Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of Kidney Stones Greater Than 2 cm
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With Coaxial Dilatation vs Pneumatic Balloon for Treatment of Kidney Stones Greater Than 2 cm
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a minimally invasive procedure considered as the treatment of choice for the management of large-scale and fully-formed kidney stones.This procedure has a 5% risk of complications including bleeding, the lesion of the collecting system, the risk of urinary infection and bacteremia. New surgical tools such as dilatation of the nephrostomy tract with mechanical dilatation contribute to the reduction of these risks, together with an improvement in the operative times and a lower rate of complications. At present there are multiple scales measuring the lithiasic morphology (Guy, the STONE nephrolitometry score system and the nomogram of the Office of Clinical Investigation of the Endourology Society - CROES) which allow to evaluate the degree of complexity of the stone, the possibility of residual stones and the risk of complications. These tools allow us to do a better analysis of the risk factors of the patient who will be taken to this type of endoscopic procedure in order to decrease morbidity and complication rates. Hypothesis: The use of pneumatic dilators during percutaneous nephrolithotomy reduces the rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications, which would have an impact on hospitalization times and surgical success for the management of renal stone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 8, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 10, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 16, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2017
CompletedJune 16, 2017
June 1, 2017
4 months
May 8, 2017
June 14, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications that occur with the use of pneumatic dilation and with traditional coaxial dilatation.
To determine the highest rate of intraoperative and early postoperative complications with the use of various methods of access to the renal collecting system during percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones greater than 2 cm.
8 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with Coaxial Dilatation
ACTIVE COMPARATORPercutaneous nephrolithotomy with Coaxial Dilatation for treatment of kidney stones greater than 2 cm.
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with Pneumatic Balloon
PLACEBO COMPARATORPercutaneous nephrolithotomy with Pneumatic Balloon for treatment of kidney stones greater than 2 cm.
Interventions
Use of various methods of access to the renal collecting system (pneumatic balloon dilatation vs. traditional technique with coaxial dilators) during percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of kidney stones greater than 2 cm.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient over 18 years old
- Non-staghorn kidney stones greater than 2 cm
You may not qualify if:
- Coagulopathies
- Solitary Functioning Kidney
- Pyonephrosis
- Pregnancy
- Urinary tract infection
- Cardiopulmonary Restrictions Limiting Prone Position
- BMI greater than 35
- More of 2 puncture of the excretory tract
- STONE score equal or greater than 12
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Universitario Los Comuneros
Bucaramanga, Colombia
Related Publications (10)
Lopes T, Sangam K, Alken P, Barroilhet BS, Saussine C, Shi L, de la Rosette J; Clinical Research Office of The Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Study Group. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: tract dilation comparisons in 5537 patients. J Endourol. 2011 May;25(5):755-62. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0488. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
PMID: 21388242BACKGROUNDGOODWIN WE, CASEY WC, WOOLF W. Percutaneous trocar (needle) nephrostomy in hydronephrosis. J Am Med Assoc. 1955 Mar 12;157(11):891-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.1955.02950280015005. No abstract available.
PMID: 13233046RESULTFernstrom I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1976;10(3):257-9. doi: 10.1080/21681805.1976.11882084.
PMID: 1006190RESULTBeiko D, Elkoushy MA, Kokorovic A, Roberts G, Robb S, Andonian S. Ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what is the rate of readmission? J Endourol. 2015 Apr;29(4):410-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0584. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
PMID: 25221917RESULTTailly T, Razvi H. The S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring system: How valid is it? Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 May-Jun;9(5-6):196. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.3020. No abstract available.
PMID: 26225169RESULTThomas K, Smith NC, Hegarty N, Glass JM. The Guy's stone score--grading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures. Urology. 2011 Aug;78(2):277-81. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.12.026. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
PMID: 21333334RESULTAkhavein A, Henriksen C, Syed J, Bird VG. Prediction of single procedure success rate using S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry surgical classification system with strict criteria for surgical outcome. Urology. 2015 Jan;85(1):69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.09.010.
PMID: 25530366RESULTOkhunov Z, Friedlander JI, George AK, Duty BD, Moreira DM, Srinivasan AK, Hillelsohn J, Smith AD, Okeke Z. S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry: novel surgical classification system for kidney calculi. Urology. 2013 Jun;81(6):1154-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.083. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
PMID: 23540858RESULTShahrour W, Andonian S. Ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy: initial series. Urology. 2010 Dec;76(6):1288-92. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.08.001.
PMID: 21130245RESULTBeiko D, Lee L. Outpatient tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the initial case series. Can Urol Assoc J. 2010 Aug;4(4):E86-90. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.886.
PMID: 20694090RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carlos E Hernandez, MD
HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LOS COMUNEROS
- STUDY CHAIR
Andres Gutierrez, MD
HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LOS COMUNEROS
- STUDY CHAIR
Jose G Ramos, MD
HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LOS COMUNEROS
- STUDY CHAIR
Diana M Chaparro, MD
HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LOS COMUNEROS
- STUDY CHAIR
Eduardo Ardila, MD
HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LOS COMUNEROS
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Urologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2017
First Posted
June 16, 2017
Study Start
May 10, 2017
Primary Completion
August 31, 2017
Study Completion
September 30, 2017
Last Updated
June 16, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share