NCT03924167

Brief Summary

Alcohol and other drug (AOD) abuse and violence in families are co-occurring risk factors that drive health disparities and mortality among Native Americans (NA), making the long-term goal of this research is to promote health and wellness, while preventing and reducing AOD abuse and violence in NA families by testing an efficacious, sustainable, culturally-relevant and family-centered intervention for cross-national dissemination. The central hypothesis is that the sustainable and community-based Weaving Healthy Families program, will reduce and postpone AOD use among NA adults and youth, decrease and prevent violence in families, and promote resilience and wellness (including mental health) among NA adults and youth. The expected outcomes of the proposed research are an efficacious, culturally relevant, and sustainable community based program to promote health and wellness that will address the factors that drive health disparities and promote individual, family, and community resilience.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
1,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 11, 2019

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 23, 2019

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 30, 2020

Completed
4.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2025

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

February 20, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

4.7 years

First QC Date

April 11, 2019

Last Update Submit

February 19, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (13)

  • Change in the AUDIT= Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test

    The 10-item AUDIT identifies alcohol consumption, drinking behaviors, and alcohol-related problems among adults. Scores for each question range from 0 to 4, with the first response for each question (eg never) scoring 0, the second (eg less than monthly) scoring 1, the third (eg monthly) scoring 2, the fourth (eg weekly) scoring 3, and the last response (eg. daily or almost daily) scoring 4. For questions 9 and 10, which only have three response, the scoring is 0, 2 and 4 (from left to right). A score of 8 or more is associated with harmful or hazardous drinking, a score of 13 or more in women, and 15 or more in men, is likely to indicate alcohol dependence.

    Change from Baseline, Pre-test, Post-test (within one month of completion of intervention), 6, 9, and 12 month follow-ups.

  • Change in the DAST= Drug Abuse Screening Test

    A 10-item form used to assess drug use with adults. Participants receive 1 point for every "yes" answer with the exception of question #3, for which a "no" answer receives 1 point. Degree of problems by score: 0=no problems reported, 1-2 = low level, 3-5=moderate level, 6-8=substantial level, 9-10=severe level.

    Change from Baseline, Pre-test, Post-test (within one month of completion of intervention), 6, 9, and 12 month follow-ups.

  • Change in the AADIS= Adolescent Alcohol and Drug Involvement Scale

    Adolescent alcohol and other drug (AOD) use will be assessed using the AADIS, which assesses frequency of AOD as well as 14 items assessing severity of AOD misuse. Scores are added with results indicating: Scores of 0 = No alcohol or other drug use. Scores of 1-36 = Alcohol and/or other drug use present, does not reach threshold for substance use disorder based on DSM-IV criteria. Scores of 37 or higher = Alcohol and/or other drug use present which may reach DSM IV criteria.

    Change from Baseline, Pre-test, Post-test (within one month of completion of intervention), 6, 9, and 12 month follow-ups.

  • Change in the CRAFFT=Car, Relax, Alone, Forget, Friends, Trouble

    A 9-item evidenced-based screening tool, will be used to assess AOD misuse, (alcohol and drug use separately and holistically). 9 items. 1-3 number of days used substances. 4-9 yes, no responses with each "yes" response scoring 1 point. A total score of 2 or higher is a positive screen, indicating a need for additional assessment.

    Change from Baseline, Pre-test, Post-test (within one month of completion of intervention), 6, 9, and 12 month follow-ups.

  • Change in the FES=Family Environment Scale-Short Form

    Assesses key components of healthy functioning through the following subscales: cohesion, expressiveness, conflict, independence, achievement orientation, intellectual and cultural orientation, active-recreational orientation, moral-religious emphasis, organization, and control. 90 item scale. Respondents mark whether each item is true (1) = 1 or false (2) =0 for them. Scoring: To determine a person's raw score (RS), count the number of responses in each subscale, and enter the total in the RS box at the bottom. Scores range from 0-10 for each subscale, with higher scores indicating higher levels of that construct. To determine the family's mean RS for each subscale, average the subscale raw scores for all members of that family.

    Change from Baseline, Pre-test, Post-test (within one month of completion of intervention), 6, 9, and 12 month follow-ups.

