normal endometrial cavity confirmed by hysteroscopy and ultrasound
- Visiting the center for IVF by FET during the period of the study
You may not qualify if:
- History of anti-phospholipid syndrome confirmed by serological tests.
- History of any hematological and immunological disorders
- History of chromosomal or genetic abnormalities in the patient or in the family
- Any uterine abnormalities (congenital or acquired)
- Previous uterine surgeries except caesarean section
- Hypersensitivity to G-CSF
- Uncontrolled systemic disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Wael Elbanna Cliniclead
- National Research Centre, Egyptcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hayat center
Maadi, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
Related Publications (4)
Mehrafza M, Kabodmehri R, Nikpouri Z, Pourseify G, Raoufi A, Eftekhari A, Samadnia S, Hosseini A. Comparing the Impact of Autologous Platelet-rich Plasma and Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor on Pregnancy Outcome in Patients with Repeated Implantation Failure. J Reprod Infertil. 2019 Jan-Mar;20(1):35-41.
PMID: 30859080BACKGROUNDCoughlan C, Ledger W, Wang Q, Liu F, Demirol A, Gurgan T, Cutting R, Ong K, Sallam H, Li TC. Recurrent implantation failure: definition and management. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Jan;28(1):14-38. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.08.011. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
PMID: 24269084BACKGROUNDRinehart J. Recurrent implantation failure: definition. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007 Jul;24(7):284-7. doi: 10.1007/s10815-007-9147-4. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
PMID: 17674185BACKGROUNDChang Y, Li J, Chen Y, Wei L, Yang X, Shi Y, Liang X. Autologous platelet-rich plasma promotes endometrial growth and improves pregnancy outcome during in vitro fertilization. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Jan 15;8(1):1286-90. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 25785127BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wael SS Elbanna, Consultant
Wael Elbanna Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2019
First Posted
May 10, 2019
Study Start
June 1, 2019
Primary Completion
March 31, 2022
Study Completion
March 8, 2023
Last Updated
August 7, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share