To Study and Evaluate the Effectiveness of Treatment by Percutaneous Electrical NeuroStimulation (PENS) for Post-operative Pain in Cesarean Section Patients Using Primary Relief v 2.0
POPS
1 other identifier
interventional
22
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To study and evaluate the Effectiveness of Treatment by Percutaneous Electrical NeuroStimulation (PENS) for post-operative pain in Cesarean Section patients using First Relief
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 2, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 27, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 4, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2019
CompletedFebruary 5, 2019
January 1, 2019
2 months
January 27, 2019
February 1, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
assessing the effects of PENS therapy in Postoperative period of Lower Segment Caesarean Section pain using VAS score.
To assess the effects of PENS therapy in Post-Operative period of Lower Segment Caesarean Section pain using the Visual Analogue Scale measurement. The level of pain is calculated from the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) before the device is installed and assessed after 2 hours of the device activation. The pain level should be decreased when assessing after 2 hours of device installation. The score should be below 5. where 0 being no pain, 5 being moderate and 10 being maximum pain.
2 hours of device activation
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Evaluate the impact of this treatment in terms of Quality Of Life
2nd day
Study Arms (2)
Primary Relief v 2.0 Device
EXPERIMENTALThe test product or device called Primary Relief v 2.0 device will be used for the study. The study will be conducted for a period of two to three months with the treatment period of 3 - 4 days i.e single treatment (installation). The additional time taken will be to define the characteristics of the patient population and to recruit appropriate patients. Finally, there will be a data analysis and report writing period. Overall, the study is expected to 3 months. The device will be placed onto the auricle part of the ear for percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.
Paracetamol
PLACEBO COMPARATORA control group, receiving a standard treatment as follows: primary choice of analgesic was intravenous Paracetamol , 1 gram, and if the pain relief was inadequate, diclofenac inj. If pain persisted in spite of these measures, 50 mg tramadol was administered intravenously
Interventions
The test product or device called Primary Relief v 2.0 will be used for the study. The study will be conducted for a period of two to three months with the treatment period of 3 - 4 days i.e single treatment (installation). The additional time taken will be to define the characteristics of the patient population and to recruit appropriate patients. Finally, there will be a data analysis and report writing period. Overall, the study is expected to 3 months. The device will be placed onto the auricle part of the ear for percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.
A control group, receiving a standard treatment as follows: primary choice of analgesic was intravenous paracetamol, 1 gram, and if the pain relief was inadequate, diclofenac inj. If pain persisted in spite of these measures, 50 mg tramadol was administered intravenously
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age range between 22 - 35 years
- Patient willing to undergo C-section surgery
- Patient having pains after one hour of post C-Section surgery
- Patients who is conscious and oriented for device installation after anesthetic effect
- Patient who completed required clinical and biochemical investigations as deemed necessary by the gynecologist after post C - section surgery.
- No previous poor obstetrical outcome
- No experience in Han's Acupoint nerve stimulator and TENS for other reasons.
- Term pregnancy (\> 37 weeks of gestation).
- Understands and is willing to participate in the clinical study and can comply with study procedures.
- Normal cognitive and communicative ability as judged by clinical assessment and ability to complete self-reported questionnaires.
You may not qualify if:
- Had been diagnosed with other diseases such as preoperative presence of maternal mental, neurological disease, affecting evaluation of pains and disease condition.
- Had combined with gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, gestational thyroid disease.
- Had taken analgesic drugs
- Had used diazepam, piperazine hydrochloride or other sedative, analgesic drugs in the stage of labor.
- Were overweight or low pregnancy weight, Body mass index (\< 18.5 or \>25 kg/m2).
- Patients who are not agreeing to receive painless labor and not sign the informed consent form.
- Neonatal problem requiring immediate separation from the mother for medical care or NICU admittance.
- Severe placental abruption.
- Hydrops (accumulation of fluid or edema in fetus body tissue and cavities) if secondary to anemia or heart failure.
- Known twin to twin transfusion syndrome (TTS).
- Congenital anomalies that may hamper the procedure (gastroschisis, amphalacele, spina bifida).
- Home birth.
- Severe mental health problem
- Hearing impairment.
- Legal abortion
- +15 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- DyAnsys, Inc.lead
Study Sites (1)
Clinic
Warangal, Telangana, 506002, India
Related Publications (1)
Zimpel SA, Torloni MR, Porfirio GJ, Flumignan RL, da Silva EM. Complementary and alternative therapies for post-caesarean pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 1;9(9):CD011216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011216.pub2.
PMID: 32871021DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 27, 2019
First Posted
February 4, 2019
Study Start
January 2, 2019
Primary Completion
March 1, 2019
Study Completion
July 1, 2019
Last Updated
February 5, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01