A Study of Imlifidase in Patients With Guillain-Barré Syndrome
An Open-label, Single Arm, Multi-centre, Phase II Study Investigating Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Imlifidase in Patients With Guillain-Barré Syndrome, in Comparison With Matched Control Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
30
3 countries
11
Brief Summary
The study participants are patients which have been diagnosed with Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) and are planned to receive treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). IVIg is a standard of care treatment for GBS patients. The patients in this study will be treated with the study medicine imlifidase on day 1, and with IVIg on days 3-7. The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety and effectiveness of imlifidase in patients diagnosed with GBS.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Nov 2019
Typical duration for phase_2
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 30, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 9, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 12, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 27, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 27, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 9, 2025
CompletedApril 9, 2025
March 1, 2025
4.3 years
April 30, 2019
February 25, 2025
March 21, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Guillain Barré Syndrome Disability Score (GBS DS) - Time to Improve by at Least 1 Grade
Efficacy is assessed as proportion of subjects with improvement of one (1) or more grades in disability outcome on the 6-point GBS DS over time. The 6-point Guillain Barré Syndrome disability score (GBS DS) is a widely accepted and easily obtainable scoring system used to assess disability status of GBS subjects. The DS score is as follows: 0=Healthy, 1=Minor symptoms and capable of running (subjects must be asked to run), 2=Able to walk independently 10 meters or more but unable to run, 3=Able to walk more than 10 meters across an open space with help, 4=Bedridden or chair bound, 5=Needing mechanical ventilation, 6=Dead
Baseline to Day 360
Guillain Barré Syndrome Disability Score (GBS DS) - Time to Improve by at Least 2 Grades
Efficacy is assessed as proportion of subjects with improvement of one (1) or more grades in disability outcome on the 6-point GBS DS over time. The 6-point Guillain Barré Syndrome disability score (GBS DS) is a widely accepted and easily obtainable scoring system used to assess disability status of GBS subjects. The DS score is as follows: 0=Healthy, 1=Minor symptoms and capable of running (subjects must be asked to run), 2=Able to walk independently 10 meters or more but unable to run, 3=Able to walk more than 10 meters across an open space with help, 4=Bedridden or chair bound, 5=Needing mechanical ventilation, 6=Dead
Baseline to Day 360
Guillain Barré Syndrome Disability Score (GBS DS) - Ability to Walk Unaided
Efficacy is assessed as proportion of subjects able to walk unaided (i.e. GBS DS=2) over time
Baseline to Day 360
Proportion of Patients Who Are Able to Run Over Time (GBS DS≤1)
Efficacy is assessed as proportion of patients able to run (i.e. Guillain Barré Syndrome disability score \[GBS DS\] ≤1) over time
Baseline to Day 360
Mean MRC Sum Score Over Time
Efficacy is assessed as Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score over time. The MRC sum score is widely used to assess the motor impairment in subjects with peripheral neuropathies. It is a sum score of power in 6 muscle groups on each side (abduction of arm, flexion of forearm, extension of the wrist, hip flexion, and extension of knee and dorsal flexion of the foot). The sum of these scores ranges from 0 (total paralysis) to 60 (normal power). It provides valuable information about the muscle strength. Change in MRC sum score helps in identification of GBS patients with treatment related fluctuation or exacerbation. The individual MRC grades are defined as follows: 0=No visible contraction,1=Visible contraction without movement of the limb, 2=Movement of the limb but not against gravity, 3=Movement against gravity (almost full range), 4=Movement against gravity and resistance, 5=Normal
Baseline until Day 180
Change From Baseline in MRC Sum Score Over Time
Efficacy is assessed as change in Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score. The MRC sum score is widely used to assess the motor impairment in subjects with peripheral neuropathies. It is a sum score of power in 6 muscle groups on each side (abduction of arm, flexion of forearm, extension of the wrist, hip flexion, and extension of knee and dorsal flexion of the foot). The sum of these scores ranges from 0 (total paralysis) to 60 (normal power). It provides valuable information about the muscle strength. Change in MRC sum score helps in identification of GBS patients with treatment related fluctuation or exacerbation. The individual MRC grades are defined as follows: 0=No visible contraction,1=Visible contraction without movement of the limb, 2=Movement of the limb but not against gravity, 3=Movement against gravity (almost full range), 4=Movement against gravity and resistance, 5=Normal
Baseline until Day 180
Mean R-ODS Over Time
The patients have rated their ability to perform different common activities using the Rasch-built overall disability score (R-ODS) questionnaire. R-ODS is a linearly weighted disease specific scale, which captures activities and social participation limitation in patients with immune-mediated neuropathies, including GBS. The questionnaire comprises 24 items ranging from ability to read a book or newspaper (as the easiest item to accomplish) to ability to run (most difficult item to accomplish). The response options for each item are: 0=Not possible, 1=Possible with effort, 2=Easy to perform. The obtained raw summed score is subsequently translated to a centile metric ranging from 0 (most severe disability) to 100 (no disability at all).
