A Comparison of Scar Infiltration, Scar Deactivation, and Standard of Care for the Treatment of Chronic, Post-Surgical Pain After Cesarean Section
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare scar infiltration with 0.5-1% Lidocaine at a dose of 3 mg/kg (max dose 300 mg) or scar deactivation with acupuncture surface release technique to determine which is more effective in reducing pain in adult patients with chronic, post-surgical pain related to the site of incision after low transverse Cesarean section compared to standard of care physical therapy with the McKenzie Method.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 25, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 3, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 8, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 8, 2025
CompletedApril 9, 2025
April 1, 2025
5.9 years
April 25, 2019
April 8, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) between each time frame
The DVPRS consists of an 11-point numerical rating scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain. It has been confirmed for reliability and validity in measuring both acute and chronic pain, and is currently the standard for pain measurement throughout DoD and VHA health systems. The DVPRS has demonstrated linear scale qualities allowing parametric methods to be used. The goal for pain reductions will be 50% as a primary outcome.
time 0, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 20 weeks
Change in Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) between each time frame
The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale consists of the total score of two numeric scales measured by the patient and a qualified observer. Each scale assesses the scar by six characteristics on 10-point scales with a 1 corresponding to normal skin and a 10 representing the worst imaginable condition for that characteristic. The Total Score of both scales is calculated by summing scores of the six items resulting in a range of 6 to 60. The POSAS is treated as an interval variable; therefore, parametric methods will be used for this outcome.
time 0, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 20 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Single question asking if subjects' expectations were met? -- Binary yes/no
20 weeeks
Single question asking subjects' change in pain severity reported as a percentile (10%, 20%, ...)
20 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Scar Deactivation Surface Release
EXPERIMENTALAlternating placement of Spring Ten (0.30x40 mm) acupuncture needles to surround scar left in place for a treatment duration of 20 minutes. Needles will be placed at intervals of 1cm to 1.5 cm and will surround the scar with a maximum of 20 needles per treatment.
Scar Infiltration with 0.25-1% Lidocaine
EXPERIMENTALWill consist of calculation of 3 mg/kg dose of 0.5-1% Lidocaine and a dermal followed by subcutaneous injection using 1.5 inch 25 G needle and syringe appropriate for volume based on calculated dose.
Physical Therapy
EXPERIMENTALWill be a referral to physical therapy specifying McKenzie protocol treatment for the presenting complaint. The McKenzie protocol is a form of standard of care physical therapy in which the physical therapist tries to find a cause and effect relationship between the positions the patient usually assumes while sitting, standing, or moving, and the location of pain because of those positions or activities. The therapeutic approach requires a patient to move through a series of activities and test movement to gauge the patient's pain response. The approach then uses that information to develop an exercise program designed to centralize or alleviate the pain.
Interventions
▪ Alternating placement of Spring Ten (0.30x40 mm) acupuncture needles to surround scar left in place for a treatment duration of 20 minutes. Needles will be placed at intervals of 1cm to 1.5 cm and will surround the scar with a maximum of 20 needles per treatment.
▪ Will consist of calculation of 3 mg/kg dose of 0.5-1% Lidocaine and a dermal followed by subcutaneous injection using 1.5 inch 25 G needle and syringe appropriate for volume based on calculated dose.
▪ Will be a referral to physical therapy specifying McKenzie protocol treatment for the presenting complaint. The McKenzie protocol is a form of standard of care physical therapy in which the physical therapist tries to find a cause and effect relationship between the positions the patient usually assumes while sitting, standing, or moving, and the location of pain because of those positions or activities. The therapeutic approach requires a patient to move through a series of activities and test movement to gauge the patient's pain response. The approach then uses that information to develop an exercise program designed to centralize or alleviate the pain.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female DoD beneficiaries age 18 years or older
- months or greater postpartum with abdominal and/or back pain starting after low transverse Cesarean section scar.
- If subject has had prior Scar Deactivation with Surface Release Technique for cesarean section scar they must have completed a washout period of 12 weeks or more.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant
- Prior Scar Deactivation with Surface Release Technique for cesarean section scar within the last 12 weeks.