  • Change in the FRI=Family Resilience Scale

    Assesses family resilience in current family and family of origin. Scoring: Add responses for each item. Total scores range from 0-20, with higher scores indicating a higher degree family resilience. Each of the items can be thought of as a protective factor, cumulatively contributing to the holistic measure of family resilience.

    Change from Baseline, Pre-test, Post-test (within one month of completion of intervention), 6, 9, and 12 month follow-ups.

  • Change in the CD-RISC=Conner-Davidson Resilience Scale

    Assesses individual or psychological resilience. 10-item scale. Scoring of the scale is based on summing the total of all items, each of which is scored from 0-4. For the CD-RISC-10, the total score ranges from 0-40. Higher scores indicate higher levels of psychological resilience.

    Change from Baseline, Pre-test, Post-test (within one month of completion of intervention), 6, 9, and 12 month follow-ups.

  • Change in the CTS-2=Conflict Tactics Scale 2

    The CTS2 is a comprehensive self-reported inventory designed to measure five scales: Negotiation (positive verbal conflict resolution skills), Psychological Aggression, Physical Assault, Sexual Coercion, and Injury. Respondents rate each item on a 7-point Likert- style frequency scale (0 = this has never happened before, 1 = once in the past year, 2 = twice in the past year, 3 = 3-5 time in the past year, 4 = 6-10 times in the past year, 5 = 11-20 times in the past year, 6 = more than 20 times in the past year, and 7 = not in the past year, but it did happen before). To create interpretable scores, values 1 and 2 remained the same, and values 3 through 6 were recoded to be the midpoints (3 = 4, 4 = 8, 5 = 15, 6 = 25). Frequency scores (how often) for each subscale are added (Range 1-12 for frequency, higher scores indicating higher levels of each subscale). Dummy are created with each item and subscale for prevalence (1=yes in the past year; 0=not in the past year).

    Change from Baseline, Pre-test, Post-test (within one month of completion of intervention), 6, 9, and 12 month follow-ups.

  • Change in the DAS-SF/DAS-C= Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale-Short Form/Child

    Assesses dysfunctional attitudes, which have been shown to be precursors to depression and stress. Items are on a 4-point Likert scale (1-Totally agree to 4-Totally disagree). Items should be scored so that total score reflects greater dysfunctional attitudes. This means that most items will be reverse coded. Subtracting 5 from an item score will reverse score that item. Items are on a 4-point Likert scale (1-Totally agree to 4-Totally disagree).

    Change from Baseline, Pre-test, Post-test (within one month of completion of intervention), 6, 9, and 12 month follow-ups.

  • Change in the SWLS=Satisfaction with Life Scale

    A short measure of life satisfaction. The SWLS is a five-item scale designed to measure global judgements about one's life satisfaction. Respondents indicated how much they agreed or disagreed with each of the five items using a seven-point scale that ranged from 'strongly disagree' to 'strongly agree'. The summed scale ranged from 5-35, with higher scores indicating greater life satisfaction.

    Change from Baseline, Pre-test, Post-test (within one month of completion of intervention), 6, 9, and 12 month follow-ups.

  • Change in the DERS-18= Difficulties in Emotional Regulation Scale

    An 18-item measure of emotional regulation and anger management. Sum items for each subscale with Items 1, 4, and 6 being reverse-coded. Add subscale totals for the total summative scale as follows: Awareness (# 1, 4, 6); Clarity (#2, 3, 5); Goals (#8, 12, 15); Impulse (#9, 16, 18); Nonacceptance (#7, 13, 14), and Strategies (#10, 11, 17).

    Change from Baseline, Pre-test, Post-test (within one month of completion of intervention), 6, 9, and 12 month follow-ups.

  • Change in the BRFSS=Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

    Items taken from the BRFSS on the modules on chronic health, diet, and exercise. Subscales/items: CDC HRQOL- 4-Physical health, mental health, days not good, 4 items. Scoring: To obtain this estimate, responses to questions 2 and 3 are combined to calculate a summary index of overall unhealthy days, with a logical maximum of 30 unhealthy days. Participants were asked whether they had any of 16 chronic health problems (1 yes, 2 no). Scored to create overall measure of health problems. Four diet questions about frequency of consuming. Summed to create mean scores for each item. 4 individual exercise-related questions, individually scored. 4-item HDCM BRFSS (Past 30 days, health-related problems). Score summed. With the exception of the full of energy item, higher scores indicate poorer health.

    Change from Baseline, Pre-test, Post-test (within one month of completion of intervention), 6, 9, and 12 month follow-ups.

  • Alabama Parenting Questionnaire-9/ APQ-SF

    Measures five dimensions of parenting. 13-item scale. Items (e.g. You threaten to punish your child and then do not actually punish him/her) are rated on a 5 point Likert Scale (1 = never; 2 = almost never; 3 = sometimes; 4 = often; 5 = always). Higher scores indicate higher ratings of the measured parenting practice (i.e. Positive Parenting, Inconsistent Discipline, Poor Supervision).

    Change from Baseline, Pre-test, Post-test (within one month of completion of intervention), 6, 9, and 12 month follow-ups.

Secondary Outcomes (20)

  • Change in the CSAP = Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (Minority Initiative)

    Change from Baseline, Pre-test, Post-test (within one month of completion of intervention), and 12 month follow-ups.

  • Change in the PSDQ-SF=Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire-Short Form

    Change from Baseline, Pre-test, and Post-test (within one month of completion of intervention).

  • Change in the SRHP=Self-Rated Health Practices

    Change from Baseline, Pre-test, Post-test (within one month of completion of intervention), and 12 month follow-ups.

  • Change in the Kidscreen

    Change from Baseline, Pre-test, Post-test (within one month of completion of intervention), and 12 month follow-ups.

  • Change in the GAD-7=Generalized Anxiety Disorder

    Change from Baseline, Pre-test, Post-test (within one month of completion of intervention), and 12 month follow-ups.

  • +15 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Families Receiving Weaving Healthy Families Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

The Weaving Healthy Families curriculum is a cognitive-behavioral, support group model for high-risk families related to alcohol, tobacco, or other drugs (ATOD) and/or or domestic violence, child abuse, or neglect. This curriculum is tailored for all ages (i.e., (a) parents/caregivers; (b) early childhood (5-7); (c) children (8-11); and (d) adolescent (12-17) and is aimed at reducing alcohol and other drug (AOD) abuse, promote unity, address mental health problems, strengthen parenting skills, and bolster wellness and resilience.

Behavioral: Weaving Healthy Families Program

Families who have not yet receive the Weaving Healthy Families

NO INTERVENTION

Baseline group --data will be collected prior to receiving the intervention in this stepped-wedge trial design.

Interventions

The Weaving Healthy Families program is created from integrating the widely disseminated, ecological, innovative, and culturally grounded Framework of Historical Oppression, Resilience, and Transcendence (FHORT) with the the Celebrating Families! evidenced-based program (EBP). The goal of this program is to reduce and postpone Alcohol and other Drug (AOD) use, decrease and prevent violence in families, and promote resilience and wellness (including mental health) among NA adults and youth. This intervention seeks to promote wellness by targeting key behavioral (AOD), mental/emotional (emotional regulation/anger management, cognitions, resilience), social and familial (healthy and safe relationships, the family environment, and parenting), cultural (values, traditions), and physical (nutrition) factors.

Also known as: Celebrating Families! Program
Families Receiving Weaving Healthy Families Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age5 Years - 120 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years of age or older
  • have at least a high school degree
  • have experience and/or interest in working with tribal children and families.

You may not qualify if:

  • having less than a high school degree
  • not having experience with tribal families
  • includes written consent for adults and assent for children ages 12-17.
  • at least one parent/caregiver who is a member of the focal tribe and at least one child, aged 12-18 living in the household
  • current protective order
  • current intimate partner violence (IPV) record will be excluded.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Catherine McKinley

New Orleans, Louisiana, 70125, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

AlcoholismHealth BehaviorBehaviorStress, Psychological

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Alcohol-Related DisordersSubstance-Related DisordersChemically-Induced DisordersMental DisordersBehavioral Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Masking Details
Families and CHRs will be blinded to the order they receive the intervention and notified a month in advance.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: The proposed research will use a stepped-wedge trial design (SWTD) to test the efficacy of a culturally modified intervention that is facilitated by Tribally-based community health representatives (CHRs) and the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) to examine the barriers and facilitators for intervention sustainability and implementation.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 11, 2019

First Posted

April 23, 2019

Study Start

August 30, 2020

Primary Completion

May 1, 2025

Study Completion

October 1, 2025

Last Updated

February 20, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-02

Locations