Collaborating to Implement Cross-System Interventions in Child Welfare and Substance Use
1 other identifier
interventional
9
1 country
1
Brief Summary
As a result of the opiate crisis, child welfare agencies have experienced an increase in the number of children in foster care as parental substance use puts children at greater risk of maltreatment. To facilitate implementation of the Sobriety Treatment and Recovery Team (START) model, this study (1) identifies collaborative strategies associated with effective implementation and service outcomes given system and organizational context, (2) uses this evidence to specify strategies and develop a decision support guide to help agency leaders select collaborative strategies, and (3) assesses the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of the decision support guide.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 22, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 25, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 16, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2024
CompletedSeptember 26, 2024
February 1, 2024
21 days
April 22, 2019
September 24, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Perceived Acceptability
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) - 4 survey items that assess participants' agreement about the degree to which they perceive the intervention to be acceptable. Participants rate their agreement along a 5 point scale, where 1= completely disagree and 5= completely agree. Scores from the four items will be averaged where higher scores denote greater perceived acceptability. (Weiner, B. J., Lewis, C. C., Stanick, C., Powell, B. J., Dorsey, C. N., Clary, A. S., … Halko, H. (2017). Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implementation Science, 12(108), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3)
One time point (Post-test only), immediately after receipt of intervention
Perceived Appropriateness
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) - 4 survey items that assess participants' agreement about the degree to which they perceive the intervention to be appropriate. Participants rate their agreement along a 5 point scale, where 1= completely disagree and 5= completely agree. Scores from the four items will be averaged where higher scores denote greater perceived appropriateness. (Weiner, B. J., Lewis, C. C., Stanick, C., Powell, B. J., Dorsey, C. N., Clary, A. S., … Halko, H. (2017). Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implementation Science, 12(108), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3)
One time point (Post-test only), immediately after receipt of intervention
Perceived Feasibility
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) - 4 survey items that assess participants' agreement about the degree to which they perceive the intervention to be feasible. Participants rate their agreement along a 5 point scale, where 1= completely disagree and 5= completely agree. Scores from the four items will be averaged where higher scores denote greater perceived feasibility. (Weiner, B. J., Lewis, C. C., Stanick, C., Powell, B. J., Dorsey, C. N., Clary, A. S., … Halko, H. (2017). Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implementation Science, 12(108), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3)
One time point (Post-test only), immediately after receipt of intervention
Study Arms (1)
Decision-Support
EXPERIMENTALAn electronic copy of a collaboration decision-support guide.
Interventions
Electronic toolkit intended to help organizational leaders select partners and negotiate partnerships for implementation. This will contain: 1) a brief summary of collaboration approaches associated with implementation, 2) detailed descriptions of collaboration strategies, 3) a decision analysis tool that guides the selection of collaborative strategies given the community context, and 4) sample contract or agreement language that specifies the nature of the partnership and expectations.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Our participants included implementation support professionals who provide training and technical assistance to child welfare agencies in Ohio that are implementing Ohio START. All individuals will be adults and recruited based on their employment/position.
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals who do not provide implementation support.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Related Publications (2)
Chuang E, Bunger A, Smith R, Girth A, Phillips R, Miech E, Lancaster K, Martin J, Gadel F, Himmeger M, McClellan J, Millisor J, Willauer T, Powell BJ, Dellor E, Aarons GA. Collaboration strategies affecting implementation of a cross-systems intervention for child welfare and substance use treatment: a mixed methods analysis. Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Nov 11;5(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00666-w.
PMID: 39529175DERIVEDBunger AC, Chuang E, Girth A, Lancaster KE, Gadel F, Himmeger M, Saldana L, Powell BJ, Aarons GA. Establishing cross-systems collaborations for implementation: protocol for a longitudinal mixed methods study. Implement Sci. 2020 Jul 16;15(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01016-9.
PMID: 32677987DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alicia Bunger, PhD
Ohio State University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2019
First Posted
April 29, 2019
Study Start
April 25, 2024
Primary Completion
May 16, 2024
Study Completion
May 31, 2024
Last Updated
September 26, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share