NCT03934801

Brief Summary

The objectives of this study are to use the Delphi method to assemble an expert panel representing innovation in asthma treatment, to collect freely suggested recommendation statements concerning OCS tapering (and sub-topics) among severe asthma patients from this panel for peer evaluation, and finally to determine the level of consensus for each statement from the panel as a whole.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
140

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2019

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2019

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 29, 2019

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 2, 2019

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 26, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 26, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

March 25, 2021

Status Verified

March 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

April 29, 2019

Last Update Submit

March 22, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • The number of recommendation statements achieving positive consensus

    When \>= 70% of the expert panel indicates either "agree" or "strongly agree" for a given statement, a positive consensus has been met.

    Approximately month 5

  • The number of recommendation statements achieving negative consensus

    When \>= 70% of the expert panel indicates either "disagree" or "strongly disagree" for a given statement, a positive consensus has been met.

    Approximately month 5

  • The number of recommendation statements achieving consensus for neutrality

    When \>= 70% of the expert panel indicates "neutral" for a given statement, a consensus for neutrality has been met.

    Approximately month 5

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • The number of statements meeting the stopping rule after ranking round 1.

    Approximately month 5

  • The number of statements meeting the stopping rule after ranking round 2.

    Approximately month 5

  • The number of statements meeting the stopping rule after ranking round 3.

    Approximately month 5

Study Arms (1)

The expert panel

Participation in this study will be proposed to a group of experts, including pulmonologists, endocrinologists, allergists, paediatricians and rheumatologists. Additionally, patient advocacy organization representatives will also be invited. Experts meeting eligibility criteria (see section below) are invited to participate. Further details are available via the URL link at the end of this declaration.

Other: Brainstorming 1Other: Ranking Round 1Other: Ranking Round 2Other: Ranking Round 3

Interventions

Expert recommendation statements will be collected for peer evaluation.

The expert panel

Each participant will rank each statement using a likert scale: strongly disagree -- disagree -- neutral -- agree -- strongly agree.

The expert panel

Each participant will rank each statement using a likert scale: strongly disagree -- disagree -- neutral -- agree -- strongly agree.

The expert panel

Each participant will rank each statement using a likert scale: strongly disagree -- disagree -- neutral -- agree -- strongly agree.

The expert panel

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The expert panel may include pulmonologists, endocrinologists, allergists, paediatricians and rheumatologists. Additionally, patient advocacy organization representatives will also be invited. Potential experts may respond to open invitation via the link at the end of this study registration.

You may qualify if:

  • The expert is either a pulmonologist/respiratory disease specialist, an allergist, an endocrinologist, a paediatrician, a rheumatologist or a patient advocacy organisation representative
  • All clinicians involved must manage patients on a weekly basis and have clinical experience in managing disease following oral corticosteroid withdrawal/tapering.
  • Patient advocacy organization representatives must represent a relevant patient group (and provide contact information for their group)

You may not qualify if:

  • Currently employed by a pharmaceutical company, or will have such employment in the upcoming 12 months
  • Ownership in a pharmaceutical company or any other conflict of interest with the present study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Carey Suehs

Montpellier, 34295, France

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Suehs CM, Bourdin A. Tapering of Oral Corticosteroids for the Treatment of Asthma. Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed). 2021 Feb 17:S0300-2896(21)00054-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2021.01.029. Online ahead of print. No abstract available. English, Spanish.

    PMID: 33722424BACKGROUND
  • Suehs CM, Menzies-Gow A, Price D, Bleecker ER, Canonica GW, Gurnell M, Bourdin A; Oral Corticosteroids Tapering Delphi Expert Panel. Expert Consensus on the Tapering of Oral Corticosteroids for the Treatment of Asthma. A Delphi Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Apr 1;203(7):871-881. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202007-2721OC.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bronchial DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesLung Diseases, ObstructiveLung DiseasesRespiratory HypersensitivityHypersensitivity, ImmediateHypersensitivityImmune System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Carey Suehs, PhD

    Association Jean Baptiste Desbrest

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2019

First Posted

May 2, 2019

Study Start

April 1, 2019

Primary Completion

September 26, 2019

Study Completion

September 26, 2019

Last Updated

March 25, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Anonymized data will be shared on an appropriate public platform at the time of publication.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
Anonymized data will be shared on an appropriate public platform at the time of publication.
More information

Locations