Comparison of Efficacy and Side Effects Between the Obtryx and Solyx Band With 5-year Follow-up.
1 other identifier
interventional
166
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Boston2018 post-market clinical study is a prospective, randomized, non-inferiority study to assess the efficacy and adverse events of the Solyx™ Single Incision Sling (SIS) System compared to the gold-standard Obtryx™ II Sling System, in patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and long-term follow-up (5 years).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 21, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 8, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 16, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2025
CompletedSeptember 28, 2023
September 1, 2023
6 years
April 8, 2019
September 27, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Continence rate (Objective) assessed by an effort test
For the analysis of the objective cure of incontinence, an effort test will be carried out through three strokes of cough, with bladder volume between 200-300 ml in a lithotomy position.
Month 1
Continence rate (Objective) assessed by an effort test
For the analysis of the objective cure of incontinence, an effort test will be carried out through three strokes of cough, with bladder volume between 200-300 ml in a lithotomy position.
Month 6
Continence rate (Objective) assessed by an effort test
For the analysis of the objective cure of incontinence, an effort test will be carried out through three strokes of cough, with bladder volume between 200-300 ml in a lithotomy position.
Year 1
Continence rate (Objective) assessed by an effort test
For the analysis of the objective cure of incontinence, an effort test will be carried out through three strokes of cough, with bladder volume between 200-300 ml in a lithotomy position.
Year 2
Continence rate (Objective) assessed by an effort test
For the analysis of the objective cure of incontinence, an effort test will be carried out through three strokes of cough, with bladder volume between 200-300 ml in a lithotomy position.
Year 3
Continence rate (Objective) assessed by an effort test
For the analysis of the objective cure of incontinence, an effort test will be carried out through three strokes of cough, with bladder volume between 200-300 ml in a lithotomy position.
Year 4
Continence rate (Objective) assessed by an effort test
For the analysis of the objective cure of incontinence, an effort test will be carried out through three strokes of cough, with bladder volume between 200-300 ml in a lithotomy position.
Year 5
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Continence rate (Subjective) assessed by Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Short Form (ICQ-SF)
Month 1, month 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, year 4 and year 5.
Pad test
Month 1, month 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, year 4 and year 5.
Patient satisfaction assessed by PGI-I (Patient Global Impression of Improvement)
Month 1, month 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, year 4 and year 5.
Patient satisfaction assessed by the "Global Satisfaction Test"
Month 1, month 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, year 4 and year 5.
Patient satisfaction assessed by the "Recommendations questionnarie"
Month 1, month 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, year 4 and year 5.
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
S (SOLYX)
EXPERIMENTALThe Solyx™SIS System is an innovative mid-urethral sling single incision system consisting of a 9 cm long polypropylene mesh, whose mid-urethral portion (4 cm) is detanged to potentially resist deformation and to reduce irritation to the urethral wall. Snap-fit to delivery device tip allows for advanced placement control and, therefore, the tensioning through the forward and reverse functions performed with this delivery device.
O (OBTRYX II)
EXPERIMENTALThe Obtryx II System (Halo) is a transobturator sling designed to allow inter-operative adjustability with minimal tissue disruption. It consists of two delivery devices (one patient right and one patient left) and one mesh assembly. The mesh assembly is comprised of a polypropylene knitted mesh with dilator legs and a center tab. At the distal ends of the dilator legs there are association loops designed to be placed in the needle slot of the distal end of the delivery device. The disposable delivery device consists of a handle with a stainless steel needle. The needle is designed to facilitate the passage of the mesh assembly through bodily tissues for placement through the obturator foramen.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients diagnosed with symptomatic stress urinary incontinence candidates for stress-free bands
- Age \> or = 40 years
- informed consent signed by the patient
You may not qualify if:
- patients who are pregnant or wish to become
- patients who need anticoagulant
- active vaginal or urinary infection
- previous surgical interventions for the treatment of incontinence
- body mass index \> 35
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe
Valencia, Spain
Related Publications (11)
Thom DH, Nygaard IE, Calhoun EA. Urologic diseases in America project: urinary incontinence in women-national trends in hospitalizations, office visits, treatment and economic impact. J Urol. 2005 Apr;173(4):1295-301. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000155679.77895.cb.
PMID: 15758785BACKGROUNDHaylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN; International Urogynecological Association; International Continence Society. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4-20. doi: 10.1002/nau.20798.
PMID: 19941278BACKGROUNDAbrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, Van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A; Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology. 2003 Jan;61(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02243-4. No abstract available.
PMID: 12559262BACKGROUNDYalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):98-101. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.379.
PMID: 12861145BACKGROUNDUlmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, Varhos G. An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996;7(2):81-5; discussion 85-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01902378.
PMID: 8798092BACKGROUNDWard KL, Hilton P; UK and Ireland TVT Trial Group. Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow up. BJOG. 2008 Jan;115(2):226-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01548.x. Epub 2007 Oct 25.
PMID: 17970791BACKGROUNDNilsson CG, Palva K, Rezapour M, Falconer C. Eleven years prospective follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Aug;19(8):1043-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0666-z. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
PMID: 18535753BACKGROUNDNambiar A, Cody JD, Jeffery ST, Aluko P. Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 26;7(7):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub3.
PMID: 28746980BACKGROUNDFord AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Ogah J. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 1;(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub3.
PMID: 26130017BACKGROUNDFord AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Aluko P, Ogah JA. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 31;7(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub4.
PMID: 28756647BACKGROUNDCarter E, Johnson EE, Still M, Al-Assaf AS, Bryant A, Aluko P, Jeffery ST, Nambiar A. Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 27;10(10):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub4.
PMID: 37888839DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marta Garcia
Instituto de Investigación y Politécnico La Fe
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 8, 2019
First Posted
April 16, 2019
Study Start
December 21, 2018
Primary Completion
January 1, 2025
Study Completion
January 1, 2025
Last Updated
September 28, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share