NCT03921411

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of nemolizumab in adolescent participants with AD.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2019

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

10 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 29, 2019

Completed
11 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 9, 2019

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 19, 2019

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 19, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 19, 2020

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 21, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

April 21, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

March 29, 2019

Results QC Date

August 26, 2022

Last Update Submit

April 10, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

NemolizumabAtopic dermatitis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (34)

  • Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 1-2

    Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

    At week 1-2

  • Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 4

    Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

    At week 4

  • Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 8

    Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

    At week 8

  • Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 12

    Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

    At week 12

  • Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 16

    Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

    At week 16

  • Nemolizumab Serum Concentrations at Week 24

    Serum concentrations of Nemolizumab were analyzed using validated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

    At week 24

  • Apparent Clearance After Extravascular Administration (Cl/F) of Nemolizumab

    CL/F is apparent clearance of the drug from the serum, calculated as the drug dose divided area under the curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time \[AUC (0-inf)\].

    Baseline to week 24

  • Apparent Volume of Distribution After Extravascular Administration (Vd/F) of Nemolizumab

    Vd/F was calculated as dose divided by lambda\_z \*AUC(0-inf).

    Baseline to week 24

  • Population Lag Time (Tlag)

    Lag time is defined as the time taken for a drug to appear in the systemic circulation following administration. The population Tlag value was estimated for the overall population and was reported in this endpoint.

    Baseline to week 24

  • First Order Constant of Absorption (ka)

    PK of Nemolizumab was evaluated in participants using Ka using PK samples collected on Weeks 1-2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24. Ka was evaluated by population PK (popPK) methods and mean and standard from the model has been tabulated.

    Baseline to week 24

  • Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Nemolizumab

    Cmax was obtained from serum concentration time curve.

    Baseline to week 12

  • Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Nemolizumab

    Time to reach maximum observed serum concentration (Tmax) for Nemolizumab was derived from serum concentrations versus time data.

    Baseline to week 12

  • Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Nemolizumab at Week 4

    Ctrough is the concentration prior to study drug administration.

    At week 4

  • Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Nemolizumab at Week 8

    Ctrough is the concentration prior to study drug administration.

    At week 8

  • Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Nemolizumab at Week 12

    Ctrough is the concentration prior to study drug administration.

    At week 12

  • Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Nemolizumab at Week 16

    Ctrough is the concentration prior to study drug administration.

    At week 16

  • Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Zero to 4 Week Post-dose (AUC0-4w)

    Area under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 4 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-4w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.

    Pre-dose through 4 weeks post-dose

  • Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 8 Week Post-dose (AUC0-8w)

    Area under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-8w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.

    Pre-dose through 8 weeks post-dose

  • Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Week Post-dose (AUC0-12w)

    Area under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-12w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.

    Pre-dose through 12 week post-dose

  • Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 16 Week Post-dose (AUC0-16w)

    Area under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 16 week post dosing for Nemolizumab. AUC(0-16w) was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule.

    Pre-dose through 16 weeks post-dose

  • Apparent Terminal Half-life (t1/2)

    Apparent Terminal Half-life (t1/2) is the time required for a given drug concentration in the serum to decrease by 50%.

    Baseline to week 24

  • Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) in Serum at Week 4

    Antidrug antibodies were determined using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assay. Number of participants with positive ADA in Serum were reported.

    At week 4

  • Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies

    The number of participants with neutralizing antibodies response at time of baseline up to week 24 has been presented. Neutralizing antibodies response assay result have been only presented for participants with positive anti-drug antibody assay.

    Baseline up to Week 24

  • Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event of Special Interests (AESI) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAEs is any AE that resulted in death, life threatening, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in offspring of a study participant, is an important medical event that may jeopardize the participant or may require medical intervention. TEAE was defined as AEs starting/worsening after first intake of the study drug. TEAEs included both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. An AESI is a noteworthy event for study drug that should be monitored closely and reported immediately. The following AEs will be considered AESIs: Anaphylactic reactions, Acute allergic reactions requiring treatment, Severe injection site reaction, Newly-diagnosed asthma or worsening of asthma, Peripheral edema: limbs, bilateral and Facial edema.

