NCT03913715

Brief Summary

Over one million individuals in the U.S. have ostomies. The American Cancer Society estimates 43,030 rectal cancer cases and 81,190 bladder cancer cases will be diagnosed in 2018.Of these, at least 30,000 will receive ostomies, and an additional unknown number due to gynecologic, other gastrointestinal, or other gastro-urinary tumors. The health-related quality of life impact is tremendous and greater than with many other cancer treatments. An ostomy is often a prolonged or lifelong disabling problem for cancer survivors. The adaptation period is quite variable. In our R01 study, 18% of participants took at least one year to be comfortable, or never felt comfortable, in managing their ostomy care. Importantly, many patients cannot attend in-person self-management programs or patient groups for a myriad of reasons, including distance to travel, lack of access to transportation, monetary outlays, competing demands (such as work), or comorbidities making travel difficult. In addition, a national shortage of OCNs means patients with an ostomy, whether newly placed or a long-term issue, receive little help. It is imperative to study interventions for rural survivors aimed to limit family financial burdens, improve ostomy outcomes, and improve survivors' well-being.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
204

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
6mo left

Started Aug 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

10 active sites

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress93%
Aug 2019Oct 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 14, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 12, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2019

Completed
6.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2025

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 31, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

July 11, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

6.1 years

First QC Date

February 14, 2019

Last Update Submit

July 8, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Ileostomy, Urostomy, Colostomy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Patient Activation - PAM

    Patient Activation Measure. It uses a uni-dimensional, probabilistic Guttman-like scale that reflects a developmental model of activation that involves four stages: (1) believing the patient role is important, (2) having the confidence and knowledge necessary to take action, (3) actually taking action to maintain and improve one's health, and (4) staying the course even under stress. The measure can be used at the individual patient level to tailor interventions and assess changes. Those with higher activation scores report significantly better health, and significantly lower rates of doctor office visits, emergency room visits, and hospital nights. High internal consistency and construct validity have been reported.

    0 months

  • Patient Activation- PAM

    Patient Activation Measure. It uses a uni-dimensional, probabilistic Guttman-like scale that reflects a developmental model of activation that involves four stages: (1) believing the patient role is important, (2) having the confidence and knowledge necessary to take action, (3) actually taking action to maintain and improve one's health, and (4) staying the course even under stress. The measure can be used at the individual patient level to tailor interventions and assess changes. Those with higher activation scores report significantly better health, and significantly lower rates of doctor office visits, emergency room visits, and hospital nights. High internal consistency and construct validity have been reported.

    2 months

  • Patient Activation - PAM

    Patient Activation Measure. It uses a uni-dimensional, probabilistic Guttman-like scale that reflects a developmental model of activation that involves four stages: (1) believing the patient role is important, (2) having the confidence and knowledge necessary to take action, (3) actually taking action to maintain and improve one's health, and (4) staying the course even under stress. The measure can be used at the individual patient level to tailor interventions and assess changes. Those with higher activation scores report significantly better health, and significantly lower rates of doctor office visits, emergency room visits, and hospital nights. High internal consistency and construct validity have been reported.

    3 months

  • Patient Activation- PAM

    Patient Activation Measure.It uses a uni-dimensional, probabilistic Guttman-like scale that reflects a developmental model of activation that involves four stages: (1) believing the patient role is important, (2) having the confidence and knowledge necessary to take action, (3) actually taking action to maintain and improve one's health, and (4) staying the course even under stress. The measure can be used at the individual patient level to tailor interventions and assess changes. Those with higher activation scores report significantly better health, and significantly lower rates of doctor office visits, emergency room visits, and hospital nights. High internal consistency and construct validity have been reported.

    6 months

  • Patient Activation- PAM

    Patient Activation Measure.It uses a uni-dimensional, probabilistic Guttman-like scale that reflects a developmental model of activation that involves four stages: (1) believing the patient role is important, (2) having the confidence and knowledge necessary to take action, (3) actually taking action to maintain and improve one's health, and (4) staying the course even under stress. The measure can be used at the individual patient level to tailor interventions and assess changes. Those with higher activation scores report significantly better health, and significantly lower rates of doctor office visits, emergency room visits, and hospital nights. High internal consistency and construct validity have been reported.

    12months

Secondary Outcomes (18)

  • Self-efficacy

    0 months

  • Self-efficacy

    2 months

  • Self-efficacy

    6 months

  • Self-efficacy

    12 months

  • Health-related quality of life

    0 months

  • +13 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (4)

  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    0 months

  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    2 months

  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    6 months

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Ostomy Self-Management Training

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Ostomy Self-management Training group in which subject will learn using pouches and equipment, skincare, ostomy complications, nutritional needs, Impact on feelings, clothing changes, social relationships, being prepared for emergencies, Intimacy and sexuality, communication skills, tips for traveling and physical activity recommendations

Other: Ostomy Self-Management Training

Usual care

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Usual care in peri-operative and long-term settings is not standardized for ostomy patients. Usual care does not provide any formal, reproducible training for patients or their caregivers. It typically consists of an Ostomy Care Nurse who works with patients and caregivers concerning technical issues (fitting, emptying, supplies, surrounding skin care, etc.) while the new ostomate is still an inpatient.

Other: Ostomy Self-Management Training

Interventions

Ostomy Self management Training group in which subject will learn using pouches and equipment, skincare, ostomy complications, nutritional needs, Impact on feelings, clothing changes, social relationships, being prepared for emergencies, Intimacy and sexuality, communication skills, tips for traveling and physical activity recommendations

Ostomy Self-Management TrainingUsual care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 120 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Cancer or pre-cancer (e.g. carcinoma in situ or severe dysplasia) survivors over 18 years of age having undergone a procedure that needed an intestinal stoma (fecal or urinary). Survivors with temporary ostomies will be included.
  • Residence within a zip code that is designated as non-metropolitan or non-urban.
  • All participants must have a full understanding of the protocol and be able to sign an informed consent form.
  • Participants must be able to complete the study questionnaires and sessions in English.
  • Having an identified caregiver/support person is NOT a requirement for eligibility but will be strongly encouraged if possible.
  • All participants will attend their first training session at least six weeks after their operation.
  • There is no maximum time since surgery.
  • Eligible patients with temporary ostomies must NOT undergo ostomy reversal:
  • i. While they are participating in the training sessions (intervention arm). ii. During the corresponding time of the training sessions (usual care arm)
  • Subjects must be willing to complete the surveys described in the protocol.

You may not qualify if:

  • N/A

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (10)

University of Arkansas For Medical Sciences

Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, United States

Location

City Of Hope

Duarte, California, 91010, United States

Location

Loma Linda University Health

Loma Linda, California, 11005, United States

Location

University of New Mexico

Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131, United States

Location

University of North Carolina

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States

Location

Sanford Research Center

Fargo, North Dakota, 58122, United States

Location

Geisinger

Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822, United States

Location

Lancaster General Hospital

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17604, United States

Location

Penn Medicine

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

Location

University of South Carolina Greenville (Prisma Health)

Greenville, South Carolina, 21111, United States

Location

Study Officials

  • Robert Krouse, MD

    University of Pennsylvania

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2019

First Posted

April 12, 2019

Study Start

August 1, 2019

Primary Completion

September 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2026

Last Updated

July 11, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share
Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE

Locations