Transforaminal Epidural Injection in Acute Sciatica
TEIAS
1 other identifier
interventional
142
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Patients suffering from sciatica are treated conservatively for the first 8 weeks due to the favourable prognosis. This period is preferably extended up to 14-16 weeks after which patients may opt for surgery. However, patients may experience severe discomfort due to pain in the leg which can lead to decreased physical activity and socio-economic problems. An adequate therapy to alleviate symptoms during this period of 'wait-and-see' is lacking. In this study, patients will be randomized to treatment with transforaminal epidural injections or standard oral pain medication.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 10, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 23, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2026
ExpectedOctober 19, 2023
October 1, 2023
6.5 years
April 10, 2019
October 18, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for leg pain
Pain intensity in the leg using the NRS. 0 is the minimal score indicating no pain, 10 is the maximum indicating the worst imaginable pain. Scale increases with increments of 1.
2 weeks after randomization
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for leg pain
Baseline, 1, 4, 10 and 21 weeks after randomization
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for back pain
Baseline, 1, 2, 4, 10 and 21 weeks after randomization
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Baseline, 1, 2, 4, 10 and 21 weeks after randomization
EuroQoL Cost Utility (EQ-5D)
Baseline, 2, 10 and 21 weeks after randomization
Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale
Baseline, 2, 10 and 21 weeks after randomization
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Transforaminal Epidural Injection
EXPERIMENTALTransforaminal Epidural Injection containing 1,5 mL lidocaine 2% and 40mg methylprednisolone acetate for injections L3 or below Transforaminal Epidural Injection containing 1,5 mL lidocaine 1% and 10mg dexamethasone for injections above L3
Oral pain medication
NO INTERVENTIONPatients will receive oral pain medication according to general practitioner guidelines.
Interventions
In combination with dexamethasone or methylprednisolone acetate
In combination with lidocaine
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed with sciatica by GP
- NRS leg pain of 6 or more on a 10-point NRS scale
- Minimum duration of symptoms of 3 weeks and maximum duration of 8 weeks
You may not qualify if:
- Age under 18 years
- Condition preventing to receive transforaminal epidural injection
- Severe scoliosis
- Transforaminal epidural injection received in 6 months before randomization date
- Surgery for sciatica at the same level
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- C.L.A.Vleggeert-Lankamplead
- Spaarne Gasthuiscollaborator
- Stichting Achmea Gezondheidszorcollaborator
- Posthumus Meyjes Fondscollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Spaarne Gasthuis
Haarlem, Netherlands
Spaarne Gasthuis
Hoofddorp, Netherlands
Related Publications (15)
Peul WC, van Houwelingen HC, van den Hout WB, Brand R, Eekhof JA, Tans JT, Thomeer RT, Koes BW; Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group. Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica. N Engl J Med. 2007 May 31;356(22):2245-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa064039.
PMID: 17538084BACKGROUNDHofstede SN, van Bodegom-Vos L, Wentink MM, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, Vliet Vlieland TP, Marang-van de Mheen PJ; DISC study group. Most important factors for the implementation of shared decision making in sciatica care: ranking among professionals and patients. PLoS One. 2014 Apr 7;9(4):e94176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094176. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 24710328BACKGROUNDJoswig H, Neff A, Ruppert C, Hildebrandt G, Stienen MN. The Value of Short-Term Pain Relief in Predicting the Long-Term Outcome of Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections. World Neurosurg. 2017 Nov;107:764-771. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.055. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
PMID: 28838872BACKGROUNDSpijker-Huiges A, Vermeulen K, Winters JC, van Wijhe M, van der Meer K. Epidural steroids for lumbosacral radicular syndrome compared to usual care: quality of life and cost utility in general practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Mar;96(3):381-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.017. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
PMID: 25448243BACKGROUNDKuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, Michael CJ. The tissue origin of low back pain and sciatica: a report of pain response to tissue stimulation during operations on the lumbar spine using local anesthesia. Orthop Clin North Am. 1991 Apr;22(2):181-7.
PMID: 1826546BACKGROUNDTakahashi H, Suguro T, Okazima Y, Motegi M, Okada Y, Kakiuchi T. Inflammatory cytokines in the herniated disc of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Jan 15;21(2):218-24. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199601150-00011.
PMID: 8720407BACKGROUNDEl Barzouhi A, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, Lycklama A Nijeholt GJ, Van der Kallen BF, van den Hout WB, Verwoerd AJ, Koes BW, Peul WC; Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group. Magnetic resonance imaging interpretation in patients with sciatica who are potential candidates for lumbar disc surgery. PLoS One. 2013 Jul 10;8(7):e68411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068411. Print 2013.
PMID: 23874616BACKGROUNDVerwoerd AJ, Peul WC, Willemsen SP, Koes BW, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, el Barzouhi A, Luijsterburg PA, Verhagen AP. Diagnostic accuracy of history taking to assess lumbosacral nerve root compression. Spine J. 2014 Sep 1;14(9):2028-37. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.049. Epub 2013 Dec 8.
PMID: 24325881BACKGROUNDel Barzouhi A, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, Lycklama a Nijeholt GJ, Van der Kallen BF, van den Hout WB, Koes BW, Peul WC; Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group. Reliability of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging findings and their correlation with clinical outcome in patients with sciatica. Spine J. 2014 Nov 1;14(11):2598-607. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.02.028. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
PMID: 24561397BACKGROUNDel Barzouhi A, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, Lycklama a Nijeholt GJ, Van der Kallen BF, van den Hout WB, Koes BW, Peul WC; Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group. Influence of low back pain and prognostic value of MRI in sciatica patients in relation to back pain. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 17;9(3):e90800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090800. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 24637890BACKGROUNDVerwoerd AJH, Mens J, El Barzouhi A, Peul WC, Koes BW, Verhagen AP. A diagnostic study in patients with sciatica establishing the importance of localization of worsening of pain during coughing, sneezing and straining to assess nerve root compression on MRI. Eur Spine J. 2016 May;25(5):1389-1392. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4393-8. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
PMID: 26842881BACKGROUNDEl Barzouhi A, Verwoerd AJ, Peul WC, Verhagen AP, Lycklama A Nijeholt GJ, Van der Kallen BF, Koes BW, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL; Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group. Prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with sciatica. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jun;24(6):978-85. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.SPINE15858. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
PMID: 26871651BACKGROUNDKatz NP, Paillard FC, Ekman E. Determining the clinical importance of treatment benefits for interventions for painful orthopedic conditions. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Feb 3;10:24. doi: 10.1186/s13018-014-0144-x.
PMID: 25645576BACKGROUNDJoswig H, Neff A, Ruppert C, Hildebrandt G, Stienen MN. The Value of Short-Term Pain Relief in Predicting the One-Month Outcome of Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections. World Neurosurg. 2016 Dec;96:323-333. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.09.016. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
PMID: 27641258BACKGROUNDVerheijen E, Munts AG, van Haagen O, de Vries D, Dekkers O, van den Hout W, Vleggeert-Lankamp C. Transforaminal epidural injection versus continued conservative care in acute sciatica (TEIAS trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2019 Sep 3;19(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1445-9.
PMID: 31481010DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carmen LA Vleggeert-Lankamp, MD Msc Ph.D
Leiden University Medical Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Since masking is not possible for treatment with injections and oral pain medication, this is an open-label study. Outcomes are assessed by patients through online questionnaires and therefore the outcome assessor is not masked as well.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. C.L.A. Vleggeert-Lankamp
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 10, 2019
First Posted
April 23, 2019
Study Start
June 1, 2019
Primary Completion
December 1, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Last Updated
October 19, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share