Baseline to Day 360
Change From Baseline in R-ODS Over Time
The patients have rated their ability to perform different common activities using the Rasch-built overall disability score (R-ODS) questionnaire. R-ODS is a linearly weighted disease specific scale, which captures activities and social participation limitation in patients with immune-mediated neuropathies, including GBS. The questionnaire comprises 24 items ranging from ability to read a book or newspaper (as the easiest item to accomplish) to ability to run (most difficult item to accomplish). The response options for each item are: 0=Not possible, 1=Possible with effort, 2=Easy to perform. The obtained raw summed score is subsequently translated to a centile metric ranging from 0 (most severe disability) to 100 (no disability at all).
Baseline to Day 360
Days in Hospital
The number of days the patients were admitted to hospital
Baseline to Day 360
Time in an ICU
Efficacy is assessed as time in an intensive care unit (ICU)
Baseline until Day 360
Need for Mechanical Ventilation
Baseline until Day 180
Patient's Health State Over Time as Assessed by EQ VAS
Quality of Life will be assessed using the EurQol group's EurQol - 5 dimension (EQ-5D) Health questionnaire. The EQ-5D consists of 2 parts: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical scale, where score 100 is 'The best health you can imagine' and score 0 is the 'The worst health you can imagine'.
Day 8, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 92, Day 180, and Day 360
Secondary Outcomes (8)
PK Profile of Imlifidase: Cmax
Within 2 hours before imlifidase dose until Day 15
PK Profile of Imlifidase: Tmax
Within 2 hours before imlifidase dose until Day 15
PK Profile of Imlifidase: AUC
Within 2 hours before imlifidase dose until Day 15
PK Profile of Imlifidase: t1/2
Within 2 hours before imlifidase dose until Day 15
PK Profile of Imlifidase: CL
Within 2 hours before imlifidase dose until Day 15
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Imlifidase
EXPERIMENTALOne (1) dose of imlifidase, 0.25 mg/kg, will be administered IV over 30 minutes, Day 1. IVIg, 0.4 g/kg, will be administered for 5 consecutive Days, starting on Day 3 at least 48 h after imlifidase administration.
Interventions
All subjects will receive imlifidase (Day 1) prior to standard care IVIg
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed Informed Consent obtained before any study-related procedures.
- Willingness and ability to comply with the protocol.
- Male or female aged ≥18 years at the time of screening.
- GBS diagnosed according to National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) diagnostic criteria (Asbury et al. 1990).
- Onset of weakness due to GBS is not more than 10 days prior to screening.
- Unable to walk unaided for \>10 meters (grade ≥ 3 on GBS DS).
- IVIg treatment being considered.
- Women of child-bearing potential willing or able to use at least one highly effective contraceptive method from the day of treatment until at least 6 months after the dose of imlifidase if not abstinent. In the context of this study, an effective method is defined as those which result in low failure rate (i.e. less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly.
- Men willing to use double-barrier contraception from the day of treatment until at least 2 months after the dose of imlifidase if not abstinent.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous treatment with imlifidase.
- Previous IVIg treatment within 28 days prior to imlifidase treatment.
- Subjects who are being considered for, or already on, PE.
- Women of child-bearing potential willing or able to use at least one highly effective contraceptive method from the screening visit until at least 180 days following imlifidase dosing.
- Breastfeeding or pregnancy
- Clinical evidence of a polyneuropathy of another cause e.g. diabetes mellitus (except mild sensory), alcoholism, vitamin deficiency, or porphyria.
- Known selective immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency.
- Hypersensitivity to IVIg or to any of the excipients.
- Immunosuppressive treatment (e.g. azathioprine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, sirolimus or \> 20 mg prednisolone daily) during the last month.
- Subject known to have a severe concurrent disease, e.g. malignancy, severe cardiovascular disease and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
- Any condition that in the opinion of the investigator could increase the subject's risk by participating in the study or confound the outcome of the study.
- Known mental incapacity or language barriers precluding adequate understanding of the Informed Consent information and the study activities.
- Subjects with clinical signs of ongoing infection.
- Subjects should not have received other investigational drugs within 5 half-lives prior to imlifidase dosing.
- Present or history of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), or known familial history of TTP.
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (11)
CHU Le Kremlin-Bicêtre. Service Neurologie
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Paris, 94270, France
CHU Bordeaux - Hôpital Pellegrin Tripode
Bordeaux, 33076, France
CHU de Limoges - Hôpital Dupuytren
Limoges, 87000, France
Hôpital de la Timone - Centre de référence des maladies neuromusculaires et de la SLA
Marseille, 13385, France
CHU de Montpellier, Hôpital Gui de Chauliac
Montpellier, 34295, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes
Nantes, 44093, France
Service de neurologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg
Strasbourg, 67 098, France
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Erasmus Medical Centre
Rotterdam, 3015 GD, Netherlands
Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Glasgow
Glasgow, United Kingdom
Oxford University Hospital
Oxford, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Vice President Research and Development
- Organization
- Hansa Biopharma AB
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Clinical Operations
Hansa Biopharma AB
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 30, 2019
First Posted
May 9, 2019
Study Start
November 12, 2019
Primary Completion
February 27, 2024
Study Completion
February 27, 2024
Last Updated
April 9, 2025
Results First Posted
April 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share