Evaluate Efficacy, PK, and Safety of FB825 in Adults With Atopic Dermatitis
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety of Multiple Intravenous Doses of FB825 in Adults With Atopic Dermatitis
1 other identifier
interventional
99
1 country
18
Brief Summary
The study aims to evaluate the efficacy, improvement from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score, of multiple intravenous (IV) doses of FB825 in subjects with atopic dermatitis
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Mar 2020
18 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 10, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 13, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2022
CompletedApril 4, 2022
September 1, 2021
1.8 years
April 13, 2020
March 31, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The mean change of Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI] from baseline to Week 16
An EASI score is used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema, the minimum EASI score is 0 and the maximum EASI score is 72, with the higher scores reflecting the worse severity of AD. The mean change of EASI reflects the participants whose disease changes.
16 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Proportion of patients with Eczema Area and Severity Index≥75% [ EASI-75] ( ≥75% improvement from baseline) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 weeks
The mean percentage change from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI ]score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24.
2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 weeks
Proportion of patients with Eczema Area and Severity Index≥50% [ EASI-50] ( ≥50% improvement from baseline) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 weeks
Proportion of patients with Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI-90] ( ≥90 % improvement from baseline) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 weeks
The mean percentage change from baseline in validated Investigator Global Assessment [vIGA-AD] score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24.
2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 weeks
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
FB825
ACTIVE COMPARATORFB825
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORFormulation buffer
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The subject is male or female between 18 and 70 years of age.
- The subject has a physician-confirmed diagnosis of chronic atopic dermatitis based on 2 years history of symptoms defined by the Eichenfield revised criteria of Hannifin and Rajka.
- Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score ≧16 at the screening and baseline (Day 1) visits.
- Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™) score ≧ 3 (5-point scale) at the screening and baseline (Day 1) visits.
- ≧10 % body surface area (BSA) of AD involvement at the screening and baseline (Day 1) visits.
- Note: BSA is measured as Part A (Extent) of SCORAD.
- Baseline pruritus numerical rating scale (NRS) average score for maximum itch intensity of ≧3, based on the average of daily pruritus NRS scores for maximum itch intensity reported during the 7 days prior to randomization.
- History of inadequate response to a stable (4 weeks) regimen of topical corticosteroids (TCS) or topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) as treatment for AD within 6 months before the screening visit. (The regimen of topical corticosteroids means medium to higher potency, applied for at least 4 weeks or for the maximum duration recommended by product prescribing information.) 7.1 Inadequate response is defined as failure to achieve and maintain remission or a low disease activity state (comparable to vIGA-AD 0=clear to 2=mild) 7.2 Subjects with systemic treatment for AD in the past 6 months were also considered as inadequate responders to topical treatments and were potentially eligible for treatment with FB825 after appropriate washout.
- Patients must be applying stable doses of an additive-free, basic bland emollient twice-daily for at least 1 week immediately before the baseline visit (Day 1).
- Female subjects of childbearing potential must use an acceptable method of birth control (i.e., diaphragm, intrauterine device, condom, hormonal contraceptives, or abstinence) throughout the study or be surgically sterile (i.e., hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or bilateral oophorectomy), or postmenopausal (defined as amenorrhea 12 consecutive months and documented serum follicle stimulating hormone level \>40 mU/mL). All female subjects must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening and baseline (Day 1) visits.
- Note: The subject must use the method of effective contraception during study period and in 16 weeks or 5 half-lives after the last dosing of FB825.
- The subject is able to provide written informed consent.
- The subject agrees to comply with all protocol requirements.
You may not qualify if:
- Female subjects who are pregnant or lactating.
- The subject has a positive test result for hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis B core antibody, hepatitis C virus antibody, or human immunodeficiency virus antibodies at screening. Having a history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
- The subject has a history of drug abuse that would impair or risk the patients' full participation in the study, in the opinion of the investigator.
- The subject has a clinically significant, currently active or underlying gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, nervous system, psychiatric, metabolic, renal, hepatic, respiratory (with the exception of uncomplicated allergic rhinitis), inflammatory, immunological, endocrine, diabetes, or infectious disease and is ineligible to participate in the study as judged by the investigator.
- The subject has a clinically significant history, as determined by the investigator, of drug allergies or hypersensitivity such as, but not limited to, sulfonamides and penicillin, or a drug allergy witnessed in a previous study with experimental drugs.
- The subject has any history of a previous anaphylactic reaction.
- The subject has any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise the study or the well-being of the subject or prevent the subject from meeting or performing study requirements.
- The subject has received TCS or TCI within 7 days before the baseline visit (Day 1).
- The subject has received any immunoglobulin products or blood products within 3 months of baseline visit (Day 1).
- The subject has received a biologic product (including investigational biologic product):
- Any cell-depleting agents, not only limited to rituximab, within 6 months of baseline visit (Day 1), or before the lymphocyte count returns to normal, whichever is longer.
- Other biologics such as dupilumab within 5 half-lives (if known) or within 16 weeks, whichever is longer, before the study treatment.
- Initiation of treatment of AD with prescription moisturizers or moisturizers containing additives such as ceramide, hyaluronic acid, urea, or filaggrin degradation products during the screening period (patients may continue using stable doses of such moisturizers if initiated before the screening visit)
- The subject has received an investigational drug within 8 weeks or within 5 half-lives (if known), whichever is longer, before study treatment.
- The subject is a member of the professional or ancillary personnel involved in the study.
- +18 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (18)
Zenith Research
Beverly Hills, California, 90212, United States
Encino Research Center
Encino, California, 91436, United States
Marvel Research 002, LLC
Huntington Beach, California, 92647, United States
Providence Clinical Research
North Hollywood, California, 91606, United States
ACRC Studies
San Diego, California, 92119, United States
Unison Clinical Trials
Sherman Oaks, California, 991403, United States
University Clinical Research - Deland, LLC
DeLand, Florida, 32720, United States
FXM Clinical Research Ft. Lauderdale, LLC.
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33308, United States
Sweet Hope Research Specialty
Hialeah, Florida, 33016, United States
Universal Axon - Homestead, LLC
Homestead, Florida, 33030, United States
FXM Clinical Research Miramar, LLC
Miramar, Florida, 33027, United States
FXM Clinical Research Miami, LLC
Miramar, Florida, 33175, United States
Moore Clinical Research
Tampa, Florida, 33609, United States
Avita Clinical Research (PCRS Network)
Tampa, Florida, 33613, United States
Oakland Hills Dermatology (PCRS Network)
Auburn Hills, Michigan, 48326, United States
Revival Research Institute, LLC
Troy, Michigan, 48084, United States
Paddington Testing Co, Inc
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19103, United States
Clinical Research Partners
Richmond, Virginia, 23226, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
NienYi Chen, PhD
Oneness Biotech
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 13, 2020
First Posted
June 4, 2020
Study Start
March 10, 2020
Primary Completion
December 31, 2021
Study Completion
June 30, 2022
Last Updated
April 4, 2022
Record last verified: 2021-09