    Baseline through week 24

  • Number of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score Less Than or Equal to (=<) 19 at Week 1-2

    The ACT is a participant-completed assessment consisting of 5 questions health survey for measuring asthma control. Each question is answered with a score in a range of 1 to 5 and lower score represents the more severe condition. The scale range for Question 1 is "all the time" (1) to "none of the time" (5); Question 2 range: "more than once a day" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 3 range: "4 or more nights a week" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 4 range: "3 or more times per day" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 5 range: "not controlled at all" (1) to "completely controlled" (5). A total ACT score is obtained as the sum of the 5 individual question scores that is from 5 to 25, where Higher scores mean that asthma is more controlled.

    At week 1-2

  • Number of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score Less Than or Equal to (=<) 19 at Week 4

    The ACT is a participant-completed assessment consisting of 5 questions health survey for measuring asthma control. Each question is answered with a score in a range of 1 to 5 and lower score represents the more severe condition. The scale range for Question 1 is "all the time" (1) to "none of the time" (5); Question 2 range: "more than once a day" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 3 range: "4 or more nights a week" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 4 range: "3 or more times per day" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 5 range: "not controlled at all" (1) to "completely controlled" (5). A total ACT score is obtained as the sum of the 5 individual question scores that is from 5 to 25, where Higher scores mean that asthma is more controlled.

    At week 4

  • Number of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score Less Than or Equal to (=<) 19 at Week 8

    The ACT is a participant-completed assessment consisting of 5 questions health survey for measuring asthma control. Each question is answered with a score in a range of 1 to 5 and lower score represents the more severe condition. The scale range for Question 1 is "all the time" (1) to "none of the time" (5); Question 2 range: "more than once a day" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 3 range: "4 or more nights a week" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 4 range: "3 or more times per day" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 5 range: "not controlled at all" (1) to "completely controlled" (5). A total ACT score is obtained as the sum of the 5 individual question scores that is from 5 to 25, where Higher scores mean that asthma is more controlled.

    At week 8

  • Number of Participants With Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score Less Than or Equal to (=<) 19 at Week 12

    The ACT is a participant-completed assessment consisting of 5 questions health survey for measuring asthma control. Each question is answered with a score in a range of 1 to 5 and lower score represents the more severe condition. The scale range for Question 1 is "all the time" (1) to "none of the time" (5); Question 2 range: "more than once a day" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 3 range: "4 or more nights a week" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 4 range: "3 or more times per day" (1) to "not at all" (5); Question 5 range: "not controlled at all" (1) to "completely controlled" (5). A total ACT score is obtained as the sum of the 5 individual question scores that is from 5 to 25, where Higher scores mean that asthma is more controlled.

    At week 12

  • Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Physical Examination (PE) Findings

    A complete PE included assessments of the head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck (including thyroid), skin/integumentary system, cardiovascular system, respiratory system, gastrointestinal system, musculoskeletal system, lymph nodes, and nervous system. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.

    Baseline up to Week 24

  • Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Values

    Laboratory investigation included hematology, biochemistry, and urinalysis. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory parameters were reported.

    Baseline up to Week 24

  • Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings at Week 16

    The ECG recordings were obtained after 10 minutes of rest in a semi-supine position. Number of participants with clinically significant change from baseline in ECG findings were reported. Clinically significance was decided by investigator.

    At week 16

  • Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs

    Vital signs included pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (after the participant had been sitting for at least 5 minutes), and body temperature. Clinically significance was decided by investigator..

    Baseline up to Week 24

  • Number of Participants With Abnormal Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) <80% of Predicted Value at Week 1-2

    PEF was the maximum speed of expiration measured using spirometer. A participant took rest just before the measurement. At each time of measurement, a participant expired for at least 6 seconds wherever possible. At each time of measurement, at least 3 readings were obtained, and three readings which were obtained in an appropriate manner were stored. PEF \<80% of predictive value is considered as abnormal.

