Bougie or Stylet In Patients Undergoing Intubation Emergently (BOUGIE)
BOUGIE
1 other identifier
interventional
1,106
1 country
11
Brief Summary
Complications are common during tracheal intubations performed outside of the operating room. Successful intubation on the first attempt has been associated with a lower rate of procedural complications, but the proportion of critically ill patients intubated on the first attempt during tracheal intubations outside of the operating room is less than 90%. The bougie, a thin semi-rigid tube that can be placed into the trachea, allowing a Seldinger-like technique of intubating a patient's airway, has been traditionally reserved for difficult or failed airways. However, a recent single center trial of adult patients intubated in an emergency department demonstrated that use of the bougie on the first attempt improved intubation success, compared to use of a traditional stylet. Theinvestigators propose a multi-center randomized trial to compare first-attempt bougie use versus endotracheal tube with stylet use for tracheal intubation of critically ill adults in the ED and ICU.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 19, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 26, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 29, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 14, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 13, 2021
CompletedMarch 22, 2021
March 1, 2021
1.8 years
April 19, 2019
March 18, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of intubations with successful intubation on the first attempt
The primary outcome is successful intubation on the first attempt. Successful intubation on the first attempt is defined as placement of an endotracheal tube in the trachea (confirmed by standard means including capnography) following: (1) a single insertion of a laryngoscope blade into the mouth and (2) EITHER a single insertion of a bougie into the mouth followed by a single insertion of an endotracheal tube into the mouth OR a single insertion of an endotracheal tube with stylet into the mouth.
from induction to 2 minutes following tracheal intubation
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of intubations with severe hypoxemia
from induction to 2 minutes following tracheal intubation
Other Outcomes (14)
Cormack-Lehane grade of glottic view on first attempt
from induction to 2 minutes following tracheal intubation
Number of laryngoscopy attempts
from induction to 2 minutes following tracheal intubation
Number of attempts at passing bougie
from induction to 2 minutes following tracheal intubation
- +11 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
BOUGIE
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor patients randomized to use of a bougie, the operator will use a bougie on the first attempt at intubation. If successful, an assistant will load an endotracheal tube over the bougie, and the operator (without removing the laryngoscope from the mouth) will guide the tube through the vocal cords to the desired depth in the trachea. If the bougie is not successfully placed in the trachea or the endotracheal tube cannot be successfully advanced over the bougie on the first attempt at intubation, the operator may use any approach during subsequent attempts at tracheal intubation.
Endotracheal Tube with Stylet
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor patients randomized to use of an endotracheal tube with stylet, the operator will use an endotracheal tube containing a removeable, malleable stylet, on the first attempt at intubation. Manipulation of the shape/curve of the endotracheal tube with stylet is at the discretion of the operator, however a "straight-to-cuff" shape and a bend angle of 25° to 35° is encouraged. The stylet will be left in place until the tube is advanced to the trachea. If the endotracheal tube with stylet is not successfully placed in the trachea on the first attempt at intubation, the operator may use any approach during subsequent attempts at tracheal intubation.
Interventions
endotracheal tube preloaded with a removable, malleable stylet
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient is located in a participating unit of an adult hospital
- Planned procedure is tracheal intubation with sedative administration (or tracheal intubation without sedative administration during cardiac arrest)
- Planned operator is a clinician expected to routinely perform tracheal intubation in the participating unit
- Planned laryngoscopy device is a non-hyperangulated laryngoscope blade
You may not qualify if:
- Patient is pregnant
- Patient is a prisoner
- Urgency of intubation precludes safe performance of study procedures
- Operator feels an approach to intubation other than use of a bougie or use of an endotracheal tube with stylet would be best for the care of the patient
- Operator feels use of a bougie is required or contraindicated for the care of the patient
- Operator feels use of an endotracheal tube with stylet is required or contraindicated for the care of the patient
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (11)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States
University of Colorado
Denver, Colorado, 80045, United States
Denver Health and Hospital Authority
Denver, Colorado, 80204, United States
University of Iowa Hospital
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
Louisiana State University School of Medicine
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, United States
Ochsner Medical Center | Ochsner Health System
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, United States
Lincoln Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10451, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Wake Forest Baptist Health
Lexington, North Carolina, 27292, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37209, United States
Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98104, United States
Related Publications (3)
Driver BE, Prekker ME, Klein LR, Reardon RF, Miner JR, Fagerstrom ET, Cleghorn MR, McGill JW, Cole JB. Effect of Use of a Bougie vs Endotracheal Tube and Stylet on First-Attempt Intubation Success Among Patients With Difficult Airways Undergoing Emergency Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Jun 5;319(21):2179-2189. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.6496.
PMID: 29800096BACKGROUNDDriver BE, Semler MW, Self WH, Ginde AA, Trent SA, Gandotra S, Smith LM, Page DB, Vonderhaar DJ, West JR, Joffe AM, Mitchell SH, Doerschug KC, Hughes CG, High K, Landsperger JS, Jackson KE, Howell MP, Robison SW, Gaillard JP, Whitson MR, Barnes CM, Latimer AJ, Koppurapu VS, Alvis BD, Russell DW, Gibbs KW, Wang L, Lindsell CJ, Janz DR, Rice TW, Prekker ME, Casey JD; BOUGIE Investigators and the Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. Effect of Use of a Bougie vs Endotracheal Tube With Stylet on Successful Intubation on the First Attempt Among Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Dec 28;326(24):2488-2497. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.22002.
PMID: 34879143DERIVEDDriver B, Semler MW, Self WH, Ginde AA, Gandotra S, Trent SA, Smith LM, Gaillard JP, Page DB, Whitson MR, Vonderhaar DJ, Joffe AM, West JR, Hughes C, Landsperger JS, Howell MP, Russell DW, Gulati S, Bentov I, Mitchell S, Latimer A, Doerschug K, Koppurapu V, Gibbs KW, Wang L, Lindsell CJ, Janz D, Rice TW, Prekker ME, Casey JD; BOUGIE Investigators# and the Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. BOugie or stylet in patients UnderGoing Intubation Emergently (BOUGIE): protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2021 May 25;11(5):e047790. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047790.
PMID: 34035106DERIVED
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jonathan D Casey, MD
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
- STUDY CHAIR
Matthew W Semler, MD, MSc
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Brian E Driver, MD
Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthew E Prekker, MD
Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Fellow
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 19, 2019
First Posted
April 26, 2019
Study Start
April 29, 2019
Primary Completion
February 14, 2021
Study Completion
March 13, 2021
Last Updated
March 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share