- Ever had Prior Scar Infiltration with Lidocaine for cesarean section.
- Active cellulitis surrounding scar
- Revision of Cesarean section scar
- Vertical incision or emergent Cesarean section
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Jennifer Loomislead
- Mike O'Callaghan Military Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
375th Medical Group
Scott Air Force Base, Illinois, 62225, United States
Related Publications (15)
Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, Driscoll AK, Mathews TJ. Births: Final Data for 2015. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2017 Jan;66(1):1.
PMID: 28135188BACKGROUNDWasserman JB, Steele-Thornborrow JL, Yuen JS, Halkiotis M, Riggins EM. Chronic caesarian section scar pain treated with fascial scar release techniques: A case series. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2016 Oct;20(4):906-913. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
PMID: 27814873BACKGROUNDOkabayashi K, Ashrafian H, Zacharakis E, Hasegawa H, Kitagawa Y, Athanasiou T, Darzi A. Adhesions after abdominal surgery: a systematic review of the incidence, distribution and severity. Surg Today. 2014 Mar;44(3):405-20. doi: 10.1007/s00595-013-0591-8. Epub 2013 May 9.
PMID: 23657643BACKGROUNDSuleiman S, Johnston DE. The abdominal wall: an overlooked source of pain. Am Fam Physician. 2001 Aug 1;64(3):431-8.
PMID: 11515832BACKGROUNDSrinivasan R, Greenbaum DS. Chronic abdominal wall pain: a frequently overlooked problem. Practical approach to diagnosis and management. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Apr;97(4):824-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05662.x.
PMID: 12003414BACKGROUNDLoos MJ, Scheltinga MR, Mulders LG, Roumen RM. The Pfannenstiel incision as a source of chronic pain. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;111(4):839-46. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816a4efa.
PMID: 18378742BACKGROUNDSpeer LM, Mushkbar S, Erbele T. Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women. Am Fam Physician. 2016 Mar 1;93(5):380-7.
PMID: 26926975BACKGROUNDBrobyn TL, MK Chung, and PJ LaRiccia "Neural therapy: An overlooked game changer for patients suffering chronic pain?" J Pain Relief 2015;4: 184.
BACKGROUNDWeinschenk S. "Neural therapy--A review of the therapeutic use of local anesthetics" Acupuncture and Related Therapies 2012.
BACKGROUNDEgli S, Pfister M, Ludin SM, Puente de la Vega K, Busato A, Fischer L. Long-term results of therapeutic local anesthesia (neural therapy) in 280 referred refractory chronic pain patients. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015 Jun 27;15:200. doi: 10.1186/s12906-015-0735-z.
PMID: 26115657BACKGROUNDHollmann MW, Durieux ME. Local anesthetics and the inflammatory response: a new therapeutic indication? Anesthesiology. 2000 Sep;93(3):858-75. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200009000-00038. No abstract available.
PMID: 10969322BACKGROUNDCassuto J, Sinclair R, Bonderovic M. Anti-inflammatory properties of local anesthetics and their present and potential clinical implications. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Mar;50(3):265-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.00936.x.
PMID: 16480459BACKGROUNDMalone, D, T Clark, and N Wei. "Ultrasound-guided percutaneous injection, hydrodissection, and fenestration for carpal tunnel syndrome: description of a new technique." Journal of Applied Research. 2010;10(3):116-123.
BACKGROUNDLiddle CE, Harris RE. Cellular Reorganization Plays a Vital Role in Acupuncture Analgesia. Med Acupunct. 2018 Feb 1;30(1):15-20. doi: 10.1089/acu.2017.1258.
PMID: 29410716BACKGROUNDFang S. The successful treatment of pain associated with scar tissue using acupuncture. J Acupunct Meridian Stud. 2014 Oct;7(5):262-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jams.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
PMID: 25441952BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 25, 2019
First Posted
May 3, 2019
Study Start
June 1, 2019
Primary Completion
April 8, 2025
Study Completion
April 8, 2025
Last Updated
April 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share