Contrast Enhanced Mammography in Diagnosing Patients With Suspicious Breast Findings
Improving PPV3 Using Contrast Enhanced Mammography (CEM) in Diagnostic Assessment by Reducing Benign Tissue Diagnosis (FP3) - A Single-Arm Prospective Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
107
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This pilot trial studies how well contrast enhanced mammography works in diagnosing patients with suspicious breast findings. Diagnostic procedures, such as contrast enhanced mammography, may help to reclassify findings seen on diagnostic mammography and ultrasound as benign or likely benign with what would otherwise require biopsy for confirmation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 24, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 23, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 27, 2023
CompletedApril 29, 2025
April 1, 2025
1.5 years
April 24, 2019
April 28, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Sensitivity of contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) to classify a lesion as benign, probably benign, or suspicious
The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (mammogram+ultrasound \[MM+US\] and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.
Up to 1 year
Sensitivity of MM to classify a lesion as benign, probably benign, or suspicious
The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.
Up to 1 year
Sensitivity of US to classify a lesion as benign, probably benign, or suspicious
The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.
Up to 1 year
Specificity of CEM to classify a lesion as benign, probably benign, or suspicious
The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.
Up to 1 year
Specificity of MM to classify a lesion as benign, probably benign, or suspicious
The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.
Up to 1 year
Specificity of US to classify a lesion as benign, probably benign, or suspicious
The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.
Up to 1 year
False negative rate of CEM
The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.
Up to 1 year
False negative rate of MM
The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.
Up to 1 year
False negative rate of US
The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.
Up to 1 year
False positive rate of CEM
The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.
Up to 1 year
False positive rate of MM
The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.
Up to 1 year
False positive rate of US
The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.
Up to 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Positive predictive value of CEM
Up to 1 year
Positive predictive value of MM
Up to 1 year
Positive predictive value of US
Up to 1 year
Negative predictive value of CEM
Up to 1 year
Negative predictive value of MM
Up to 1 year
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Diagnostic (CEM)
EXPERIMENTALPatients undergo contrast enhanced mammography prior to scheduled standard of care core needle biopsy of the breast on the same day.
Interventions
Undergo CEM
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women with digital breast tomosynthesis and/or ultrasound assessments of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 and 5 lesions with recommendation of needle biopsy for tissue diagnosis.
- Abnormal findings include masses, focal, global or developing asymmetries, architecture distortions, or \> 1 cm of suspicious calcifications with or without associated ultrasound abnormal findings.
- Scheduled for imaging guided percutaneous needle biopsy.
- Provide signed and dated informed consent form.
- If patient is of childbearing potential, a negative pregnancy test, urine or blood, within 14 days prior to the scan.
You may not qualify if:
- \< 1 cm span of calcifications without an ultrasound correlate.
- Pregnant patients.
- Patients with known allergy to iodinated contrast material.
- If patient answers YES to any of the below questions they need glomerular filtration rate (gFR) prior to contrast administration regardless of their age:
- Have you ever been told you have renal problems?
- Have you ever been told you have protein in your urine?
- Do you have high blood pressure?
- Do you have diabetes?
- Do you have gout?
- Have you ever had kidney surgery?
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lydia Liao
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2019
First Posted
April 29, 2019
Study Start
June 23, 2020
Primary Completion
December 31, 2021
Study Completion
January 27, 2023
Last Updated
April 29, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04