    At week 1-2

  • Number of Participants With Abnormal Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) <80% Predicted Value at Week 4

    PEF was the maximum speed of expiration measured using spirometer. A participant took rest just before the measurement. At each time of measurement, a participant expired for at least 6 seconds wherever possible. At each time of measurement, at least 3 readings were obtained, and three readings which were obtained in an appropriate manner were stored. PEF \<80% of predictive value is considered as abnormal.

    At week 4

Secondary Outcomes (18)

  • Non-Compartmental Analysis: Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 4 Weeks Post-dose AUC(0-4w)

    Pre-dose through 4 weeks post-dose

  • Non-Compartmental Analysis: Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 8 Week Post-dose (AUC0-8w)

    Pre-dose through 8 weeks post-dose

  • Non-Compartmental Analysis: Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Week Post-dose (AUC0-12w)

    Pre-dose through 12 week post-dose

  • Non-Compartmental Analysis: Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 16 Week Post-dose (AUC0-16w)

    Pre-dose through 16 weeks post-dose

  • Absolute Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Week 16

    Baseline, Week 16

  • +13 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Nemolizumab

EXPERIMENTAL

Nemolizumab

Biological: Nemolizumab

Interventions

NemolizumabBIOLOGICAL

Participants received subcutaneous (SC) injection of 30 milligram (mg) of Nemolizumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) over a 16-week treatment period, with a loading dose of 60 mg on Day 1.

Nemolizumab

Eligibility Criteria

Age12 Years - 17 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female participants ≥ 12 to \< 17 years of age
  • Chronic AD that has been documented for at least 2 years
  • Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score ≥ 16
  • Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score ≥ 3
  • AD involvement ≥ 10% of Body Surface Area (BSA)
  • Documented recent history of inadequate response to topical medications
  • Women of childbearing potential must agree to be strictly abstinent or to use an effective and approved method of contraception throughout the study and for 12 weeks after the last study drug injection.

You may not qualify if:

  • Body weight \< 30 kilogram (kg)
  • Cutaneous infection within 1 week or any infection requiring treatment with oral or parenteral antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics, or antifungals within 1 week
  • History of hypersensitivity (including anaphylaxis) to an immunoglobulin product (plasma-derived or recombinant, example., monoclonal antibody)
  • Any medical or psychological condition, or any clinically relevant laboratory abnormalities that may have put the subject at significant risk according to the investigator's judgment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (10)

Galderma Investigational Site

Fountain Valley, California, 92708, United States

Location

Galderma Investigational Site

Fremont, California, 94538, United States

Location

Galderma Investigational Site

Jacksonville, Florida, 32256, United States

Location

Galderma Investigational Site

Tampa, Florida, 33607, United States

Location

Galderma Investigational Site

Columbus, Georgia, 31904, United States

Location

Galderma Investigational Site

Sandy Springs, Georgia, 30128, United States

Location

Galderma Investigational Site

Gresham, Oregon, 97030, United States

Location

Galderma Investigational Site

Dallas, Texas, 75230-5806, United States

Location

Galderma Investigational Site

Frisco, Texas, 75034, United States

Location

Galderma Investigational Site

Richmond, Virginia, 23220, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Sidbury R, Alpizar S, Laquer V, Dhawan S, Abramovits W, Loprete L, Krishnaswamy JK, Ahmad F, Jabbar-Lopez Z, Piketty C. Pharmacokinetics, Safety, Efficacy, and Biomarker Profiles During Nemolizumab Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Adolescents. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Mar;12(3):631-642. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00678-7. Epub 2022 Jan 28.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dermatitis, Atopic

Interventions

nemolizumab

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Skin Diseases, GeneticGenetic Diseases, InbornCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesDermatitisSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesSkin Diseases, EczematousHypersensitivity, ImmediateHypersensitivityImmune System Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Clinical Operations
Organization
Galderma

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2019

First Posted

April 19, 2019

Study Start

April 9, 2019

Primary Completion

August 19, 2020

Study Completion

August 19, 2020

Last Updated

April 21, 2023

Results First Posted

April 21, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations