NCT03931005

Brief Summary

As a result of the opiate crisis, child welfare agencies have experienced an increase in the number of children in foster care as parental substance use puts children at greater risk of maltreatment. To facilitate implementation of the Sobriety Treatment and Recovery Team (START) model, this study (1) identifies collaborative strategies associated with effective implementation and service outcomes given system and organizational context, (2) uses this evidence to specify strategies and develop a decision support guide to help agency leaders select collaborative strategies, and (3) assesses the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of the decision support guide.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
9

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 22, 2019

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 29, 2019

Completed
5 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 25, 2024

Completed
21 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 16, 2024

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 31, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

September 26, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

21 days

First QC Date

April 22, 2019

Last Update Submit

September 24, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Perceived Acceptability

    Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) - 4 survey items that assess participants' agreement about the degree to which they perceive the intervention to be acceptable. Participants rate their agreement along a 5 point scale, where 1= completely disagree and 5= completely agree. Scores from the four items will be averaged where higher scores denote greater perceived acceptability. (Weiner, B. J., Lewis, C. C., Stanick, C., Powell, B. J., Dorsey, C. N., Clary, A. S., … Halko, H. (2017). Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implementation Science, 12(108), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3)

    One time point (Post-test only), immediately after receipt of intervention

  • Perceived Appropriateness

    Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) - 4 survey items that assess participants' agreement about the degree to which they perceive the intervention to be appropriate. Participants rate their agreement along a 5 point scale, where 1= completely disagree and 5= completely agree. Scores from the four items will be averaged where higher scores denote greater perceived appropriateness. (Weiner, B. J., Lewis, C. C., Stanick, C., Powell, B. J., Dorsey, C. N., Clary, A. S., … Halko, H. (2017). Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implementation Science, 12(108), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3)

    One time point (Post-test only), immediately after receipt of intervention

  • Perceived Feasibility

    Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) - 4 survey items that assess participants' agreement about the degree to which they perceive the intervention to be feasible. Participants rate their agreement along a 5 point scale, where 1= completely disagree and 5= completely agree. Scores from the four items will be averaged where higher scores denote greater perceived feasibility. (Weiner, B. J., Lewis, C. C., Stanick, C., Powell, B. J., Dorsey, C. N., Clary, A. S., … Halko, H. (2017). Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implementation Science, 12(108), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3)

    One time point (Post-test only), immediately after receipt of intervention

Study Arms (1)

Decision-Support

EXPERIMENTAL

An electronic copy of a collaboration decision-support guide.

Other: Collaboration Decision Support Guide

Interventions

Electronic toolkit intended to help organizational leaders select partners and negotiate partnerships for implementation. This will contain: 1) a brief summary of collaboration approaches associated with implementation, 2) detailed descriptions of collaboration strategies, 3) a decision analysis tool that guides the selection of collaborative strategies given the community context, and 4) sample contract or agreement language that specifies the nature of the partnership and expectations.

Decision-Support

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Our participants included implementation support professionals who provide training and technical assistance to child welfare agencies in Ohio that are implementing Ohio START. All individuals will be adults and recruited based on their employment/position.

You may not qualify if:

  • Individuals who do not provide implementation support.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Ohio State University

Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Chuang E, Bunger A, Smith R, Girth A, Phillips R, Miech E, Lancaster K, Martin J, Gadel F, Himmeger M, McClellan J, Millisor J, Willauer T, Powell BJ, Dellor E, Aarons GA. Collaboration strategies affecting implementation of a cross-systems intervention for child welfare and substance use treatment: a mixed methods analysis. Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Nov 11;5(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00666-w.

  • Bunger AC, Chuang E, Girth A, Lancaster KE, Gadel F, Himmeger M, Saldana L, Powell BJ, Aarons GA. Establishing cross-systems collaborations for implementation: protocol for a longitudinal mixed methods study. Implement Sci. 2020 Jul 16;15(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01016-9.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Substance-Related Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Chemically-Induced DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Alicia Bunger, PhD

    Ohio State University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2019

First Posted

April 29, 2019

Study Start

April 25, 2024

Primary Completion

May 16, 2024

Study Completion

May 31, 2024

Last Updated

September 26, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations