NCT03916471

Brief Summary

Boston2018 post-market clinical study is a prospective, randomized, non-inferiority study to assess the efficacy and adverse events of the Solyx™ Single Incision Sling (SIS) System compared to the gold-standard Obtryx™ II Sling System, in patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and long-term follow-up (5 years).

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
166

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 21, 2018

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 8, 2019

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 16, 2019

Completed
5.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 28, 2023

Status Verified

September 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

6 years

First QC Date

April 8, 2019

Last Update Submit

September 27, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Stress Urinary Incontinence

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Continence rate (Objective) assessed by an effort test

    For the analysis of the objective cure of incontinence, an effort test will be carried out through three strokes of cough, with bladder volume between 200-300 ml in a lithotomy position.

    Month 1

  • Continence rate (Objective) assessed by an effort test

    For the analysis of the objective cure of incontinence, an effort test will be carried out through three strokes of cough, with bladder volume between 200-300 ml in a lithotomy position.

    Month 6

  • Continence rate (Objective) assessed by an effort test

    For the analysis of the objective cure of incontinence, an effort test will be carried out through three strokes of cough, with bladder volume between 200-300 ml in a lithotomy position.

    Year 1

  • Continence rate (Objective) assessed by an effort test

    For the analysis of the objective cure of incontinence, an effort test will be carried out through three strokes of cough, with bladder volume between 200-300 ml in a lithotomy position.

    Year 2

  • Continence rate (Objective) assessed by an effort test

    For the analysis of the objective cure of incontinence, an effort test will be carried out through three strokes of cough, with bladder volume between 200-300 ml in a lithotomy position.

    Year 3

  • Continence rate (Objective) assessed by an effort test

    For the analysis of the objective cure of incontinence, an effort test will be carried out through three strokes of cough, with bladder volume between 200-300 ml in a lithotomy position.

    Year 4

  • Continence rate (Objective) assessed by an effort test

    For the analysis of the objective cure of incontinence, an effort test will be carried out through three strokes of cough, with bladder volume between 200-300 ml in a lithotomy position.

    Year 5

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Continence rate (Subjective) assessed by Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Short Form (ICQ-SF)

    Month 1, month 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, year 4 and year 5.

  • Pad test

    Month 1, month 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, year 4 and year 5.

  • Patient satisfaction assessed by PGI-I (Patient Global Impression of Improvement)

    Month 1, month 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, year 4 and year 5.

  • Patient satisfaction assessed by the "Global Satisfaction Test"

    Month 1, month 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, year 4 and year 5.

  • Patient satisfaction assessed by the "Recommendations questionnarie"

    Month 1, month 6, year 1, year 2, year 3, year 4 and year 5.

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

S (SOLYX)

EXPERIMENTAL

The Solyx™SIS System is an innovative mid-urethral sling single incision system consisting of a 9 cm long polypropylene mesh, whose mid-urethral portion (4 cm) is detanged to potentially resist deformation and to reduce irritation to the urethral wall. Snap-fit to delivery device tip allows for advanced placement control and, therefore, the tensioning through the forward and reverse functions performed with this delivery device.

Device: Solyx™ SIS System

O (OBTRYX II)

EXPERIMENTAL

The Obtryx II System (Halo) is a transobturator sling designed to allow inter-operative adjustability with minimal tissue disruption. It consists of two delivery devices (one patient right and one patient left) and one mesh assembly. The mesh assembly is comprised of a polypropylene knitted mesh with dilator legs and a center tab. At the distal ends of the dilator legs there are association loops designed to be placed in the needle slot of the distal end of the delivery device. The disposable delivery device consists of a handle with a stainless steel needle. The needle is designed to facilitate the passage of the mesh assembly through bodily tissues for placement through the obturator foramen.

Device: Obtryx™ II System (Halo)

Interventions

Single-incision sling system

S (SOLYX)

Transobturator Mid-urethral Sling System

O (OBTRYX II)

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years+
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility Detailsfemale diagnosed with symtomatic stress urinary incontinence
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patients diagnosed with symptomatic stress urinary incontinence candidates for stress-free bands
  • Age \> or = 40 years
  • informed consent signed by the patient

You may not qualify if:

  • patients who are pregnant or wish to become
  • patients who need anticoagulant
  • active vaginal or urinary infection
  • previous surgical interventions for the treatment of incontinence
  • body mass index \> 35

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe

Valencia, Spain

RECRUITING

Related Publications (11)

  • Thom DH, Nygaard IE, Calhoun EA. Urologic diseases in America project: urinary incontinence in women-national trends in hospitalizations, office visits, treatment and economic impact. J Urol. 2005 Apr;173(4):1295-301. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000155679.77895.cb.

    PMID: 15758785BACKGROUND
  • Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN; International Urogynecological Association; International Continence Society. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4-20. doi: 10.1002/nau.20798.

    PMID: 19941278BACKGROUND
  • Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, Van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A; Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology. 2003 Jan;61(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02243-4. No abstract available.

    PMID: 12559262BACKGROUND
  • Yalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):98-101. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.379.

    PMID: 12861145BACKGROUND
  • Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, Varhos G. An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996;7(2):81-5; discussion 85-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01902378.

    PMID: 8798092BACKGROUND
  • Ward KL, Hilton P; UK and Ireland TVT Trial Group. Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow up. BJOG. 2008 Jan;115(2):226-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01548.x. Epub 2007 Oct 25.

    PMID: 17970791BACKGROUND
  • Nilsson CG, Palva K, Rezapour M, Falconer C. Eleven years prospective follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Aug;19(8):1043-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0666-z. Epub 2008 Jun 6.

    PMID: 18535753BACKGROUND
  • Nambiar A, Cody JD, Jeffery ST, Aluko P. Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 26;7(7):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub3.

    PMID: 28746980BACKGROUND
  • Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Ogah J. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 1;(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub3.

    PMID: 26130017BACKGROUND
  • Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Aluko P, Ogah JA. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 31;7(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub4.

    PMID: 28756647BACKGROUND
  • Carter E, Johnson EE, Still M, Al-Assaf AS, Bryant A, Aluko P, Jeffery ST, Nambiar A. Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 27;10(10):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub4.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary Incontinence, Stress

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urinary IncontinenceUrination DisordersUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesLower Urinary Tract SymptomsUrological ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Marta Garcia

    Instituto de Investigación y Politécnico La Fe

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2019

First Posted

April 16, 2019

Study Start

December 21, 2018

Primary Completion

January 1, 2025

Study Completion

January 1, 2025

Last Updated

September 28, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations