Clinical Trial Comparing ERCP vs ERCP and Transmural Gall Bladder Drainage
PECAS
Randomized Multicentre Double-blind Clinical Trial Comparing ERCP vs ERCP and Transmural Gall Bladder Drainage in Non-surgical Patients With Symptomatic Choledocholithiasis
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cholelithiasis occurs in 10-20% of the general population. Up to 18% of these subjects will present symptoms. In patients with symptomatic choledocholithiasis who are not candidates for surgery with indication for ERCP, transmural drainage of the gallbladder reduces the risk of recurrence. The investigators propose a multicentric double-blind randomized trial. Our primary objective is to assess whether ERCP associated with transmural gallbladder drainage is able to reduce biliary disease income compared with ERCP in patients not candidates for surgery with symptomatic choledocholithiasis and cholelithiasis during one year of follow-up. Also the investigators will analyze the proportion of technical success and complications. The study population includes all patients older than 75 years with symptomatic choledocholithiasis. An estimated 75 subjects per group (ERCP alone and ERCP and transmural drainage) are needed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 13, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 19, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2026
CompletedMarch 11, 2025
March 1, 2025
3.3 years
April 13, 2019
March 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of paticipants readmitted due to biliary pathology
Rate of participants readmitted due to biliary pathology (cholecystitis, cholangitis, pancreatitis, hepatic abscess...) in each group
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Number of participants with technical success
1 day
Number of dead participants
1 year
Hospital costs (euros)
1 year
Study Arms (2)
ERCP with sphincterotomy + gall bladder drainage with LAMS
EXPERIMENTALAn ERCP with biliary sphincterotomy will be performed. The performance of other techniques (balloon extraction, dilation, placement of biliary prosthesis ...) is at the expense of the endoscopist. After this, transmural drainage of the gallbladder will be performed by placing a LAMS Axios (Boston Scientific) usually 15x10 mm or 10x10 mm to allow direct cholecystoscopy with a conventional gastroscope or transnasal gastroscope. The placement of the drainage will be performed in the same endoscopic act, by means of an Olympus® sectorial echoendoscope, assisted with X-rays, which allows puncturing the vesicle from the gastric antrum or the duodenal bulb to generate a cholecysto-gastrostomy or cholecysto-duodenostomy respectively. After the puncture of the vesicle from the most optimal anatomical point, it will be tutored with guidance and a Hot Axios® PAL will be placed on it to generate the anastomosis between the aforementioned structures.
ERCP with sphincterotomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORAn ERCP with biliary sphincterotomy will be performed. The performance of other techniques (balloon extraction, dilation, placement of biliary prosthesis ...) is at the expense of the endoscopist.
Interventions
Placing a PAL Axios (Boston Scientific) usually 15x10 mm or 10x10 mm to allow direct cholecystoscopy with a conventional gastroscope or transnasal gastroscope. The placement of the drainage will be performed in the same endoscopic act, by means of an Olympus® sectorial echoendoscope, assisted with X-rays, which allows puncturing the vesicle from the gastric antrum or the duodenal bulb to generate a cholecysto-gastrostomy or cholecysto-duodenostomy respectively. After the puncture of the vesicle from the most optimal anatomical point, it will be tutored with guidance and a Hot Axios® PAL 15x10 mm or 10x10 mm will be \*placed on it to generate the anastomosis between the aforementioned structures.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Symptomatic choledocholithiasis (choledocholithiasis demonstrated radiologically or highly suspected by clinical data (acute cholangitis or obstructive jaundice), analytical and imaging according to the criteria of high probability of choledocholithiasis established in the clinical guidelines (ASGE Guide).
- Discarded for surgical treatment due to age, comorbidity or refusal of the patient.
- Age\>75 years
You may not qualify if:
- Charlson comorbidity scale adjusted to age \<4.
- Hepatobiliary surgery or previous superior digestive tract.
- Ascitis.
- Inability to tolerate sedation of endoscopy, perforation of the digestive tract or other contraindication to endoscopy.
- Coagulopathy with INR (international normalized ratio) \> 1.5 not correctable or thrombocytopenia \<50000 / mm3 not correctable.
- Other diagnoses at admission (acute cholecystitis, acute pancreatitis, biliopancreatic neoplasia).
- Hemodynamic instability.
- Urgent procedure performed after hours
- No availability of expert material / endoscopist in drainage.
- Anatomical impossibility of performing biliary drainage (absence of vesicular distension, contact between gallbladder and stomach or duodenum, contact area \<10 mm).
- Baseline ECOG (Easthern Cooperative Oncology Group) \> = 4
- Expectancy of survival \<6 months.
- Refusal to participate.
- Distance between the gallbladder and upper digestive tract\> 1cm, scleroatrophic vesicle, lack of stable acoustic window for drainage
- ERCP failed (inhability to dain common bile duct)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hospital del Rio Hortegalead
- Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajalcollaborator
- Hospital General Universitario de Alicantecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Rio Hortega
Valladolid, 47012, Spain
Related Publications (18)
Lee TH, Park DH, Lee SS, Seo DW, Park SH, Lee SK, Kim MH, Kim SJ. Outcomes of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting for symptomatic gallbladder diseases: a multicenter prospective follow-up study. Endoscopy. 2011 Aug;43(8):702-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256226. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
PMID: 21425042BACKGROUNDChoi JH, Lee SS, Choi JH, Park DH, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH. Long-term outcomes after endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis. Endoscopy. 2014 Aug;46(8):656-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365720. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
PMID: 24977397BACKGROUNDWalter D, Teoh AY, Itoi T, Perez-Miranda M, Larghi A, Sanchez-Yague A, Siersema PD, Vleggaar FP. EUS-guided gall bladder drainage with a lumen-apposing metal stent: a prospective long-term evaluation. Gut. 2016 Jan;65(1):6-8. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309925. Epub 2015 Jun 3. No abstract available.
PMID: 26041748BACKGROUNDKahaleh M, Perez-Miranda M, Artifon EL, Sharaiha RZ, Kedia P, Penas I, De la Serna C, Kumta NA, Marson F, Gaidhane M, Boumitri C, Parra V, Rondon Clavo CM, Giovannini M. International collaborative study on EUS-guided gallbladder drainage: Are we ready for prime time? Dig Liver Dis. 2016 Sep;48(9):1054-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.05.021. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
PMID: 27328985BACKGROUNDde la Serna-Higuera C, Perez-Miranda M, Gil-Simon P, Ruiz-Zorrilla R, Diez-Redondo P, Alcaide N, Sancho-del Val L, Nunez-Rodriguez H. EUS-guided transenteric gallbladder drainage with a new fistula-forming, lumen-apposing metal stent. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Feb;77(2):303-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.09.021. Epub 2012 Dec 1. No abstract available.
PMID: 23206813BACKGROUNDMcCarthy ST, Tujios S, Fontana RJ, Rahnama-Moghadam S, Elmunzer BJ, Kwon RS, Wamsteker EJ, Anderson MA, Scheiman JM, Elta GH, Piraka CR. Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Stent Placement Is Safe and Effective in High-Risk Patients Without Cirrhosis. Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Aug;60(8):2516-22. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3371-4. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
PMID: 25287001BACKGROUNDItoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Tsuchiya T, Kurihara T, Ishii K, Tsuji S, Ikeuchi N, Tsukamoto S, Takeuchi M, Kawai T, Moriyasu F. Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis in whom percutaneous transhepatic approach is contraindicated or anatomically impossible (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Sep;68(3):455-60. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.02.052. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
PMID: 18561927BACKGROUNDSodergren MH, Markar S, Pucher PH, Badran IA, Jiao LR, Darzi A. Safety of transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2015 Aug;29(8):2077-90. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3915-x. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
PMID: 25424364BACKGROUNDMcGillicuddy EA, Schuster KM, Barre K, Suarez L, Hall MR, Kaml GJ, Davis KA, Longo WE. Non-operative management of acute cholecystitis in the elderly. Br J Surg. 2012 Sep;99(9):1254-61. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8836. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
PMID: 22829411BACKGROUNDGarcia-Alonso FJ, de Lucas Gallego M, Bonillo Cambrodon D, Algaba A, de la Poza G, Martin-Mateos RM, Bermejo F. Gallstone-related disease in the elderly: is there room for improvement? Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Jun;60(6):1770-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3497-4. Epub 2015 Jan 11.
PMID: 25577265BACKGROUNDTrust MD, Sheffield KM, Boyd CA, Benarroch-Gampel J, Zhang D, Townsend CM Jr, Riall TS. Gallstone pancreatitis in older patients: Are we operating enough? Surgery. 2011 Sep;150(3):515-25. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.072.
PMID: 21878238BACKGROUNDPrevalence of gallstone disease in an Italian adult female population. Rome Group for the Epidemiology and Prevention of Cholelithiasis (GREPCO). Am J Epidemiol. 1984 May;119(5):796-805.
PMID: 6720676BACKGROUNDItoi T, Tsuyuguchi T, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Pitt HA, Kim MH, Belli G, Mayumi T, Yoshida M, Miura F, Buchler MW, Gouma DJ, Garden OJ, Jagannath P, Gomi H, Kimura Y, Higuchi R; Tokyo Guideline Revision Committee. TG13 indications and techniques for biliary drainage in acute cholangitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013 Jan;20(1):71-80. doi: 10.1007/s00534-012-0569-8.
PMID: 23307008BACKGROUNDWorking Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2013 Jul-Aug;13(4 Suppl 2):e1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2013.07.063.
PMID: 24054878BACKGROUNDRiall TS, Zhang D, Townsend CM Jr, Kuo YF, Goodwin JS. Failure to perform cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in elderly patients is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and cost. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 May;210(5):668-77, 677-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.031.
PMID: 20421027BACKGROUNDPeery AF, Crockett SD, Barritt AS, Dellon ES, Eluri S, Gangarosa LM, Jensen ET, Lund JL, Pasricha S, Runge T, Schmidt M, Shaheen NJ, Sandler RS. Burden of Gastrointestinal, Liver, and Pancreatic Diseases in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2015 Dec;149(7):1731-1741.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.08.045. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
PMID: 26327134BACKGROUNDMcSherry CK, Ferstenberg H, Calhoun WF, Lahman E, Virshup M. The natural history of diagnosed gallstone disease in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Ann Surg. 1985 Jul;202(1):59-63. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198507000-00009.
PMID: 4015212BACKGROUNDKratzer W, Mason RA, Kachele V. Prevalence of gallstones in sonographic surveys worldwide. J Clin Ultrasound. 1999 Jan;27(1):1-7. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0096(199901)27:13.0.co;2-h.
PMID: 9888092BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ana Y Carbajo López, MD
Hospital Río Hortega
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The patient and the physician responsible for the follow-up will be blinded as to the procedure performed (it will not be specified if transmural drainage was performed in the endoscopic report, nor will images of the drainage be included in the discharge report available in the electronic medical record until after the completion of the study or if complications are suspected).
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 13, 2019
First Posted
April 19, 2019
Study Start
August 1, 2019
Primary Completion
December 1, 2022
Study Completion
May 1, 2026
Last Updated
March 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share