NCT03929783

Brief Summary

This pilot trial studies how well contrast enhanced mammography works in diagnosing patients with suspicious breast findings. Diagnostic procedures, such as contrast enhanced mammography, may help to reclassify findings seen on diagnostic mammography and ultrasound as benign or likely benign with what would otherwise require biopsy for confirmation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
107

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 24, 2019

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 29, 2019

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 23, 2020

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2021

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 27, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

April 29, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

April 24, 2019

Last Update Submit

April 28, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (12)

  • Sensitivity of contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) to classify a lesion as benign, probably benign, or suspicious

    The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (mammogram+ultrasound \[MM+US\] and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.

    Up to 1 year

  • Sensitivity of MM to classify a lesion as benign, probably benign, or suspicious

    The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.

    Up to 1 year

  • Sensitivity of US to classify a lesion as benign, probably benign, or suspicious

    The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.

    Up to 1 year

  • Specificity of CEM to classify a lesion as benign, probably benign, or suspicious

    The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.

    Up to 1 year

  • Specificity of MM to classify a lesion as benign, probably benign, or suspicious

    The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.

    Up to 1 year

  • Specificity of US to classify a lesion as benign, probably benign, or suspicious

    The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.

    Up to 1 year

  • False negative rate of CEM

    The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.

    Up to 1 year

  • False negative rate of MM

    The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.

    Up to 1 year

  • False negative rate of US

    The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.

    Up to 1 year

  • False positive rate of CEM

    The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.

    Up to 1 year

  • False positive rate of MM

    The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.

    Up to 1 year

  • False positive rate of US

    The total number of suspicious and benign lesions on each modality (MM+US and CEM) will be calculated and compared to a final tissue diagnosis independently.

    Up to 1 year

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Positive predictive value of CEM

    Up to 1 year

  • Positive predictive value of MM

    Up to 1 year

  • Positive predictive value of US

    Up to 1 year

  • Negative predictive value of CEM

    Up to 1 year

  • Negative predictive value of MM

    Up to 1 year

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Diagnostic (CEM)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients undergo contrast enhanced mammography prior to scheduled standard of care core needle biopsy of the breast on the same day.

Procedure: Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography

Interventions

Undergo CEM

Also known as: CEDM, Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography
Diagnostic (CEM)

Eligibility Criteria

Age30 Years - 80 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Women with digital breast tomosynthesis and/or ultrasound assessments of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 and 5 lesions with recommendation of needle biopsy for tissue diagnosis.
  • Abnormal findings include masses, focal, global or developing asymmetries, architecture distortions, or \> 1 cm of suspicious calcifications with or without associated ultrasound abnormal findings.
  • Scheduled for imaging guided percutaneous needle biopsy.
  • Provide signed and dated informed consent form.
  • If patient is of childbearing potential, a negative pregnancy test, urine or blood, within 14 days prior to the scan.

You may not qualify if:

  • \< 1 cm span of calcifications without an ultrasound correlate.
  • Pregnant patients.
  • Patients with known allergy to iodinated contrast material.
  • If patient answers YES to any of the below questions they need glomerular filtration rate (gFR) prior to contrast administration regardless of their age:
  • Have you ever been told you have renal problems?
  • Have you ever been told you have protein in your urine?
  • Do you have high blood pressure?
  • Do you have diabetes?
  • Do you have gout?
  • Have you ever had kidney surgery?

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Study Officials

  • Lydia Liao

    Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2019

First Posted

April 29, 2019

Study Start

June 23, 2020

Primary Completion

December 31, 2021

Study Completion

January 27, 2023

Last Updated

April 29, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-04

Locations